From: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
bpf@vger.kernel.org
Cc: arnd@arndb.de, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
peterz@infradead.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
mark.rutland@arm.com, harisokn@amazon.com, cl@gentwo.org,
ast@kernel.org, rafael@kernel.org, daniel.lezcano@linaro.org,
memxor@gmail.com, zhenglifeng1@huawei.com,
xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com, rdunlap@infradead.org,
david.laight.linux@gmail.com, joao.m.martins@oracle.com,
boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com, konrad.wilk@oracle.com,
ashok.bhat@arm.com, Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>
Subject: [PATCH v11 01/14] asm-generic: barrier: Add smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout()
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2026 17:55:25 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260408122538.3610871-2-ankur.a.arora@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260408122538.3610871-1-ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>
Add smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout(), which extends
smp_cond_load_relaxed() to allow waiting for a duration.
We loop around waiting for the condition variable to change while
peridically doing a time-check. The loop uses cpu_poll_relax() to slow
down the busy-wait, which, unless overridden by the architecture
code, amounts to a cpu_relax().
Note that there are two ways for the time-check to fail: the timeout
case or, @time_expr_ns returning an invalid value (negative or zero).
The second failure mode allows for clocks attached to the clock-domain
of @cond_expr -- which might cease to operate meaningfully once some
state internal to @cond_expr has changed -- to fail.
Evaluation of @time_expr_ns: in the fastpath we want to keep the
performance close to smp_cond_load_relaxed(). So defer evaluation
of the potentially costly @time_expr_ns to the slowpath.
This also means that there will always be some hardware dependent
duration that has passed in cpu_poll_relax() iterations at the time
of first evaluation. Additionally cpu_poll_relax() is not guaranteed
to return at timeout boundary. In sum, expect timeout overshoot when
we exit due to expiration of the timeout.
The number of spin iterations before time-check, SMP_TIMEOUT_POLL_COUNT
is chosen to be 200 by default. With a cpu_poll_relax() iteration
taking ~20-30 cycles (measured on a variety of x86 platforms), we
expect a time-check every ~4000-6000 cycles.
The outer limit of the overshoot is double that when working with the
parameters above. This might be higher or lower depending on the
implementation of cpu_poll_relax() across architectures.
Lastly, config option ARCH_HAS_CPU_RELAX indicates availability of a
cpu_poll_relax() that is cheaper than polling. This might be relevant
for cases with a long timeout.
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Ankur Arora <ankur.a.arora@oracle.com>
---
Notes:
- add a comment mentioning that smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout() might
be using architectural primitives that don't support MMIO.
(David Laight, Catalin Marinas)
include/asm-generic/barrier.h | 69 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 69 insertions(+)
diff --git a/include/asm-generic/barrier.h b/include/asm-generic/barrier.h
index d4f581c1e21d..e5a6a1c04649 100644
--- a/include/asm-generic/barrier.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/barrier.h
@@ -273,6 +273,75 @@ do { \
})
#endif
+/*
+ * Number of times we iterate in the loop before doing the time check.
+ * Note that the iteration count assumes that the loop condition is
+ * relatively cheap.
+ */
+#ifndef SMP_TIMEOUT_POLL_COUNT
+#define SMP_TIMEOUT_POLL_COUNT 200
+#endif
+
+/*
+ * Platforms with ARCH_HAS_CPU_RELAX have a cpu_poll_relax() implementation
+ * that is expected to be cheaper (lower power) than pure polling.
+ */
+#ifndef cpu_poll_relax
+#define cpu_poll_relax(ptr, val, timeout_ns) cpu_relax()
+#endif
+
+/**
+ * smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout() - (Spin) wait for cond with no ordering
+ * guarantees until a timeout expires.
+ * @ptr: pointer to the variable to wait on.
+ * @cond_expr: boolean expression to wait for.
+ * @time_expr_ns: expression that evaluates to monotonic time (in ns) or,
+ * on failure, returns a negative value.
+ * @timeout_ns: timeout value in ns
+ * Both of the above are assumed to be compatible with s64; the signed
+ * value is used to handle the failure case in @time_expr_ns.
+ *
+ * Equivalent to using READ_ONCE() on the condition variable.
+ *
+ * Callers that expect to wait for prolonged durations might want
+ * to take into account the availability of ARCH_HAS_CPU_RELAX.
+ *
+ * Note that @ptr is expected to point to a memory address. Using this
+ * interface with MMIO will be slower (since SMP_TIMEOUT_POLL_COUNT is
+ * tuned for memory) and might also break in interesting architecture
+ * dependent ways.
+ */
+#ifndef smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout
+#define smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout(ptr, cond_expr, \
+ time_expr_ns, timeout_ns) \
+({ \
+ typeof(ptr) __PTR = (ptr); \
+ __unqual_scalar_typeof(*ptr) VAL; \
+ u32 __n = 0, __spin = SMP_TIMEOUT_POLL_COUNT; \
+ s64 __timeout = (s64)timeout_ns; \
+ s64 __time_now, __time_end = 0; \
+ \
+ for (;;) { \
+ VAL = READ_ONCE(*__PTR); \
+ if (cond_expr) \
+ break; \
+ cpu_poll_relax(__PTR, VAL, (u64)__timeout); \
+ if (++__n < __spin) \
+ continue; \
+ __time_now = (s64)(time_expr_ns); \
+ if (unlikely(__time_end == 0)) \
+ __time_end = __time_now + __timeout; \
+ __timeout = __time_end - __time_now; \
+ if (__time_now <= 0 || __timeout <= 0) { \
+ VAL = READ_ONCE(*__PTR); \
+ break; \
+ } \
+ __n = 0; \
+ } \
+ (typeof(*ptr))VAL; \
+})
+#endif
+
/*
* pmem_wmb() ensures that all stores for which the modification
* are written to persistent storage by preceding instructions have
--
2.31.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-08 12:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-08 12:25 [PATCH v11 00/14] barrier: Add smp_cond_load_{relaxed,acquire}_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-04-08 12:25 ` Ankur Arora [this message]
2026-04-08 12:25 ` [PATCH v11 02/14] arm64: barrier: Support smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-04-08 12:25 ` [PATCH v11 03/14] arm64/delay: move some constants out to a separate header Ankur Arora
2026-04-08 12:25 ` [PATCH v11 04/14] arm64: support WFET in smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-04-08 12:25 ` [PATCH v11 05/14] arm64: rqspinlock: Remove private copy of smp_cond_load_acquire_timewait() Ankur Arora
2026-04-08 12:25 ` [PATCH v11 06/14] asm-generic: barrier: Add smp_cond_load_acquire_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-04-08 12:25 ` [PATCH v11 07/14] atomic: Add atomic_cond_read_*_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-04-08 12:25 ` [PATCH v11 08/14] locking/atomic: scripts: build atomic_long_cond_read_*_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-04-08 12:25 ` [PATCH v11 09/14] bpf/rqspinlock: switch check_timeout() to a clock interface Ankur Arora
2026-04-08 12:25 ` [PATCH v11 10/14] bpf/rqspinlock: Use smp_cond_load_acquire_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-04-08 12:25 ` [PATCH v11 11/14] sched: add need-resched timed wait interface Ankur Arora
2026-04-08 12:25 ` [PATCH v11 12/14] cpuidle/poll_state: Wait for need-resched via tif_need_resched_relaxed_wait() Ankur Arora
2026-04-20 16:57 ` Okanovic, Haris
2026-04-20 17:50 ` Ankur Arora
2026-04-21 7:15 ` Catalin Marinas
2026-04-20 22:12 ` Christoph Lameter (Ampere)
2026-04-08 12:25 ` [PATCH v11 13/14] kunit: enable testing smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-04-08 12:25 ` [PATCH v11 14/14] kunit: add tests for smp_cond_load_relaxed_timeout() Ankur Arora
2026-04-23 17:16 ` [PATCH v11 00/14] barrier: Add smp_cond_load_{relaxed,acquire}_timeout() Andrew Morton
2026-04-23 19:29 ` Ankur Arora
2026-04-24 14:16 ` [PATCH v11 00/14] barrier: Add smp_cond_load_{relaxed, acquire}_timeout() Okanovic, Haris
2026-04-24 14:10 ` Okanovic, Haris
2026-04-24 14:28 ` [PATCH v11 00/14] barrier: Add smp_cond_load_{relaxed,acquire}_timeout() Andrew Morton
2026-04-24 18:10 ` Ankur Arora
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260408122538.3610871-2-ankur.a.arora@oracle.com \
--to=ankur.a.arora@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=ashok.bhat@arm.com \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=cl@gentwo.org \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=david.laight.linux@gmail.com \
--cc=harisokn@amazon.com \
--cc=joao.m.martins@oracle.com \
--cc=konrad.wilk@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=xueshuai@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=zhenglifeng1@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox