public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@kernel.org>
To: Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@arm.com>
Cc: linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org, keyrings@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
	jarkko@kernel.org, zohar@linux.ibm.com, roberto.sassu@huawei.com,
	dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com, eric.snowberg@oracle.com,
	paul@paul-moore.com, jmorris@namei.org, serge@hallyn.com,
	maz@kernel.org, oupton@kernel.org, joey.gouly@arm.com,
	suzuki.poulose@arm.com, yuzenghui@huawei.com,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] arm64: KVM: defer kvm_init() to finalise_pkvm() when pKVM is enabled
Date: Wed, 6 May 2026 08:50:03 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260506-spirited-impartial-sparrow-66efae@sudeepholla> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260505095409.1948371-2-yeoreum.yun@arm.com>

On Tue, May 05, 2026 at 10:54:07AM +0100, Yeoreum Yun wrote:
> This patch is a preparatory change to address dependency issues
> between the FF-A driver and pKVM.
> 
> kvm_init() should be invoked from finalise_pkvm(),
> as this is the point where pKVM initialisation is finalised and
> the system transitions into the protected mode.
> 
> Deferring kvm_init() ensures that KVM is initialised only after pKVM has
> fully established its protected environment.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@arm.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c  |  8 +++++---
>  arch/arm64/kvm/pkvm.c | 15 ++++++++++++++-
>  2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> index 8bb2c7422cc8..663b1d447a9b 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> @@ -3025,9 +3025,11 @@ static __init int kvm_arm_init(void)
>  	 * FIXME: Do something reasonable if kvm_init() fails after pKVM
>  	 * hypervisor protection is finalized.
>  	 */
> -	err = kvm_init(sizeof(struct kvm_vcpu), 0, THIS_MODULE);
> -	if (err)
> -		goto out_subs;
> +	if (!is_protected_kvm_enabled()) {
> +		err = kvm_init(sizeof(struct kvm_vcpu), 0, THIS_MODULE);
> +		if (err)
> +			goto out_subs;
> +	}
>  
>  	/*
>  	 * This should be called after initialization is done and failure isn't
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/pkvm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/pkvm.c
> index 053e4f733e4b..48b06d384570 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/pkvm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/pkvm.c
> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
>  #include "hyp_constants.h"
>  
>  DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(kvm_protected_mode_initialized);
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_protected_mode_initialized);
>

I am not sure if this is needed when FF-A is built as module. If others
are OK with it, I am fine. But I am thinking if we need to use this in
FF-A driver which can be built-in or a module, we can add
IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_ARM_FFA_*)

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep


  reply	other threads:[~2026-05-06  7:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-05  9:54 [RFC PATCH 0/3] initalise ff-a after finalising pKVM Yeoreum Yun
2026-05-05  9:54 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] arm64: KVM: defer kvm_init() to finalise_pkvm() when pKVM is enabled Yeoreum Yun
2026-05-06  7:50   ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
2026-05-05  9:54 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] firmware: arm_ffa: initialise ff-a after finalising pKVM initialisation Yeoreum Yun
2026-05-05 14:39   ` Sudeep Holla
2026-05-05 15:06     ` Yeoreum Yun
2026-05-05 16:32       ` Sudeep Holla
2026-05-05 16:58         ` Yeoreum Yun
2026-05-06  7:27           ` Sudeep Holla
2026-05-06  7:49             ` Yeoreum Yun
2026-05-06  8:14               ` Sudeep Holla
2026-05-06  8:58                 ` Yeoreum Yun
2026-05-06  9:11                   ` Yeoreum Yun
2026-05-06  9:58                   ` Sudeep Holla
2026-05-06  7:46         ` Sudeep Holla
2026-05-05  9:54 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] security: integrity: call load_uefi_certs() at late_initcall_sync Yeoreum Yun
2026-05-05 10:45 ` [RFC PATCH 0/3] initalise ff-a after finalising pKVM Ben Horgan
2026-05-05 10:51   ` Yeoreum Yun
2026-05-05 11:16     ` Yeoreum Yun
2026-05-05 11:24       ` Ben Horgan
2026-05-05 11:33         ` Yeoreum Yun

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260506-spirited-impartial-sparrow-66efae@sudeepholla \
    --to=sudeep.holla@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com \
    --cc=eric.snowberg@oracle.com \
    --cc=jarkko@kernel.org \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
    --cc=keyrings@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=oupton@kernel.org \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=roberto.sassu@huawei.com \
    --cc=serge@hallyn.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yeoreum.yun@arm.com \
    --cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
    --cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox