Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Andrew Jeffery <andrew@codeconstruct.com.au>
Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, Joel Stanley <joel@jms.id.au>,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org, openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: Add bmc/linux for-next to linux-next
Date: Wed, 2 Jul 2025 12:06:00 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250702120600.33f3d49d@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8b035557ad025d31ab347349ebf9b91ff668498a.camel@codeconstruct.com.au>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2197 bytes --]

Hi Andrew,

On Wed, 02 Jul 2025 11:28:06 +0930 Andrew Jeffery <andrew@codeconstruct.com.au> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2025-07-02 at 11:49 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > 
> > On Wed, 02 Jul 2025 11:01:54 +0930 Andrew Jeffery <andrew@codeconstruct.com.au> wrote:  
> > > 
> > > Could you add the following to linux-next?
> > > 
> > >    Repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bmc/linux.git
> > >    Branch: for-next
> > > 
> > > This aligns with the recent patch to MAINTAINERS for the ASPEED tree:
> > > 
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250702-bmc-tree-update-v1-1-c270cd8af0ab@codeconstruct.com.au/  
> > 
> > So, does this replace the aspeed tree
> > (git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/joel/bmc.git branch
> > for-next)?  Or sit along side it?  
> 
> It can replace joel/bmc.git, however, it should be fine to sit along-
> side until Joel confirms removal of his tree with you. I've been doing
> the BMC SoC patch wrangling recently, and he hasn't been updating his
> tree with the branches I put together until I poke him about it. In
> this case I'll just hassling him to update his tree, which should
> remove any opportunity for conflicts or the like.
> 
> > Either way, who should be the contact(s) for this tree?
> 
> Both myself and Joel.

Added from today.

Thanks for adding your subsystem tree as a participant of linux-next.  As
you may know, this is not a judgement of your code.  The purpose of
linux-next is for integration testing and to lower the impact of
conflicts between subsystems in the next merge window. 

You will need to ensure that the patches/commits in your tree/series have
been:
     * submitted under GPL v2 (or later) and include the Contributor's
        Signed-off-by,
     * posted to the relevant mailing list,
     * reviewed by you (or another maintainer of your subsystem tree),
     * successfully unit tested, and 
     * destined for the current or next Linux merge window.

Basically, this should be just what you would send to Linus (or ask him
to fetch).  It is allowed to be rebased if you deem it necessary.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell 
sfr@canb.auug.org.au

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

      reply	other threads:[~2025-07-02  2:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-07-02  1:31 Add bmc/linux for-next to linux-next Andrew Jeffery
2025-07-02  1:49 ` Stephen Rothwell
2025-07-02  1:58   ` Andrew Jeffery
2025-07-02  2:06     ` Stephen Rothwell [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250702120600.33f3d49d@canb.auug.org.au \
    --to=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=andrew@codeconstruct.com.au \
    --cc=joel@jms.id.au \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-aspeed@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=openbmc@lists.ozlabs.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox