From: Jiaxing Hu <huhuvmb88@gmail.com>
To: "Heiko Stübner" <heiko@sntech.de>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu/rockchip: implement .flush_iotlb_all
Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2026 09:11:05 +1200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260710211105.9782-1-huhuvmb88@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260710111508.917486-1-huhuvmb88@gmail.com>
On Fri, 10 Jul 2026, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> accel/rocket is in mainline, so I guess the interesting question is, why
> are you expecting your changes to be (stay?) out of tree?
Thanks. I had been treating it as exploratory: single-layer inference runs
on the open stack (rocket + Teflon) on RK3576, but chained inference does
not, and I narrowed the failure to below the software surface
(fixed-function hardware I cannot reach from an open board), so it felt too
unfinished to send.
But you are right that an RFC is the better way to handle it. I will clean
up the RK3576 bring-up (power domains, clocks, IOMMU, DPU/RDMA, DTS) into
an RFC against current mainline and post it, with the chained-task
limitation described honestly. If you can point me at who else is working
on the RK3576 NPU, I would be glad to compare notes.
Thanks,
Jiaxing
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-10 21:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-10 6:05 [PATCH] iommu/rockchip: implement .flush_iotlb_all Jiaxing Hu
2026-07-10 10:59 ` Will Deacon
2026-07-10 12:11 ` Robin Murphy
2026-07-10 11:15 ` Jiaxing Hu
2026-07-10 13:42 ` Heiko Stübner
2026-07-10 21:11 ` Jiaxing Hu [this message]
2026-07-10 21:23 ` Jiaxing Hu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260710211105.9782-1-huhuvmb88@gmail.com \
--to=huhuvmb88@gmail.com \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox