* [PATCH v2] arm64/mm: Check the requested PFN range during memory removal
@ 2026-07-21 10:00 Richard Cheng
2026-07-21 17:18 ` Will Deacon
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Richard Cheng @ 2026-07-21 10:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: catalin.marinas, will, jic23
Cc: ryan.roberts, ardb, kevin.brodsky, anshuman.khandual, yang,
chaitanyas.prakash, linux-arm-kernel, linux-kernel, linux-cxl,
newtonl, kristinc, mochs, kaihengf, kobak, Richard Cheng
prevent_memory_remove_notifier() advances pfn while scanning the requested
range for early memory. When the loop completes, pfn is at or beyond
end_pfn. Passing it to can_unmap_without_split() therefore checks a range
after the one being offlined.
Consequently, a valid request can be rejected based on the following
range, while a request that would split a leaf mapping can be accepted if
the shifted range can be unmapped without a split. This was observed with
CXL DAX memory, where the final memory block was incorrectly allowed to
be offlined.
Pass arg->start_pfn into can_unmap_without_split() so it checks the
requested range.
Fixes: 95a58852b0e5 ("arm64/mm: Reject memory removal that splits a kernel leaf mapping")
Signed-off-by: Richard Cheng <icheng@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
---
Changelog:
V1->v2:
- Fix the typo in the subject
- Clarify how pfn advances and which range was incorrectly checked
The bug occurred on a machine with CXL Type-3 device.
Branch: cxl-next
Before 95a58852b0e5:
"""
$ sudo echo offline > memory557056/state
write error: Operation not permitted
$ sudo dmesg
---[snip]---
[440008000000 440010000000] splits a leaf entry in linear map
$ sudo echo offline > memory558079/state
$ cat memory558079/state
offline
"""
After:
"""
$ sudo echo offline > memory557056/state
write error: Operation not permitted
[440000000000 440008000000] splits a leaf entry in linear map
$ sudo echo offline > memory558079/state
write error: Operation not permitted
[441ff8000000 442000000000] splits a leaf entry in linear map
"""
My fix corrects the checked range and prevents the false acceptance.
Best regards,
Richard Cheng.
---
arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
index a25d8beacc83..18a8b0d3714e 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/mm/mmu.c
@@ -2194,7 +2194,7 @@ static int prevent_memory_remove_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
}
}
- if (!can_unmap_without_split(pfn, arg->nr_pages))
+ if (!can_unmap_without_split(arg->start_pfn, arg->nr_pages))
return NOTIFY_BAD;
return NOTIFY_OK;
base-commit: 5ca04f3ba91f1773bbd5da6d9c654ccc1ba7831d
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] arm64/mm: Check the requested PFN range during memory removal
2026-07-21 10:00 [PATCH v2] arm64/mm: Check the requested PFN range during memory removal Richard Cheng
@ 2026-07-21 17:18 ` Will Deacon
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Will Deacon @ 2026-07-21 17:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: catalin.marinas, jic23, Richard Cheng
Cc: kernel-team, Will Deacon, ryan.roberts, ardb, kevin.brodsky,
anshuman.khandual, yang, chaitanyas.prakash, linux-arm-kernel,
linux-kernel, linux-cxl, newtonl, kristinc, mochs, kaihengf,
kobak
On Tue, 21 Jul 2026 18:00:26 +0800, Richard Cheng wrote:
> prevent_memory_remove_notifier() advances pfn while scanning the requested
> range for early memory. When the loop completes, pfn is at or beyond
> end_pfn. Passing it to can_unmap_without_split() therefore checks a range
> after the one being offlined.
>
> Consequently, a valid request can be rejected based on the following
> range, while a request that would split a leaf mapping can be accepted if
> the shifted range can be unmapped without a split. This was observed with
> CXL DAX memory, where the final memory block was incorrectly allowed to
> be offlined.
>
> [...]
Applied to arm64 (for-next/fixes), thanks!
[1/1] arm64/mm: Check the requested PFN range during memory removal
https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/285f90a4d1141
Cheers,
--
Will
https://fixes.arm64.dev
https://next.arm64.dev
https://will.arm64.dev
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-07-21 17:22 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-07-21 10:00 [PATCH v2] arm64/mm: Check the requested PFN range during memory removal Richard Cheng
2026-07-21 17:18 ` Will Deacon
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox