[PATCH] gpio: drop bitmap_complement() where feasible

[PATCH] gpio: drop bitmap_complement() where feasible

[Yury Norov]

The gpio drivers reproduce the following pattern:

	bitmap_complement(tmp, data1, nbits);
	bitmap_and(dst, data2, tmp, nbits);

This can be done in a single pass:

	bitmap_andnot(dst, data2, data1t, nbits);

Signed-off-by: Yury Norov <ynorov@nvidia.com>
---
 drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c | 7 ++-----
 drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c  | 6 ++----
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c
index 52e96cc5f67b..1fef733fe1f0 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-pca953x.c
@@ -877,11 +877,9 @@ static void pca953x_irq_bus_sync_unlock(struct irq_data *d)
 	bitmap_or(irq_mask, chip->irq_trig_fall, chip->irq_trig_raise, gc->ngpio);
 	bitmap_or(irq_mask, irq_mask, chip->irq_trig_level_high, gc->ngpio);
 	bitmap_or(irq_mask, irq_mask, chip->irq_trig_level_low, gc->ngpio);
-	bitmap_complement(reg_direction, reg_direction, gc->ngpio);
-	bitmap_and(irq_mask, irq_mask, reg_direction, gc->ngpio);
 
 	/* Look for any newly setup interrupt */
-	for_each_set_bit(level, irq_mask, gc->ngpio)
+	for_each_andnot_bit(level, irq_mask, reg_direction, gc->ngpio)
 		pca953x_gpio_direction_input(&chip->gpio_chip, level);
 
 	mutex_unlock(&chip->irq_lock);
@@ -1005,8 +1003,7 @@ static bool pca953x_irq_pending(struct pca953x_chip *chip, unsigned long *pendin
 	bitmap_and(cur_stat, cur_stat, chip->irq_mask, gc->ngpio);
 	bitmap_or(pending, pending, cur_stat, gc->ngpio);
 
-	bitmap_complement(cur_stat, new_stat, gc->ngpio);
-	bitmap_and(cur_stat, cur_stat, reg_direction, gc->ngpio);
+	bitmap_andnot(cur_stat, reg_direction, new_stat, gc->ngpio);
 	bitmap_and(old_stat, cur_stat, chip->irq_trig_level_low, gc->ngpio);
 	bitmap_and(old_stat, old_stat, chip->irq_mask, gc->ngpio);
 	bitmap_or(pending, pending, old_stat, gc->ngpio);
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c
index be4b4d730547..532205175827 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-xilinx.c
@@ -495,13 +495,11 @@ static void xgpio_irqhandler(struct irq_desc *desc)
 
 	xgpio_read_ch_all(chip, XGPIO_DATA_OFFSET, hw);
 
-	bitmap_complement(rising, chip->last_irq_read, 64);
-	bitmap_and(rising, rising, hw, 64);
+	bitmap_andnot(rising, hw, chip->last_irq_read, 64);
 	bitmap_and(rising, rising, chip->enable, 64);
 	bitmap_and(rising, rising, chip->rising_edge, 64);
 
-	bitmap_complement(falling, hw, 64);
-	bitmap_and(falling, falling, chip->last_irq_read, 64);
+	bitmap_andnot(falling, chip->last_irq_read, hw, 64);
 	bitmap_and(falling, falling, chip->enable, 64);
 	bitmap_and(falling, falling, chip->falling_edge, 64);
 
-- 
2.51.0

Re: [PATCH] gpio: drop bitmap_complement() where feasible

[Andy Shevchenko]

On Thu, Apr 16, 2026 at 11:34:38PM -0400, Yury Norov wrote:
> The gpio drivers reproduce the following pattern:
> 
> 	bitmap_complement(tmp, data1, nbits);
> 	bitmap_and(dst, data2, tmp, nbits);
> 
> This can be done in a single pass:
> 
> 	bitmap_andnot(dst, data2, data1t, nbits);

Split on per-driver basis.
With this being done,
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko

Re: [PATCH] gpio: drop bitmap_complement() where feasible

[Michal Simek]

On 4/17/26 05:34, Yury Norov wrote:
> [Some people who received this message don't often get email from ynorov@nvidia.com. Learn why this is important at https://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification ]
> 
> The gpio drivers reproduce the following pattern:
> 
>          bitmap_complement(tmp, data1, nbits);
>          bitmap_and(dst, data2, tmp, nbits);
> 
> This can be done in a single pass:
> 
>          bitmap_andnot(dst, data2, data1t, nbits);
> 

s/data1t/data1/


Thanks,
Michal