public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: arnd@arndb.de, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
	peterz@infradead.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	mark.rutland@arm.com, harisokn@amazon.com, cl@gentwo.org,
	ast@kernel.org, rafael@kernel.org, daniel.lezcano@linaro.org,
	memxor@gmail.com, zhenglifeng1@huawei.com,
	xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com, rdunlap@infradead.org,
	david.laight.linux@gmail.com, joao.m.martins@oracle.com,
	boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, konrad.wilk@oracle.com,
	ashok.bhat@arm.com, Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>
Subject: [PATCH v11 01/14] asm-generic: barrier: Add smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout()
Date: Wed,  8 Apr 2026 17:55:25 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260408122538.3610871-2-ankur.a.arora@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260408122538.3610871-1-ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>

Add smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout(), which extends
smp_cond_load_relaxed() to allow waiting for a duration.

We loop around waiting for the condition variable to change while
peridically doing a time-check. The loop uses cpu_poll_relax() to slow
down the busy-wait, which, unless overridden by the architecture
code, amounts to a cpu_relax().

Note that there are two ways for the time-check to fail: the timeout
case or, @time_expr_ns returning an invalid value (negative or zero).
The second failure mode allows for clocks attached to the clock-domain
of @cond_expr --  which might cease to operate meaningfully once some
state internal to @cond_expr has changed -- to fail.

Evaluation of @time_expr_ns: in the fastpath we want to keep the
performance close to smp_cond_load_relaxed(). So defer evaluation
of the potentially costly @time_expr_ns to the slowpath.

This also means that there will always be some hardware dependent
duration that has passed in cpu_poll_relax() iterations at the time
of first evaluation. Additionally cpu_poll_relax() is not guaranteed
to return at timeout boundary. In sum, expect timeout overshoot when
we exit due to expiration of the timeout.

The number of spin iterations before time-check, SMP_TIMEOUT_POLL_COUNT
is chosen to be 200 by default. With a cpu_poll_relax() iteration
taking ~20-30 cycles (measured on a variety of x86 platforms), we
expect a time-check every ~4000-6000 cycles.

The outer limit of the overshoot is double that when working with the
parameters above. This might be higher or lower depending on the
implementation of cpu_poll_relax() across architectures.

Lastly, config option ARCH_HAS_CPU_RELAX indicates availability of a
cpu_poll_relax() that is cheaper than polling. This might be relevant
for cases with a long timeout.

Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>
---
Notes:
   - add a comment mentioning that smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout() might
     be using architectural primitives that don't support MMIO.
     (David Laight, Catalin Marinas)

 include/asm-generic/barrier.h | 69 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 69 insertions(+)

diff --git a/include/asm-generic/barrier.h b/include/asm-generic/barrier.h
index d4f581c1e21d..e5a6a1c04649 100644
--- a/include/asm-generic/barrier.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/barrier.h
@@ -273,6 +273,75 @@ do {									\
 })
 #endif
 
+/*
+ * Number of times we iterate in the loop before doing the time check.
+ * Note that the iteration count assumes that the loop condition is
+ * relatively cheap.
+ */
+#ifndef SMP_TIMEOUT_POLL_COUNT
+#define SMP_TIMEOUT_POLL_COUNT		200
+#endif
+
+/*
+ * Platforms with ARCH_HAS_CPU_RELAX have a cpu_poll_relax() implementation
+ * that is expected to be cheaper (lower power) than pure polling.
+ */
+#ifndef cpu_poll_relax
+#define cpu_poll_relax(ptr, val, timeout_ns)	cpu_relax()
+#endif
+
+/**
+ * smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout() - (Spin) wait for cond with no ordering
+ * guarantees until a timeout expires.
+ * @ptr: pointer to the variable to wait on.
+ * @cond_expr: boolean expression to wait for.
+ * @time_expr_ns: expression that evaluates to monotonic time (in ns) or,
+ *  on failure, returns a negative value.
+ * @timeout_ns: timeout value in ns
+ * Both of the above are assumed to be compatible with s64; the signed
+ * value is used to handle the failure case in @time_expr_ns.
+ *
+ * Equivalent to using READ_ONCE() on the condition variable.
+ *
+ * Callers that expect to wait for prolonged durations might want
+ * to take into account the availability of ARCH_HAS_CPU_RELAX.
+ *
+ * Note that @ptr is expected to point to a memory address. Using this
+ * interface with MMIO will be slower (since SMP_TIMEOUT_POLL_COUNT is
+ * tuned for memory) and might also break in interesting architecture
+ * dependent ways.
+ */
+#ifndef smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout
+#define smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout(ptr, cond_expr,			\
+				      time_expr_ns, timeout_ns)		\
+({									\
+	typeof(ptr) __PTR = (ptr);					\
+	__unqual_scalar_typeof(*ptr) VAL;				\
+	u32 __n = 0, __spin = SMP_TIMEOUT_POLL_COUNT;			\
+	s64 __timeout = (s64)timeout_ns;				\
+	s64 __time_now, __time_end = 0;					\
+									\
+	for (;;) {							\
+		VAL = READ_ONCE(*__PTR);				\
+		if (cond_expr)						\
+			break;						\
+		cpu_poll_relax(__PTR, VAL, (u64)__timeout);		\
+		if (++__n < __spin)					\
+			continue;					\
+		__time_now = (s64)(time_expr_ns);			\
+		if (unlikely(__time_end == 0))				\
+			__time_end = __time_now + __timeout;		\
+		__timeout = __time_end - __time_now;			\
+		if (__time_now <= 0 || __timeout <= 0) {		\
+			VAL = READ_ONCE(*__PTR);			\
+			break;						\
+		}							\
+		__n = 0;						\
+	}								\
+	(typeof(*ptr))VAL;						\
+})
+#endif
+
 /*
  * pmem_wmb() ensures that all stores for which the modification
  * are written to persistent storage by preceding instructions have
-- 
2.31.1



  reply	other threads:[~2026-04-08 12:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-08 12:25 [PATCH v11 00/14] barrier: Add smp_cond_load_{relaxed,acquire}_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-04-08 12:25 ` Ankur Arora [this message]
2026-04-08 12:25 ` [PATCH v11 02/14] arm64: barrier: Support smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-04-08 12:25 ` [PATCH v11 03/14] arm64/delay: move some constants out to a separate header Ankur Arora
2026-04-08 12:25 ` [PATCH v11 04/14] arm64: support WFET in smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-04-08 12:25 ` [PATCH v11 05/14] arm64: rqspinlock: Remove private copy of smp_cond_load_acquire_timewait() Ankur Arora
2026-04-08 12:25 ` [PATCH v11 06/14] asm-generic: barrier: Add smp_cond_load_acquire_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-04-08 12:25 ` [PATCH v11 07/14] atomic: Add atomic_cond_read_*_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-04-08 12:25 ` [PATCH v11 08/14] locking/atomic: scripts: build atomic_long_cond_read_*_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-04-08 12:25 ` [PATCH v11 09/14] bpf/rqspinlock: switch check_timeout() to a clock interface Ankur Arora
2026-04-08 12:25 ` [PATCH v11 10/14] bpf/rqspinlock: Use smp_cond_load_acquire_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-04-08 12:25 ` [PATCH v11 11/14] sched: add need-resched timed wait interface Ankur Arora
2026-04-08 12:25 ` [PATCH v11 12/14] cpuidle/poll_state: Wait for need-resched via tif_need_resched_relaxed_wait() Ankur Arora
2026-04-20 16:57   ` Okanovic, Haris
2026-04-20 17:50     ` Ankur Arora
2026-04-21  7:15       ` Catalin Marinas
2026-04-20 22:12     ` Christoph Lameter (Ampere)
2026-04-08 12:25 ` [PATCH v11 13/14] kunit: enable testing smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-04-08 12:25 ` [PATCH v11 14/14] kunit: add tests for smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-04-23 17:16 ` [PATCH v11 00/14] barrier: Add smp_cond_load_{relaxed,acquire}_timeout() Andrew Morton
2026-04-23 19:29   ` Ankur Arora
2026-04-24 14:16     ` [PATCH v11 00/14] barrier: Add smp_cond_load_{relaxed, acquire}_timeout() Okanovic, Haris
2026-04-24 14:10   ` Okanovic, Haris
2026-04-24 14:28 ` [PATCH v11 00/14] barrier: Add smp_cond_load_{relaxed,acquire}_timeout() Andrew Morton
2026-04-24 18:10   ` Ankur Arora

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260408122538.3610871-2-ankur.a.arora@oracle.com \
    --to=ankur.a.arora@oracle.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=ashok.bhat@arm.com \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=cl@gentwo.org \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=david.laight.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=harisokn@amazon.com \
    --cc=joao.m.martins@oracle.com \
    --cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=memxor@gmail.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=zhenglifeng1@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox