Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v2] ARM: enable interrupts when unhandled user faults are triggered
@ 2026-06-29 12:33 Xie Yuanbin
  2026-06-29 12:48 ` Xie Yuanbin
  2026-06-29 13:14 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Xie Yuanbin @ 2026-06-29 12:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux, bigeasy, clrkwllms, rostedt, rmk+kernel, linusw, arnd
  Cc: linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, linux-rt-devel, liaohua4,
	lilinjie8, Xie Yuanbin

PREEMPT_RT requires interrupts to be enabled when sending signals.

When do_DataAbort()/do_PrefetchAbort() triggers unhandled user faults,
that is `inf->fn()` return a non-zero value, and the interrupts are not
enabled within the hook function, force_sig_fault() will be called
with interrupts disabled.

This can be triggered by user programs executing the bkpt instruction,
with kernel config CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS=n.

Enable interrupts in do_DataAbort()/do_PrefetchAbort() when unhandled
user faults are triggered to fix the issue.

Fixes: c6e61c06d606 ("ARM: 9463/1: Allow to enable RT")

Suggested-by: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
Suggested-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Xie Yuanbin <xieyuanbin1@huawei.com>
---
v1->v2: https://lore.kernel.org/20260625073522.182503-1-xieyuanbin1@huawei.com
  - Move local_irq_enable() from arm_notify_die() to
    do_DataAbort()/do_PrefetchAbort()

 arch/arm/mm/fault.c | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/fault.c b/arch/arm/mm/fault.c
index e62cc4be5adf..c68677503532 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mm/fault.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mm/fault.c
@@ -633,6 +633,9 @@ do_DataAbort(unsigned long addr, unsigned int fsr, struct pt_regs *regs)
 	if (!inf->fn(addr, fsr & ~FSR_LNX_PF, regs))
 		return;
 
+	if (likely(user_mode(regs)))
+		local_irq_enable();
+
 	pr_alert("8<--- cut here ---\n");
 	pr_alert("Unhandled fault: %s (0x%03x) at 0x%08lx\n",
 		inf->name, fsr, addr);
@@ -663,6 +666,9 @@ do_PrefetchAbort(unsigned long addr, unsigned int ifsr, struct pt_regs *regs)
 	if (!inf->fn(addr, ifsr | FSR_LNX_PF, regs))
 		return;
 
+	if (likely(user_mode(regs)))
+		local_irq_enable();
+
 	pr_alert("8<--- cut here ---\n");
 	pr_alert("Unhandled prefetch abort: %s (0x%03x) at 0x%08lx\n",
 		inf->name, ifsr, addr);
-- 
2.53.0



^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: enable interrupts when unhandled user faults are triggered
  2026-06-29 12:33 [PATCH v2] ARM: enable interrupts when unhandled user faults are triggered Xie Yuanbin
@ 2026-06-29 12:48 ` Xie Yuanbin
  2026-06-29 13:12   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
  2026-06-29 13:14 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Xie Yuanbin @ 2026-06-29 12:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: bigeasy, linux, rmk+kernel
  Cc: xieyuanbin1, arnd, clrkwllms, liaohua4, lilinjie8, linusw,
	linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, linux-rt-devel, rostedt

On Mon, 29 Jun 2026 11:40:22 +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> If this is moved to the callers of arm_notify_die() then I don't know
> what to do about baddataabort(). It looks like it gets invoked with
> disabled interrupts, too but I'm not sure. This looks like pre ARM v7.
> Is it reasonable to add such a check there?

Oh, I'm not sure about this place either. Would interrupts here be
disabled? I'm not familiar with the entry assembly code of v4t, so
I don't know how to construct a user-space program that can run to
baddataabort(), and I also don't have a v4t device to test it.


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: enable interrupts when unhandled user faults are triggered
  2026-06-29 12:48 ` Xie Yuanbin
@ 2026-06-29 13:12   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior @ 2026-06-29 13:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Xie Yuanbin
  Cc: linux, rmk+kernel, arnd, clrkwllms, liaohua4, lilinjie8, linusw,
	linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, linux-rt-devel, rostedt

On 2026-06-29 20:48:16 [+0800], Xie Yuanbin wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Jun 2026 11:40:22 +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> > If this is moved to the callers of arm_notify_die() then I don't know
> > what to do about baddataabort(). It looks like it gets invoked with
> > disabled interrupts, too but I'm not sure. This looks like pre ARM v7.
> > Is it reasonable to add such a check there?
> 
> Oh, I'm not sure about this place either. Would interrupts here be
> disabled? I'm not familiar with the entry assembly code of v4t, so
> I don't know how to construct a user-space program that can run to
> baddataabort(), and I also don't have a v4t device to test it.

I don't have anything myself but it follows the same pattern.
Sashiko just reported that it is a pre-existing issue :)

Sebastian


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: enable interrupts when unhandled user faults are triggered
  2026-06-29 12:33 [PATCH v2] ARM: enable interrupts when unhandled user faults are triggered Xie Yuanbin
  2026-06-29 12:48 ` Xie Yuanbin
@ 2026-06-29 13:14 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior @ 2026-06-29 13:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Xie Yuanbin
  Cc: linux, clrkwllms, rostedt, rmk+kernel, linusw, arnd,
	linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, linux-rt-devel, liaohua4,
	lilinjie8

On 2026-06-29 20:33:49 [+0800], Xie Yuanbin wrote:
> PREEMPT_RT requires interrupts to be enabled when sending signals.
> 
> When do_DataAbort()/do_PrefetchAbort() triggers unhandled user faults,
> that is `inf->fn()` return a non-zero value, and the interrupts are not
> enabled within the hook function, force_sig_fault() will be called
> with interrupts disabled.
> 
> This can be triggered by user programs executing the bkpt instruction,
> with kernel config CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS=n.
> 
> Enable interrupts in do_DataAbort()/do_PrefetchAbort() when unhandled
> user faults are triggered to fix the issue.
> 
> Fixes: c6e61c06d606 ("ARM: 9463/1: Allow to enable RT")
> 
> Suggested-by: Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>
> Suggested-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
> Signed-off-by: Xie Yuanbin <xieyuanbin1@huawei.com>

Reviewed-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>

This fixes the issue that can be easily triggered.

Sebastian


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2026-06-29 13:14 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-06-29 12:33 [PATCH v2] ARM: enable interrupts when unhandled user faults are triggered Xie Yuanbin
2026-06-29 12:48 ` Xie Yuanbin
2026-06-29 13:12   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-06-29 13:14 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox