Add bmc/linux for-next to linux-next

Add bmc/linux for-next to linux-next

[Andrew Jeffery]

Hi Stephen,

Could you add the following to linux-next?

   Repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bmc/linux.git
   Branch: for-next

This aligns with the recent patch to MAINTAINERS for the ASPEED tree:

https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250702-bmc-tree-update-v1-1-c270cd8af0ab@codeconstruct.com.au/

Cheers,

Andrew

Re: Add bmc/linux for-next to linux-next

[Stephen Rothwell]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 666 bytes --]

Hi Andrew,

On Wed, 02 Jul 2025 11:01:54 +0930 Andrew Jeffery <andrew@codeconstruct.com.au> wrote:
>
> Could you add the following to linux-next?
> 
>    Repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bmc/linux.git
>    Branch: for-next
> 
> This aligns with the recent patch to MAINTAINERS for the ASPEED tree:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250702-bmc-tree-update-v1-1-c270cd8af0ab@codeconstruct.com.au/

So, does this replace the aspeed tree
(git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/joel/bmc.git branch
for-next)?  Or sit along side it?

Either way, who should be the contact(s) for this tree?

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

Re: Add bmc/linux for-next to linux-next

[Andrew Jeffery]

Hi Stephen,

On Wed, 2025-07-02 at 11:49 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
> 
> On Wed, 02 Jul 2025 11:01:54 +0930 Andrew Jeffery <andrew@codeconstruct.com.au> wrote:
> > 
> > Could you add the following to linux-next?
> > 
> >    Repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bmc/linux.git
> >    Branch: for-next
> > 
> > This aligns with the recent patch to MAINTAINERS for the ASPEED tree:
> > 
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250702-bmc-tree-update-v1-1-c270cd8af0ab@codeconstruct.com.au/
> 
> So, does this replace the aspeed tree
> (git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/joel/bmc.git branch
> for-next)?  Or sit along side it?

It can replace joel/bmc.git, however, it should be fine to sit along-
side until Joel confirms removal of his tree with you. I've been doing
the BMC SoC patch wrangling recently, and he hasn't been updating his
tree with the branches I put together until I poke him about it. In
this case I'll just hassling him to update his tree, which should
remove any opportunity for conflicts or the like.

> 
> Either way, who should be the contact(s) for this tree?
> 

Both myself and Joel.

Cheers,

Andrew

Re: Add bmc/linux for-next to linux-next

[Stephen Rothwell]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2197 bytes --]

Hi Andrew,

On Wed, 02 Jul 2025 11:28:06 +0930 Andrew Jeffery <andrew@codeconstruct.com.au> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2025-07-02 at 11:49 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > 
> > On Wed, 02 Jul 2025 11:01:54 +0930 Andrew Jeffery <andrew@codeconstruct.com.au> wrote:  
> > > 
> > > Could you add the following to linux-next?
> > > 
> > >    Repo: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bmc/linux.git
> > >    Branch: for-next
> > > 
> > > This aligns with the recent patch to MAINTAINERS for the ASPEED tree:
> > > 
> > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250702-bmc-tree-update-v1-1-c270cd8af0ab@codeconstruct.com.au/  
> > 
> > So, does this replace the aspeed tree
> > (git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/joel/bmc.git branch
> > for-next)?  Or sit along side it?  
> 
> It can replace joel/bmc.git, however, it should be fine to sit along-
> side until Joel confirms removal of his tree with you. I've been doing
> the BMC SoC patch wrangling recently, and he hasn't been updating his
> tree with the branches I put together until I poke him about it. In
> this case I'll just hassling him to update his tree, which should
> remove any opportunity for conflicts or the like.
> 
> > Either way, who should be the contact(s) for this tree?
> 
> Both myself and Joel.

Added from today.

Thanks for adding your subsystem tree as a participant of linux-next.  As
you may know, this is not a judgement of your code.  The purpose of
linux-next is for integration testing and to lower the impact of
conflicts between subsystems in the next merge window. 

You will need to ensure that the patches/commits in your tree/series have
been:
     * submitted under GPL v2 (or later) and include the Contributor's
        Signed-off-by,
     * posted to the relevant mailing list,
     * reviewed by you (or another maintainer of your subsystem tree),
     * successfully unit tested, and 
     * destined for the current or next Linux merge window.

Basically, this should be just what you would send to Linus (or ask him
to fetch).  It is allowed to be rebased if you deem it necessary.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell 
sfr@canb.auug.org.au

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]