* [PATCH v3 0/1] Add support for parse_acpi_topology() on RISC-V
@ 2025-09-19 8:59 Yunhui Cui
2025-09-19 8:59 ` [PATCH v3 1/1] arch_topology: move parse_acpi_topology() to common code Yunhui Cui
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Yunhui Cui @ 2025-09-19 8:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: catalin.marinas, will, sudeep.holla, gregkh, rafael, dakr,
beata.michalska, ptsm, sumitg, yangyicong, cuiyunhui,
linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel
v1->v2:
Place the struct cpu_smt_info{} in drivers/base/arch_topology.c instead of arch_topology.h
v2->v3:
Modify the return values of acpi_pptt_cpu_is_thread()
Yunhui Cui (1):
arch_topology: move parse_acpi_topology() to common code
arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c | 87 +---------------------------------
drivers/base/arch_topology.c | 89 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
include/linux/arch_topology.h | 1 +
3 files changed, 90 insertions(+), 87 deletions(-)
--
2.39.5
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v3 1/1] arch_topology: move parse_acpi_topology() to common code
2025-09-19 8:59 [PATCH v3 0/1] Add support for parse_acpi_topology() on RISC-V Yunhui Cui
@ 2025-09-19 8:59 ` Yunhui Cui
2025-09-19 11:43 ` Will Deacon
2025-09-19 14:04 ` Sudeep Holla
0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Yunhui Cui @ 2025-09-19 8:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: catalin.marinas, will, sudeep.holla, gregkh, rafael, dakr,
beata.michalska, ptsm, sumitg, yangyicong, cuiyunhui,
linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel
Currently, RISC-V lacks arch-specific registers for CPU topology
properties and must get them from ACPI. Thus, parse_acpi_topology()
is moved from arm64/ to drivers/ for RISC-V reuse.
Signed-off-by: Yunhui Cui <cuiyunhui@bytedance.com>
---
arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c | 87 +---------------------------------
drivers/base/arch_topology.c | 89 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
include/linux/arch_topology.h | 1 +
3 files changed, 90 insertions(+), 87 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
index 5d07ee85bdae4..55650db53b526 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
#include <asm/topology.h>
#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
-static bool __init acpi_cpu_is_threaded(int cpu)
+bool __init acpi_cpu_is_threaded(int cpu)
{
int is_threaded = acpi_pptt_cpu_is_thread(cpu);
@@ -39,91 +39,6 @@ static bool __init acpi_cpu_is_threaded(int cpu)
return !!is_threaded;
}
-
-struct cpu_smt_info {
- unsigned int thread_num;
- int core_id;
-};
-
-/*
- * Propagate the topology information of the processor_topology_node tree to the
- * cpu_topology array.
- */
-int __init parse_acpi_topology(void)
-{
- unsigned int max_smt_thread_num = 1;
- struct cpu_smt_info *entry;
- struct xarray hetero_cpu;
- unsigned long hetero_id;
- int cpu, topology_id;
-
- if (acpi_disabled)
- return 0;
-
- xa_init(&hetero_cpu);
-
- for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
- topology_id = find_acpi_cpu_topology(cpu, 0);
- if (topology_id < 0)
- return topology_id;
-
- if (acpi_cpu_is_threaded(cpu)) {
- cpu_topology[cpu].thread_id = topology_id;
- topology_id = find_acpi_cpu_topology(cpu, 1);
- cpu_topology[cpu].core_id = topology_id;
-
- /*
- * In the PPTT, CPUs below a node with the 'identical
- * implementation' flag have the same number of threads.
- * Count the number of threads for only one CPU (i.e.
- * one core_id) among those with the same hetero_id.
- * See the comment of find_acpi_cpu_topology_hetero_id()
- * for more details.
- *
- * One entry is created for each node having:
- * - the 'identical implementation' flag
- * - its parent not having the flag
- */
- hetero_id = find_acpi_cpu_topology_hetero_id(cpu);
- entry = xa_load(&hetero_cpu, hetero_id);
- if (!entry) {
- entry = kzalloc(sizeof(*entry), GFP_KERNEL);
- WARN_ON_ONCE(!entry);
-
- if (entry) {
- entry->core_id = topology_id;
- entry->thread_num = 1;
- xa_store(&hetero_cpu, hetero_id,
- entry, GFP_KERNEL);
- }
- } else if (entry->core_id == topology_id) {
- entry->thread_num++;
- }
- } else {
- cpu_topology[cpu].thread_id = -1;
- cpu_topology[cpu].core_id = topology_id;
- }
- topology_id = find_acpi_cpu_topology_cluster(cpu);
- cpu_topology[cpu].cluster_id = topology_id;
- topology_id = find_acpi_cpu_topology_package(cpu);
- cpu_topology[cpu].package_id = topology_id;
- }
-
- /*
- * This is a short loop since the number of XArray elements is the
- * number of heterogeneous CPU clusters. On a homogeneous system
- * there's only one entry in the XArray.
- */
- xa_for_each(&hetero_cpu, hetero_id, entry) {
- max_smt_thread_num = max(max_smt_thread_num, entry->thread_num);
- xa_erase(&hetero_cpu, hetero_id);
- kfree(entry);
- }
-
- cpu_smt_set_num_threads(max_smt_thread_num, max_smt_thread_num);
- xa_destroy(&hetero_cpu);
- return 0;
-}
#endif
#ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_AMU_EXTN
diff --git a/drivers/base/arch_topology.c b/drivers/base/arch_topology.c
index 1037169abb459..09f77fd549490 100644
--- a/drivers/base/arch_topology.c
+++ b/drivers/base/arch_topology.c
@@ -823,12 +823,99 @@ void remove_cpu_topology(unsigned int cpu)
clear_cpu_topology(cpu);
}
+__weak bool __init acpi_cpu_is_threaded(int cpu)
+{
+ int is_threaded = acpi_pptt_cpu_is_thread(cpu);
+
+ return is_threaded == 1;
+}
+
+#if defined(CONFIG_ARM64) || defined(CONFIG_RISCV)
+struct cpu_smt_info {
+ unsigned int thread_num;
+ int core_id;
+};
+
+/*
+ * Propagate the topology information of the processor_topology_node tree to the
+ * cpu_topology array.
+ */
__weak int __init parse_acpi_topology(void)
{
+ unsigned int max_smt_thread_num = 1;
+ struct cpu_smt_info *entry;
+ struct xarray hetero_cpu;
+ unsigned long hetero_id;
+ int cpu, topology_id;
+
+ if (acpi_disabled)
+ return 0;
+
+ xa_init(&hetero_cpu);
+
+ for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
+ topology_id = find_acpi_cpu_topology(cpu, 0);
+ if (topology_id < 0)
+ return topology_id;
+
+ if (acpi_cpu_is_threaded(cpu)) {
+ cpu_topology[cpu].thread_id = topology_id;
+ topology_id = find_acpi_cpu_topology(cpu, 1);
+ cpu_topology[cpu].core_id = topology_id;
+
+ /*
+ * In the PPTT, CPUs below a node with the 'identical
+ * implementation' flag have the same number of threads.
+ * Count the number of threads for only one CPU (i.e.
+ * one core_id) among those with the same hetero_id.
+ * See the comment of find_acpi_cpu_topology_hetero_id()
+ * for more details.
+ *
+ * One entry is created for each node having:
+ * - the 'identical implementation' flag
+ * - its parent not having the flag
+ */
+ hetero_id = find_acpi_cpu_topology_hetero_id(cpu);
+ entry = xa_load(&hetero_cpu, hetero_id);
+ if (!entry) {
+ entry = kzalloc(sizeof(*entry), GFP_KERNEL);
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(!entry);
+
+ if (entry) {
+ entry->core_id = topology_id;
+ entry->thread_num = 1;
+ xa_store(&hetero_cpu, hetero_id,
+ entry, GFP_KERNEL);
+ }
+ } else if (entry->core_id == topology_id) {
+ entry->thread_num++;
+ }
+ } else {
+ cpu_topology[cpu].thread_id = -1;
+ cpu_topology[cpu].core_id = topology_id;
+ }
+ topology_id = find_acpi_cpu_topology_cluster(cpu);
+ cpu_topology[cpu].cluster_id = topology_id;
+ topology_id = find_acpi_cpu_topology_package(cpu);
+ cpu_topology[cpu].package_id = topology_id;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * This is a short loop since the number of XArray elements is the
+ * number of heterogeneous CPU clusters. On a homogeneous system
+ * there's only one entry in the XArray.
+ */
+ xa_for_each(&hetero_cpu, hetero_id, entry) {
+ max_smt_thread_num = max(max_smt_thread_num, entry->thread_num);
+ xa_erase(&hetero_cpu, hetero_id);
+ kfree(entry);
+ }
+
+ cpu_smt_set_num_threads(max_smt_thread_num, max_smt_thread_num);
+ xa_destroy(&hetero_cpu);
return 0;
}
-#if defined(CONFIG_ARM64) || defined(CONFIG_RISCV)
void __init init_cpu_topology(void)
{
int cpu, ret;
diff --git a/include/linux/arch_topology.h b/include/linux/arch_topology.h
index d72d6e5aa2002..8cd8a9604f33f 100644
--- a/include/linux/arch_topology.h
+++ b/include/linux/arch_topology.h
@@ -88,6 +88,7 @@ void update_siblings_masks(unsigned int cpu);
void remove_cpu_topology(unsigned int cpuid);
void reset_cpu_topology(void);
int parse_acpi_topology(void);
+bool acpi_cpu_is_threaded(int cpu);
void freq_inv_set_max_ratio(int cpu, u64 max_rate);
#endif
--
2.39.5
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] arch_topology: move parse_acpi_topology() to common code
2025-09-19 8:59 ` [PATCH v3 1/1] arch_topology: move parse_acpi_topology() to common code Yunhui Cui
@ 2025-09-19 11:43 ` Will Deacon
2025-09-19 14:04 ` Sudeep Holla
1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Will Deacon @ 2025-09-19 11:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yunhui Cui
Cc: catalin.marinas, sudeep.holla, gregkh, rafael, dakr,
beata.michalska, ptsm, sumitg, yangyicong, linux-arm-kernel,
linux-kernel
On Fri, Sep 19, 2025 at 04:59:18PM +0800, Yunhui Cui wrote:
> Currently, RISC-V lacks arch-specific registers for CPU topology
> properties and must get them from ACPI. Thus, parse_acpi_topology()
> is moved from arm64/ to drivers/ for RISC-V reuse.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yunhui Cui <cuiyunhui@bytedance.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c | 87 +---------------------------------
> drivers/base/arch_topology.c | 89 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> include/linux/arch_topology.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 90 insertions(+), 87 deletions(-)
I'm fine with shedding code from arch/arm64/ but this needs an Ack
from Sudeep.
Will
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] arch_topology: move parse_acpi_topology() to common code
2025-09-19 8:59 ` [PATCH v3 1/1] arch_topology: move parse_acpi_topology() to common code Yunhui Cui
2025-09-19 11:43 ` Will Deacon
@ 2025-09-19 14:04 ` Sudeep Holla
2025-09-22 2:18 ` [External] " yunhui cui
1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Sudeep Holla @ 2025-09-19 14:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Yunhui Cui
Cc: catalin.marinas, will, gregkh, rafael, dakr, beata.michalska,
ptsm, sumitg, yangyicong, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel
On Fri, Sep 19, 2025 at 04:59:18PM +0800, Yunhui Cui wrote:
> Currently, RISC-V lacks arch-specific registers for CPU topology
> properties and must get them from ACPI. Thus, parse_acpi_topology()
> is moved from arm64/ to drivers/ for RISC-V reuse.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yunhui Cui <cuiyunhui@bytedance.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c | 87 +---------------------------------
> drivers/base/arch_topology.c | 89 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> include/linux/arch_topology.h | 1 +
> 3 files changed, 90 insertions(+), 87 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
> index 5d07ee85bdae4..55650db53b526 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
> @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
> #include <asm/topology.h>
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> -static bool __init acpi_cpu_is_threaded(int cpu)
> +bool __init acpi_cpu_is_threaded(int cpu)
> {
> int is_threaded = acpi_pptt_cpu_is_thread(cpu);
>
> @@ -39,91 +39,6 @@ static bool __init acpi_cpu_is_threaded(int cpu)
>
> return !!is_threaded;
> }
> -
> -struct cpu_smt_info {
> - unsigned int thread_num;
> - int core_id;
> -};
> -
> -/*
> - * Propagate the topology information of the processor_topology_node tree to the
> - * cpu_topology array.
> - */
> -int __init parse_acpi_topology(void)
> -{
> - unsigned int max_smt_thread_num = 1;
> - struct cpu_smt_info *entry;
> - struct xarray hetero_cpu;
> - unsigned long hetero_id;
> - int cpu, topology_id;
> -
> - if (acpi_disabled)
> - return 0;
> -
> - xa_init(&hetero_cpu);
> -
> - for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> - topology_id = find_acpi_cpu_topology(cpu, 0);
> - if (topology_id < 0)
> - return topology_id;
> -
> - if (acpi_cpu_is_threaded(cpu)) {
> - cpu_topology[cpu].thread_id = topology_id;
> - topology_id = find_acpi_cpu_topology(cpu, 1);
> - cpu_topology[cpu].core_id = topology_id;
> -
> - /*
> - * In the PPTT, CPUs below a node with the 'identical
> - * implementation' flag have the same number of threads.
> - * Count the number of threads for only one CPU (i.e.
> - * one core_id) among those with the same hetero_id.
> - * See the comment of find_acpi_cpu_topology_hetero_id()
> - * for more details.
> - *
> - * One entry is created for each node having:
> - * - the 'identical implementation' flag
> - * - its parent not having the flag
> - */
> - hetero_id = find_acpi_cpu_topology_hetero_id(cpu);
> - entry = xa_load(&hetero_cpu, hetero_id);
> - if (!entry) {
> - entry = kzalloc(sizeof(*entry), GFP_KERNEL);
> - WARN_ON_ONCE(!entry);
> -
> - if (entry) {
> - entry->core_id = topology_id;
> - entry->thread_num = 1;
> - xa_store(&hetero_cpu, hetero_id,
> - entry, GFP_KERNEL);
> - }
> - } else if (entry->core_id == topology_id) {
> - entry->thread_num++;
> - }
> - } else {
> - cpu_topology[cpu].thread_id = -1;
> - cpu_topology[cpu].core_id = topology_id;
> - }
> - topology_id = find_acpi_cpu_topology_cluster(cpu);
> - cpu_topology[cpu].cluster_id = topology_id;
> - topology_id = find_acpi_cpu_topology_package(cpu);
> - cpu_topology[cpu].package_id = topology_id;
> - }
> -
> - /*
> - * This is a short loop since the number of XArray elements is the
> - * number of heterogeneous CPU clusters. On a homogeneous system
> - * there's only one entry in the XArray.
> - */
> - xa_for_each(&hetero_cpu, hetero_id, entry) {
> - max_smt_thread_num = max(max_smt_thread_num, entry->thread_num);
> - xa_erase(&hetero_cpu, hetero_id);
> - kfree(entry);
> - }
> -
> - cpu_smt_set_num_threads(max_smt_thread_num, max_smt_thread_num);
> - xa_destroy(&hetero_cpu);
> - return 0;
> -}
> #endif
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_AMU_EXTN
> diff --git a/drivers/base/arch_topology.c b/drivers/base/arch_topology.c
> index 1037169abb459..09f77fd549490 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/arch_topology.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/arch_topology.c
> @@ -823,12 +823,99 @@ void remove_cpu_topology(unsigned int cpu)
> clear_cpu_topology(cpu);
> }
>
> +__weak bool __init acpi_cpu_is_threaded(int cpu)
> +{
> + int is_threaded = acpi_pptt_cpu_is_thread(cpu);
> +
Just thinking if it makes sense keep acpi_cpu_is_threaded generic without
the need for weak definition.
Additional note: not sure why you haven't moved this under CONFIG_ARM64/RISCV as
done with other code.
bool __init acpi_cpu_is_threaded(int cpu)
{
int is_threaded = acpi_pptt_cpu_is_thread(cpu);
/*
* if the PPTT doesn't have thread information, check for architecture
* specific fallback if available
*/
if (is_threaded < 0)
is_threaded = arch_cpu_is_threaded();
return !!is_threaded;
}
Then you can just have the define in
#define arch_cpu_is_threaded() (read_cpuid_mpidr() & MPIDR_MT_BITMASK)
in arch/arm64/include/asm/topology.h
and
+#ifndef arch_cpu_is_threaded
+#define arch_cpu_is_threaded (0)
+#endif
in include/linux/arch_topology.h
Thoughts ?
--
Regards,
Sudeep
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [External] Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] arch_topology: move parse_acpi_topology() to common code
2025-09-19 14:04 ` Sudeep Holla
@ 2025-09-22 2:18 ` yunhui cui
2025-09-22 9:01 ` Sudeep Holla
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: yunhui cui @ 2025-09-22 2:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sudeep Holla
Cc: catalin.marinas, will, gregkh, rafael, dakr, beata.michalska,
ptsm, sumitg, yangyicong, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel
Hi Sudeep,
On Fri, Sep 19, 2025 at 10:05 PM Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Sep 19, 2025 at 04:59:18PM +0800, Yunhui Cui wrote:
> > Currently, RISC-V lacks arch-specific registers for CPU topology
> > properties and must get them from ACPI. Thus, parse_acpi_topology()
> > is moved from arm64/ to drivers/ for RISC-V reuse.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Yunhui Cui <cuiyunhui@bytedance.com>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c | 87 +---------------------------------
> > drivers/base/arch_topology.c | 89 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > include/linux/arch_topology.h | 1 +
> > 3 files changed, 90 insertions(+), 87 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
> > index 5d07ee85bdae4..55650db53b526 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/topology.c
> > @@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
> > #include <asm/topology.h>
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> > -static bool __init acpi_cpu_is_threaded(int cpu)
> > +bool __init acpi_cpu_is_threaded(int cpu)
> > {
> > int is_threaded = acpi_pptt_cpu_is_thread(cpu);
> >
> > @@ -39,91 +39,6 @@ static bool __init acpi_cpu_is_threaded(int cpu)
> >
> > return !!is_threaded;
> > }
> > -
> > -struct cpu_smt_info {
> > - unsigned int thread_num;
> > - int core_id;
> > -};
> > -
> > -/*
> > - * Propagate the topology information of the processor_topology_node tree to the
> > - * cpu_topology array.
> > - */
> > -int __init parse_acpi_topology(void)
> > -{
> > - unsigned int max_smt_thread_num = 1;
> > - struct cpu_smt_info *entry;
> > - struct xarray hetero_cpu;
> > - unsigned long hetero_id;
> > - int cpu, topology_id;
> > -
> > - if (acpi_disabled)
> > - return 0;
> > -
> > - xa_init(&hetero_cpu);
> > -
> > - for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> > - topology_id = find_acpi_cpu_topology(cpu, 0);
> > - if (topology_id < 0)
> > - return topology_id;
> > -
> > - if (acpi_cpu_is_threaded(cpu)) {
> > - cpu_topology[cpu].thread_id = topology_id;
> > - topology_id = find_acpi_cpu_topology(cpu, 1);
> > - cpu_topology[cpu].core_id = topology_id;
> > -
> > - /*
> > - * In the PPTT, CPUs below a node with the 'identical
> > - * implementation' flag have the same number of threads.
> > - * Count the number of threads for only one CPU (i.e.
> > - * one core_id) among those with the same hetero_id.
> > - * See the comment of find_acpi_cpu_topology_hetero_id()
> > - * for more details.
> > - *
> > - * One entry is created for each node having:
> > - * - the 'identical implementation' flag
> > - * - its parent not having the flag
> > - */
> > - hetero_id = find_acpi_cpu_topology_hetero_id(cpu);
> > - entry = xa_load(&hetero_cpu, hetero_id);
> > - if (!entry) {
> > - entry = kzalloc(sizeof(*entry), GFP_KERNEL);
> > - WARN_ON_ONCE(!entry);
> > -
> > - if (entry) {
> > - entry->core_id = topology_id;
> > - entry->thread_num = 1;
> > - xa_store(&hetero_cpu, hetero_id,
> > - entry, GFP_KERNEL);
> > - }
> > - } else if (entry->core_id == topology_id) {
> > - entry->thread_num++;
> > - }
> > - } else {
> > - cpu_topology[cpu].thread_id = -1;
> > - cpu_topology[cpu].core_id = topology_id;
> > - }
> > - topology_id = find_acpi_cpu_topology_cluster(cpu);
> > - cpu_topology[cpu].cluster_id = topology_id;
> > - topology_id = find_acpi_cpu_topology_package(cpu);
> > - cpu_topology[cpu].package_id = topology_id;
> > - }
> > -
> > - /*
> > - * This is a short loop since the number of XArray elements is the
> > - * number of heterogeneous CPU clusters. On a homogeneous system
> > - * there's only one entry in the XArray.
> > - */
> > - xa_for_each(&hetero_cpu, hetero_id, entry) {
> > - max_smt_thread_num = max(max_smt_thread_num, entry->thread_num);
> > - xa_erase(&hetero_cpu, hetero_id);
> > - kfree(entry);
> > - }
> > -
> > - cpu_smt_set_num_threads(max_smt_thread_num, max_smt_thread_num);
> > - xa_destroy(&hetero_cpu);
> > - return 0;
> > -}
> > #endif
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_ARM64_AMU_EXTN
> > diff --git a/drivers/base/arch_topology.c b/drivers/base/arch_topology.c
> > index 1037169abb459..09f77fd549490 100644
> > --- a/drivers/base/arch_topology.c
> > +++ b/drivers/base/arch_topology.c
> > @@ -823,12 +823,99 @@ void remove_cpu_topology(unsigned int cpu)
> > clear_cpu_topology(cpu);
> > }
> >
> > +__weak bool __init acpi_cpu_is_threaded(int cpu)
> > +{
> > + int is_threaded = acpi_pptt_cpu_is_thread(cpu);
> > +
>
> Just thinking if it makes sense keep acpi_cpu_is_threaded generic without
> the need for weak definition.
>
> Additional note: not sure why you haven't moved this under CONFIG_ARM64/RISCV as
> done with other code.
>
> bool __init acpi_cpu_is_threaded(int cpu)
> {
> int is_threaded = acpi_pptt_cpu_is_thread(cpu);
>
> /*
> * if the PPTT doesn't have thread information, check for architecture
> * specific fallback if available
> */
> if (is_threaded < 0)
> is_threaded = arch_cpu_is_threaded();
>
> return !!is_threaded;
> }
>
> Then you can just have the define in
>
> #define arch_cpu_is_threaded() (read_cpuid_mpidr() & MPIDR_MT_BITMASK)
>
> in arch/arm64/include/asm/topology.h
>
> and
>
> +#ifndef arch_cpu_is_threaded
> +#define arch_cpu_is_threaded (0)
> +#endif
>
> in include/linux/arch_topology.h
>
> Thoughts ?
If placed in include/linux/arch_topology.h, there is a possibility
that "arch_cpu_is_threaded" will be redefined.
include/linux/topology.h
#include <linux/arch_topology.h>
#ifndef arch_cpu_is_threaded
#define arch_cpu_is_threaded() (0)
#endif
#include <asm/topology.h>
#define arch_cpu_is_threaded() (read_cpuid_mpidr() & MPIDR_MT_BITMASK)
Therefore, it is better to place it in include/asm-generic/topology.h.
What do you think?
>
> --
> Regards,
> Sudeep
Thanks,
Yunhui
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [External] Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] arch_topology: move parse_acpi_topology() to common code
2025-09-22 2:18 ` [External] " yunhui cui
@ 2025-09-22 9:01 ` Sudeep Holla
2025-09-22 11:04 ` yunhui cui
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Sudeep Holla @ 2025-09-22 9:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: yunhui cui
Cc: catalin.marinas, will, gregkh, rafael, dakr, beata.michalska,
ptsm, sumitg, yangyicong, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel
On Mon, Sep 22, 2025 at 10:18:57AM +0800, yunhui cui wrote:
> Hi Sudeep,
>
> On Fri, Sep 19, 2025 at 10:05 PM Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> wrote:
[...]
> >
> > Just thinking if it makes sense keep acpi_cpu_is_threaded generic without
> > the need for weak definition.
> >
> > Additional note: not sure why you haven't moved this under CONFIG_ARM64/RISCV as
> > done with other code.
> >
> > bool __init acpi_cpu_is_threaded(int cpu)
> > {
> > int is_threaded = acpi_pptt_cpu_is_thread(cpu);
> >
> > /*
> > * if the PPTT doesn't have thread information, check for architecture
> > * specific fallback if available
> > */
> > if (is_threaded < 0)
> > is_threaded = arch_cpu_is_threaded();
> >
> > return !!is_threaded;
> > }
> >
> > Then you can just have the define in
> >
> > #define arch_cpu_is_threaded() (read_cpuid_mpidr() & MPIDR_MT_BITMASK)
> >
> > in arch/arm64/include/asm/topology.h
> >
> > and
> >
> > +#ifndef arch_cpu_is_threaded
> > +#define arch_cpu_is_threaded (0)
> > +#endif
> >
> > in include/linux/arch_topology.h
> >
> > Thoughts ?
>
> If placed in include/linux/arch_topology.h, there is a possibility
> that "arch_cpu_is_threaded" will be redefined.
>
Why is that a problem ? We want arch to override the default definition
if and when required.
--
Regards,
Sudeep
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [External] Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] arch_topology: move parse_acpi_topology() to common code
2025-09-22 9:01 ` Sudeep Holla
@ 2025-09-22 11:04 ` yunhui cui
2025-09-22 13:51 ` Sudeep Holla
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: yunhui cui @ 2025-09-22 11:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Sudeep Holla
Cc: catalin.marinas, will, gregkh, rafael, dakr, beata.michalska,
ptsm, sumitg, yangyicong, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel
Hi Sudeep,
On Mon, Sep 22, 2025 at 5:01 PM Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2025 at 10:18:57AM +0800, yunhui cui wrote:
> > Hi Sudeep,
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 19, 2025 at 10:05 PM Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > >
> > > Just thinking if it makes sense keep acpi_cpu_is_threaded generic without
> > > the need for weak definition.
> > >
> > > Additional note: not sure why you haven't moved this under CONFIG_ARM64/RISCV as
> > > done with other code.
> > >
> > > bool __init acpi_cpu_is_threaded(int cpu)
> > > {
> > > int is_threaded = acpi_pptt_cpu_is_thread(cpu);
> > >
> > > /*
> > > * if the PPTT doesn't have thread information, check for architecture
> > > * specific fallback if available
> > > */
> > > if (is_threaded < 0)
> > > is_threaded = arch_cpu_is_threaded();
> > >
> > > return !!is_threaded;
> > > }
> > >
> > > Then you can just have the define in
> > >
> > > #define arch_cpu_is_threaded() (read_cpuid_mpidr() & MPIDR_MT_BITMASK)
> > >
> > > in arch/arm64/include/asm/topology.h
> > >
> > > and
> > >
> > > +#ifndef arch_cpu_is_threaded
> > > +#define arch_cpu_is_threaded (0)
> > > +#endif
> > >
> > > in include/linux/arch_topology.h
> > >
> > > Thoughts ?
> >
> > If placed in include/linux/arch_topology.h, there is a possibility
> > that "arch_cpu_is_threaded" will be redefined.
> >
>
> Why is that a problem ? We want arch to override the default definition
> if and when required.
Because include/linux/topology.h first includes linux/arch_topology.h,
and then includes asm/topology.h, a warning will be generated during
compilation:
In file included from ./include/linux/topology.h:37,
from ./include/linux/gfp.h:8,
from ./include/linux/xarray.h:16,
from ./include/linux/list_lru.h:14,
from ./include/linux/fs.h:14,
from kernel/events/core.c:11:
./arch/arm64/include/asm/topology.h:39: warning:
"arch_cpu_is_threaded" redefined
39 | #define arch_cpu_is_threaded() (read_cpuid_mpidr() & MPIDR_MT_BITMASK)
|
In file included from ./include/linux/topology.h:30:
./include/linux/arch_topology.h:94: note: this is the location of the
previous definition
94 | #define arch_cpu_is_threaded() (0)
Unless #undef arch_cpu_is_threaded is used in arch/arm64/include/asm/topology.h,
So it's better to place
#ifndef arch_cpu_is_threaded
#define arch_cpu_is_threaded (0)
#endif
in include/asm-generic/topology.h.
>
> --
> Regards,
> Sudeep
Thanks,
Yunhui
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [External] Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] arch_topology: move parse_acpi_topology() to common code
2025-09-22 11:04 ` yunhui cui
@ 2025-09-22 13:51 ` Sudeep Holla
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Sudeep Holla @ 2025-09-22 13:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: yunhui cui
Cc: catalin.marinas, will, gregkh, Sudeep Holla, rafael, dakr,
beata.michalska, ptsm, sumitg, yangyicong, linux-arm-kernel,
linux-kernel
On Mon, Sep 22, 2025 at 07:04:05PM +0800, yunhui cui wrote:
> Hi Sudeep,
>
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2025 at 5:01 PM Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 22, 2025 at 10:18:57AM +0800, yunhui cui wrote:
> > > Hi Sudeep,
> > >
> > > On Fri, Sep 19, 2025 at 10:05 PM Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > > >
> > > > Just thinking if it makes sense keep acpi_cpu_is_threaded generic without
> > > > the need for weak definition.
> > > >
> > > > Additional note: not sure why you haven't moved this under CONFIG_ARM64/RISCV as
> > > > done with other code.
> > > >
> > > > bool __init acpi_cpu_is_threaded(int cpu)
> > > > {
> > > > int is_threaded = acpi_pptt_cpu_is_thread(cpu);
> > > >
> > > > /*
> > > > * if the PPTT doesn't have thread information, check for architecture
> > > > * specific fallback if available
> > > > */
> > > > if (is_threaded < 0)
> > > > is_threaded = arch_cpu_is_threaded();
> > > >
> > > > return !!is_threaded;
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > Then you can just have the define in
> > > >
> > > > #define arch_cpu_is_threaded() (read_cpuid_mpidr() & MPIDR_MT_BITMASK)
> > > >
> > > > in arch/arm64/include/asm/topology.h
> > > >
> > > > and
> > > >
> > > > +#ifndef arch_cpu_is_threaded
> > > > +#define arch_cpu_is_threaded (0)
> > > > +#endif
> > > >
> > > > in include/linux/arch_topology.h
> > > >
> > > > Thoughts ?
> > >
> > > If placed in include/linux/arch_topology.h, there is a possibility
> > > that "arch_cpu_is_threaded" will be redefined.
> > >
> >
> > Why is that a problem ? We want arch to override the default definition
> > if and when required.
>
> Because include/linux/topology.h first includes linux/arch_topology.h,
> and then includes asm/topology.h, a warning will be generated during
> compilation:
>
> In file included from ./include/linux/topology.h:37,
> from ./include/linux/gfp.h:8,
> from ./include/linux/xarray.h:16,
> from ./include/linux/list_lru.h:14,
> from ./include/linux/fs.h:14,
> from kernel/events/core.c:11:
> ./arch/arm64/include/asm/topology.h:39: warning:
> "arch_cpu_is_threaded" redefined
> 39 | #define arch_cpu_is_threaded() (read_cpuid_mpidr() & MPIDR_MT_BITMASK)
> |
> In file included from ./include/linux/topology.h:30:
> ./include/linux/arch_topology.h:94: note: this is the location of the
> previous definition
> 94 | #define arch_cpu_is_threaded() (0)
>
> Unless #undef arch_cpu_is_threaded is used in arch/arm64/include/asm/topology.h,
>
The above way of #undef first should be fine.
> So it's better to place
> #ifndef arch_cpu_is_threaded
> #define arch_cpu_is_threaded (0)
> #endif
> in include/asm-generic/topology.h.
>
I don't think asm-generic/topology.h is the right place and also you are
again better on order of inclusion.
--
Regards,
Sudeep
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-09-22 13:51 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-09-19 8:59 [PATCH v3 0/1] Add support for parse_acpi_topology() on RISC-V Yunhui Cui
2025-09-19 8:59 ` [PATCH v3 1/1] arch_topology: move parse_acpi_topology() to common code Yunhui Cui
2025-09-19 11:43 ` Will Deacon
2025-09-19 14:04 ` Sudeep Holla
2025-09-22 2:18 ` [External] " yunhui cui
2025-09-22 9:01 ` Sudeep Holla
2025-09-22 11:04 ` yunhui cui
2025-09-22 13:51 ` Sudeep Holla
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox