From: Pranjal Shrivastava <praan@google.com>
To: iommu@lists.linux.dev
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
Mostafa Saleh <smostafa@google.com>,
Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>,
Daniel Mentz <danielmentz@google.com>,
Ashish Mhetre <amhetre@nvidia.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Pranjal Shrivastava <praan@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v8 11/12] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Invoke pm_runtime before hw access
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2026 21:59:08 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260601215909.3958732-12-praan@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260601215909.3958732-1-praan@google.com>
Invoke the pm_runtime helpers at all places before accessing the hw.
The idea is to invoke runtime_pm helpers at common points which are used
by exposed ops or interrupt handlers. TLB and CFG invalidations are
elided if the SMMU is suspended by observing the CMDQ_PROD_STOP_FLAG.
Signed-off-by: Pranjal Shrivastava <praan@google.com>
---
.../arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-iommufd.c | 10 +-
drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c | 101 ++++++++++++++++--
drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h | 5 +-
3 files changed, 108 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-iommufd.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-iommufd.c
index 1e9f7d2de344..2d729034e3bb 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-iommufd.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-iommufd.c
@@ -15,6 +15,11 @@ void *arm_smmu_hw_info(struct device *dev, u32 *length,
struct iommu_hw_info_arm_smmuv3 *info;
u32 __iomem *base_idr;
unsigned int i;
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = arm_smmu_rpm_get(master->smmu);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return ERR_PTR(-EIO);
if (*type != IOMMU_HW_INFO_TYPE_DEFAULT &&
*type != IOMMU_HW_INFO_TYPE_ARM_SMMUV3) {
@@ -24,8 +29,10 @@ void *arm_smmu_hw_info(struct device *dev, u32 *length,
}
info = kzalloc_obj(*info);
- if (!info)
+ if (!info) {
+ arm_smmu_rpm_put(master->smmu);
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
+ }
base_idr = master->smmu->base + ARM_SMMU_IDR0;
for (i = 0; i <= 5; i++)
@@ -36,6 +43,7 @@ void *arm_smmu_hw_info(struct device *dev, u32 *length,
*length = sizeof(*info);
*type = IOMMU_HW_INFO_TYPE_ARM_SMMUV3;
+ arm_smmu_rpm_put(master->smmu);
return info;
}
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
index 24a1bcc8974f..2e260f85b8fd 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c
@@ -112,7 +112,7 @@ static int arm_smmu_alloc_cd_tables(struct arm_smmu_master *master);
static bool arm_smmu_ats_supported(struct arm_smmu_master *master);
/* Runtime PM helpers */
-__maybe_unused static int arm_smmu_rpm_get(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
+int arm_smmu_rpm_get(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
{
int ret;
@@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ __maybe_unused static int arm_smmu_rpm_get(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
return 0;
}
-__maybe_unused static void arm_smmu_rpm_put(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
+void arm_smmu_rpm_put(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
{
int ret;
@@ -983,7 +983,9 @@ static void arm_smmu_page_response(struct device *dev, struct iopf_fault *unused
struct iommu_page_response *resp)
{
struct arm_smmu_master *master = dev_iommu_priv_get(dev);
+ struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = master->smmu;
u8 resume_resp;
+ int ret;
if (WARN_ON(!master->stall_enabled))
return;
@@ -1001,6 +1003,25 @@ static void arm_smmu_page_response(struct device *dev, struct iopf_fault *unused
break;
}
+ /*
+ * The SMMU is guaranteed to be active via device_link if any master is
+ * active. Furthermore, on suspend we set GBPA to abort, flushing any
+ * pending stalled transactions.
+ *
+ * Receiving a page fault while suspended implies a bug in the power
+ * dependency chain or a stale event. Since the SMMU is powered down
+ * and the command queue is inaccessible, we cannot issue the
+ * RESUME command and must drop it.
+ */
+ if (arm_smmu_cmdq_can_elide(smmu)) {
+ dev_err(smmu->dev, "Ignoring page fault while suspended\n");
+ return;
+ }
+
+ ret = arm_smmu_rpm_get(smmu);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return;
+
arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmd(master->smmu,
arm_smmu_make_cmd_resume(master->streams[0].id,
resp->grpid,
@@ -1011,6 +1032,7 @@ static void arm_smmu_page_response(struct device *dev, struct iopf_fault *unused
* terminated... at some point in the future. PRI_RESP is fire and
* forget.
*/
+ arm_smmu_rpm_put(smmu);
}
/* Invalidation array manipulation functions */
@@ -1536,7 +1558,6 @@ static void arm_smmu_sync_cd(struct arm_smmu_master *master,
smmu, &cmds,
arm_smmu_make_cmd_cfgi_cd(master->streams[i].id, ssid,
leaf));
-
arm_smmu_cmdq_batch_submit(smmu, &cmds);
}
@@ -1828,9 +1849,9 @@ static void arm_smmu_ste_writer_sync_entry(struct arm_smmu_entry_writer *writer)
{
struct arm_smmu_ste_writer *ste_writer =
container_of(writer, struct arm_smmu_ste_writer, writer);
+ struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = writer->master->smmu;
- arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmd_with_sync(
- writer->master->smmu,
+ arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmd_with_sync(smmu,
arm_smmu_make_cmd_cfgi_ste(ste_writer->sid, true));
}
@@ -2230,6 +2251,7 @@ static void arm_smmu_dump_event(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu, u64 *raw,
static irqreturn_t arm_smmu_evtq_thread(int irq, void *dev)
{
+ int ret;
u64 evt[EVTQ_ENT_DWORDS];
struct arm_smmu_event event = {0};
struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = dev;
@@ -2238,6 +2260,10 @@ static irqreturn_t arm_smmu_evtq_thread(int irq, void *dev)
static DEFINE_RATELIMIT_STATE(rs, DEFAULT_RATELIMIT_INTERVAL,
DEFAULT_RATELIMIT_BURST);
+ ret = arm_smmu_rpm_get(smmu);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return IRQ_NONE;
+
do {
while (!queue_remove_raw(q, evt)) {
arm_smmu_decode_event(smmu, evt, &event);
@@ -2258,6 +2284,7 @@ static irqreturn_t arm_smmu_evtq_thread(int irq, void *dev)
/* Sync our overflow flag, as we believe we're up to speed */
queue_sync_cons_ovf(q);
+ arm_smmu_rpm_put(smmu);
return IRQ_HANDLED;
}
@@ -2295,6 +2322,11 @@ static irqreturn_t arm_smmu_priq_thread(int irq, void *dev)
struct arm_smmu_queue *q = &smmu->priq.q;
struct arm_smmu_ll_queue *llq = &q->llq;
u64 evt[PRIQ_ENT_DWORDS];
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = arm_smmu_rpm_get(smmu);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return IRQ_NONE;
do {
while (!queue_remove_raw(q, evt))
@@ -2306,6 +2338,7 @@ static irqreturn_t arm_smmu_priq_thread(int irq, void *dev)
/* Sync our overflow flag, as we believe we're up to speed */
queue_sync_cons_ovf(q);
+ arm_smmu_rpm_put(smmu);
return IRQ_HANDLED;
}
@@ -2361,8 +2394,33 @@ static irqreturn_t arm_smmu_handle_gerror(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
static irqreturn_t arm_smmu_gerror_handler(int irq, void *dev)
{
struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = dev;
+ irqreturn_t ret;
+
+ /*
+ * Global Errors are only processed if the SMMU is active.
+ *
+ * If the STOP_FLAG is set (can_elide == true), the hardware is
+ * either already disabled or in the process of being disabled.
+ * Any errors captured during the quiesce/drain phase will be
+ * handled by the explicit arm_smmu_handle_gerror() call at the
+ * end of arm_smmu_runtime_suspend() callback. On resume, the
+ * STOP_FLAG is cleared before interrupts are re-enabled, ensuring
+ * no valid errors are missed.
+ *
+ * A lockless check is favoured here over a dynamic PM core check
+ * since the runtime_pm_get_if_active would return false during
+ * transient states like RPM_RESUMING & ignore level-triggered
+ * interrupts.
+ */
+ if (arm_smmu_cmdq_can_elide(smmu)) {
+ dev_err(smmu->dev,
+ "Ignoring gerror interrupt because the SMMU is suspended\n");
+ return IRQ_NONE;
+ }
+
+ ret = arm_smmu_handle_gerror(smmu);
- return arm_smmu_handle_gerror(smmu);
+ return ret;
}
static irqreturn_t arm_smmu_combined_irq_thread(int irq, void *dev)
@@ -2445,6 +2503,10 @@ static int arm_smmu_atc_inv_master(struct arm_smmu_master *master,
struct arm_smmu_cmd cmd;
struct arm_smmu_cmdq_batch cmds;
+ /* Shouldn't hit the WARN if there's no devlink inconsistency */
+ if (WARN_ON_ONCE(arm_smmu_cmdq_can_elide(master->smmu)))
+ return 0;
+
cmd = arm_smmu_make_cmd_atc_inv_all(0, IOMMU_NO_PASID);
arm_smmu_cmdq_batch_init_cmd(master->smmu, &cmds, &cmd);
for (i = 0; i < master->num_streams; i++)
@@ -2690,7 +2752,16 @@ static void __arm_smmu_domain_inv_range(struct arm_smmu_invs *invs,
if (cmds.num &&
(next == end || arm_smmu_invs_end_batch(cur, next))) {
+
+ /*
+ * Concurrent suspend races are benign: the cmdq allocation cmpxchg
+ * loop acts as the serialization point to safely drop the batch
+ * without MMIO accesses. Concurrent resume is caught by the HW
+ * reset cache invalidation, ensuring state consistency.
+ */
arm_smmu_cmdq_batch_submit(smmu, &cmds);
+
+ /* Drop this batch to ensure the next one's fresh */
cmds.num = 0;
}
cur = next;
@@ -2703,6 +2774,9 @@ void arm_smmu_domain_inv_range(struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain,
{
struct arm_smmu_invs *invs;
+ if (arm_smmu_cmdq_can_elide(smmu_domain->smmu))
+ return;
+
/*
* An invalidation request must follow some IOPTE change and then load
* an invalidation array. In the meantime, a domain attachment mutates
@@ -5631,10 +5705,19 @@ static int arm_smmu_device_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
static void arm_smmu_device_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+ int ret;
iommu_device_unregister(&smmu->iommu);
iommu_device_sysfs_remove(&smmu->iommu);
+
+ ret = arm_smmu_rpm_get(smmu);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ goto free_iopf;
+
arm_smmu_device_disable(smmu);
+ arm_smmu_rpm_put(smmu);
+
+free_iopf:
iopf_queue_free(smmu->evtq.iopf);
ida_destroy(&smmu->vmid_map);
}
@@ -5642,8 +5725,14 @@ static void arm_smmu_device_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
static void arm_smmu_device_shutdown(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
+ int ret;
+
+ ret = arm_smmu_rpm_get(smmu);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ return;
arm_smmu_device_disable(smmu);
+ arm_smmu_rpm_put(smmu);
}
static int __maybe_unused arm_smmu_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
index 51a3281a1e46..0bd5ad2670e0 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
@@ -1230,11 +1230,14 @@ int arm_smmu_cmdq_issue_cmdlist(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu,
* If we lose the race, that loop observes Q_STOP == 1 and safely
* drops the command. If we win, the suspend thread waits for us.
*/
-static inline bool arm_smmu_can_elide(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
+static inline bool arm_smmu_cmdq_can_elide(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
{
return !!Q_STOP(READ_ONCE(smmu->cmdq.q.llq.prod));
}
+int arm_smmu_rpm_get(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu);
+void arm_smmu_rpm_put(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu);
+
#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_SMMU_V3_SVA
bool arm_smmu_sva_supported(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu);
void arm_smmu_sva_notifier_synchronize(void);
--
2.54.0.1013.g208068f2d8-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-01 21:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-01 21:58 [PATCH v8 00/10] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Implement Runtime/System Sleep ops Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-06-01 21:58 ` [PATCH v8 01/12] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Refactor arm_smmu_setup_irqs Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-06-01 21:58 ` [PATCH v8 02/12] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add a helper to drain cmd queues Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-06-02 0:12 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-06-02 3:28 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-06-02 5:21 ` Daniel Mentz
2026-06-01 21:59 ` [PATCH v8 03/12] iommu/tegra241-cmdqv: Add a helper to drain VCMDQs Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-06-01 21:59 ` [PATCH v8 04/12] iommu/tegra241-cmdqv: Restore PROD and CONS after resume Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-06-01 21:59 ` [PATCH v8 05/12] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Cache and restore MSI config Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-06-01 21:59 ` [PATCH v8 06/12] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Handle gerror during suspend Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-06-02 0:15 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-06-02 3:31 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-06-01 21:59 ` [PATCH v8 07/12] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add CMDQ_PROD_STOP_FLAG to gate CMDQ submissions Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-06-01 21:59 ` [PATCH v8 08/12] iommu/tegra241-cmdqv: Add a helper to quiesce VCMDQs Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-06-02 0:14 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-06-02 3:37 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-06-02 5:59 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-06-02 6:21 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-06-02 6:29 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-06-01 21:59 ` [PATCH v8 09/12] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Implement pm_runtime & system sleep ops Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-06-02 5:25 ` Daniel Mentz
2026-06-01 21:59 ` [PATCH v8 10/12] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Enable pm_runtime and setup devlinks Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-06-01 21:59 ` Pranjal Shrivastava [this message]
2026-06-02 0:24 ` [PATCH v8 11/12] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Invoke pm_runtime before hw access Nicolin Chen
2026-06-02 3:59 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-06-02 5:51 ` Nicolin Chen
2026-06-02 6:24 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-06-01 21:59 ` [PATCH v8 12/12] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add KUnit unit tests for Runtime PM Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-06-02 6:03 ` [PATCH v8 00/10] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Implement Runtime/System Sleep ops Nicolin Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260601215909.3958732-12-praan@google.com \
--to=praan@google.com \
--cc=amhetre@nvidia.com \
--cc=danielmentz@google.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=smostafa@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox