Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@kernel.org>
To: Sneh Mankad <sneh.mankad@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@oss.qualcomm.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Pavel Machek <pavel@kernel.org>, Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arm64: Disallow disabling boot CPU based on config
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2026 16:51:43 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260703-competent-adaptable-coot-f8daaf@sudeepholla> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260703-disable_boot_cpu_offline-v2-1-782d16ff58c3@oss.qualcomm.com>

(It is always good to cc all PSCI maintainer for any ARM64 CPU
hotpug/suspend related changes)

On Fri, Jul 03, 2026 at 04:50:02PM +0530, Sneh Mankad wrote:
> The Qualcomm SoCs like LeMans, Monaco support suspend to ram which leads
> the SoC to ACPI S3 similar state where SoC is turned off and DDR is
> retained. The hardware design on these SoCs forces a constraint to suspend
> and resume the system on boot CPU / CPU0.
>
And you fail to explain why they have that constraint.

Is it because some secure context is not allowed to migrate ?

We already have a mechanism for that in place and this hack is not at all
required.

-- 
Regards,
Sudeep


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-07-03 15:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-03 11:20 [PATCH v2] arm64: Disallow disabling boot CPU based on config Sneh Mankad
2026-07-03 14:28 ` Mark Rutland
2026-07-03 21:09   ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-07-03 15:51 ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
2026-07-04  6:43   ` Daniel Lezcano

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260703-competent-adaptable-coot-f8daaf@sudeepholla \
    --to=sudeep.holla@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=lenb@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=pavel@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=sneh.mankad@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=tglx@kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox