From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@kernel.org>
To: arm-scmi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@kernel.org>,
Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 7/9] firmware: arm_scmi: Refactor protocol device creation logic
Date: Mon, 25 May 2026 21:42:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260525-acpi_scmi_pcc-v2-7-4f38938d08d8@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260525-acpi_scmi_pcc-v2-0-4f38938d08d8@arm.com>
Refactor the protocol validation and device creation logic in
scmi_probe() into a new helper function, scmi_device_check_create(),
to improve readability and reduce code duplication.
The new helper consolidates checks for protocol ID range, implementation
availability, and duplicate activation, before invoking
scmi_create_protocol_devices(). This refactor simplifies the SCMI probe
path while preserving existing behavior.
No functional changes intended. This refactoring is required to enable
ACPI PCC transport.
Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@kernel.org>
---
drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c
index 02f14167c918..47f13409dfeb 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/driver.c
@@ -3181,6 +3181,38 @@ static void scmi_enable_matching_quirks(struct scmi_info *info)
rev->sub_vendor_id, rev->impl_ver);
}
+static void scmi_device_check_create(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, int prot_id,
+ struct scmi_info *info)
+{
+ int ret;
+ struct device *dev = info->dev;
+ struct scmi_handle *handle = &info->handle;
+
+ if (!FIELD_FIT(MSG_PROTOCOL_ID_MASK, prot_id))
+ dev_err(dev, "Out of range protocol %d\n", prot_id);
+
+ if (!scmi_is_protocol_implemented(handle, prot_id)) {
+ dev_err(dev, "SCMI protocol %d not implemented\n",
+ prot_id);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * Save this valid fwnode protocol descriptor amongst
+ * @active_protocols for this SCMI instance.
+ */
+ ret = idr_alloc(&info->active_protocols, fwnode,
+ prot_id, prot_id + 1, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (ret != prot_id) {
+ dev_err(dev, "SCMI protocol %d already activated. Skip\n",
+ prot_id);
+ return;
+ }
+
+ fwnode_handle_get(fwnode);
+ scmi_create_protocol_devices(fwnode, info, prot_id, NULL);
+}
+
static int scmi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
int ret;
@@ -3309,29 +3341,7 @@ static int scmi_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
if (fwnode_property_read_u32(child, "reg", &prot_id))
continue;
- if (!FIELD_FIT(MSG_PROTOCOL_ID_MASK, prot_id))
- dev_err(dev, "Out of range protocol %d\n", prot_id);
-
- if (!scmi_is_protocol_implemented(handle, prot_id)) {
- dev_err(dev, "SCMI protocol %d not implemented\n",
- prot_id);
- continue;
- }
-
- /*
- * Save this valid fwnode protocol descriptor amongst
- * @active_protocols for this SCMI instance.
- */
- ret = idr_alloc(&info->active_protocols, child,
- prot_id, prot_id + 1, GFP_KERNEL);
- if (ret != prot_id) {
- dev_err(dev, "SCMI protocol %d already activated. Skip\n",
- prot_id);
- continue;
- }
-
- fwnode_handle_get(child);
- scmi_create_protocol_devices(child, info, prot_id, NULL);
+ scmi_device_check_create(child, prot_id, info);
}
return 0;
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-25 20:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-25 20:42 [PATCH v2 0/9] firmware: arm_scmi: Refactoring and enablement of ACPI PCC transport Sudeep Holla
2026-05-25 20:42 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] firmware: arm_scmi: Fix OF node reference handling Sudeep Holla
2026-05-25 20:42 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] firmware: arm_scmi: Set fwnode for the generated SCMI platform device Sudeep Holla
2026-05-25 20:42 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] firmware: arm_scmi: Extend transport driver macro to support ACPI Sudeep Holla
2026-05-25 20:42 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] firmware: arm_scmi: Convert OF-only paths to generic fwnode in SCMI core Sudeep Holla
2026-05-28 16:32 ` Adam Young
2026-05-25 20:42 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] firmware: arm_scmi: Fall back to ACPI HID when "compatible" is absent Sudeep Holla
2026-05-25 20:42 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] firmware: arm_scmi: Pass protocol ID to chan_available() transport callback Sudeep Holla
2026-05-25 20:42 ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
2026-05-25 20:42 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] firmware: arm_scmi: transport: Add ACPI PCC transport Sudeep Holla
2026-05-28 17:29 ` Adam Young
2026-05-25 20:42 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] firmware: arm_scmi: Initialise all protocol devices and transport channels Sudeep Holla
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260525-acpi_scmi_pcc-v2-7-4f38938d08d8@arm.com \
--to=sudeep.holla@kernel.org \
--cc=arm-scmi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=cristian.marussi@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox