From: Leo Yan <leo.yan@arm.com>
To: Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@arm.com>
Cc: coresight@lists.linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, suzuki.poulose@arm.com,
mike.leach@arm.com, james.clark@linaro.org,
alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com, jie.gan@oss.qualcomm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 04/13] coresight: etm4x: exclude ss_status from drvdata->config
Date: Wed, 6 May 2026 09:48:22 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260506084822.GC3778514@e132581.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260422132203.977549-5-yeoreum.yun@arm.com>
On Wed, Apr 22, 2026 at 02:21:54PM +0100, Yeoreum Yun wrote:
[...]
> @@ -573,11 +573,9 @@ static int etm4_enable_hw(struct etmv4_drvdata *drvdata)
> etm4x_relaxed_write32(csa, config->res_ctrl[i], TRCRSCTLRn(i));
>
> for (i = 0; i < caps->nr_ss_cmp; i++) {
> - /* always clear status bit on restart if using single-shot */
> - if (config->ss_ctrl[i] || config->ss_pe_cmp[i])
> - config->ss_status[i] &= ~TRCSSCSRn_STATUS;
> etm4x_relaxed_write32(csa, config->ss_ctrl[i], TRCSSCCRn(i));
> - etm4x_relaxed_write32(csa, config->ss_status[i], TRCSSCSRn(i));
> + /* always clear status and pending bits on restart if using single-shot */
> + etm4x_relaxed_write32(csa, 0x0, TRCSSCSRn(i));
I am not confident what is the right way to handle the pending bit.
I looked a bit Arm ARM but still no clue. In particular, I suspect it
may need to be handled when disabling the trace in etm4_disable_hw().
Let's make it clear with some internal check.
> @@ -1829,8 +1829,8 @@ static ssize_t sshot_ctrl_store(struct device *dev,
> raw_spin_lock(&drvdata->spinlock);
> idx = config->ss_idx;
> config->ss_ctrl[idx] = FIELD_PREP(TRCSSCCRn_SAC_ARC_RST_MASK, val);
> - /* must clear bit 31 in related status register on programming */
> - config->ss_status[idx] &= ~TRCSSCSRn_STATUS;
> + /* must clear bit 31 and 30 in related status register on programming */
> + drvdata->ss_status[idx] &= ~(TRCSSCSRn_STATUS | TRCSSCSRn_PENDING);
Similarly, the question is: if it is in a pending state, how can we
ensure the state machine works properly with the new settings?
> raw_spin_unlock(&drvdata->spinlock);
> return size;
> }
> @@ -1879,8 +1879,8 @@ static ssize_t sshot_pe_ctrl_store(struct device *dev,
> raw_spin_lock(&drvdata->spinlock);
> idx = config->ss_idx;
> config->ss_pe_cmp[idx] = FIELD_PREP(TRCSSPCICRn_PC_MASK, val);
> - /* must clear bit 31 in related status register on programming */
> - config->ss_status[idx] &= ~TRCSSCSRn_STATUS;
> + /* must clear bit 31 and 30 in related status register on programming */
> + drvdata->ss_status[idx] &= ~(TRCSSCSRn_STATUS | TRCSSCSRn_PENDING);
Ditto.
Thanks,
Leo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-06 8:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-22 13:21 [PATCH v6 00/13] fix several inconsistencies with sysfs configuration in etmX Yeoreum Yun
2026-04-22 13:21 ` [PATCH v6 01/13] coresight: etm4x: fix wrong check of etm4x_sspcicrn_present() Yeoreum Yun
2026-04-22 13:21 ` [PATCH v6 02/13] coresight: etm4x: fix underflow for nrseqstate Yeoreum Yun
2026-05-05 16:19 ` Leo Yan
2026-04-22 13:21 ` [PATCH v6 03/13] coresight: etm4x: introduce struct etm4_caps Yeoreum Yun
2026-04-22 13:21 ` [PATCH v6 04/13] coresight: etm4x: exclude ss_status from drvdata->config Yeoreum Yun
2026-05-06 8:48 ` Leo Yan [this message]
2026-04-22 13:21 ` [PATCH v6 05/13] coresight: etm4x: remove redundant fields in etmv4_save_state Yeoreum Yun
2026-04-22 13:21 ` [PATCH v6 06/13] coresight: etm4x: fix leaked trace id Yeoreum Yun
2026-04-22 13:21 ` [PATCH v6 07/13] coresight: etm4x: fix inconsistencies with sysfs configuration Yeoreum Yun
2026-04-22 13:21 ` [PATCH v6 08/13] coresight: etm4x: remove redundant call etm4_enable_hw() with hotplug Yeoreum Yun
2026-04-22 13:21 ` [PATCH v6 09/13] coresight: etm4x: missing cscfg_csdev_disable_active_config() in perf enable Yeoreum Yun
2026-04-22 13:22 ` [PATCH v6 10/13] coresight: etm3x: change drvdata->spinlock type to raw_spin_lock_t Yeoreum Yun
2026-04-22 13:22 ` [PATCH v6 11/13] coresight: etm3x: introduce struct etm_caps Yeoreum Yun
2026-04-22 13:22 ` [PATCH v6 12/13] coresight: etm3x: fix inconsistencies with sysfs configuration Yeoreum Yun
2026-04-22 13:22 ` [PATCH v6 13/13] coresight: etm3x: remove redundant call etm_enable_hw() with hotplug Yeoreum Yun
2026-05-01 12:55 ` [PATCH v6 00/13] fix several inconsistencies with sysfs configuration in etmX Yeoreum Yun
2026-05-01 13:53 ` Leo Yan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260506084822.GC3778514@e132581.arm.com \
--to=leo.yan@arm.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=coresight@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
--cc=jie.gan@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mike.leach@arm.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=yeoreum.yun@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox