From: Leo Yan <leo.yan@arm.com>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: Mohamed Ayman <mohamedaymanworkspace@gmail.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Mike Leach <mike.leach@arm.com>,
James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Clark Williams <clrkwllms@kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/CORESIGHT FRAMEWORK AND DRIVERS"
<coresight@lists.linaro.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/CORESIGHT FRAMEWORK AND DRIVERS"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:Real-time Linux (PREEMPT_RT):Keyword:PREEMPT_RT"
<linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] coresight: Fix scheduling while atomic in coresight_cpu_pm_notify()
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2026 15:57:32 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260721145732.GL3998092@e132581.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260717161201.3jkO5o71@linutronix.de>
On Fri, Jul 17, 2026 at 06:12:01PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
[...]
> > The raw spinlock (coresight_dev_lock) serializes access to the per-CPU
> > csdev_source pointer. It does not guarantee the lifetime of the source
> > or its _parent_ device. coresight_unregister() is not only reached from
> > module unload; it can also be called when a driver is unbind, for
> > example DT overlay removal or device hotplug/unplug.
>
> But doesn't coresight_unregister() block on the coresight_dev_lock here?
Fair point.
coresight_cpu_get_active_path() can safely access the source while
holding coresight_dev_lock. Unregistration will be blocked until the
access from the CPU PM notifier has finished.
> > I think a proper fix needs a clearer lifetime model for an active
> > session. E.g., we could consider to call device_link_add() to prevent
> > device unbind / unregister, and unlink device when the session is
> > finished. Once that is in place, the CPU PM notifier can safely use the
> > active path without get_device()/put_device() pair anymore.
>
> Right. I am also not sure about lifetime of coresight_device::path.
coresight_device::path is a runtime pointer that is valid only while
the device is enabled.
Since both the path and the device mode are updated atomically on the
local CPU, observing the device mode as enabled guarantees that the
corresponding coresight_device::path is valid.
Thanks,
Leo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-21 14:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-12 21:04 [PATCH] coresight: Fix scheduling while atomic in coresight_device_release() Mohamed Ayman
2026-07-13 3:07 ` Jie Gan
2026-07-13 23:00 ` [PATCH v2] coresight: Fix scheduling while atomic in coresight_put_percpu_source_ref() Mohamed Ayman
2026-07-14 10:42 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-07-14 19:42 ` MOHAMED AYMAN
2026-07-15 6:58 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-07-16 3:07 ` MOHAMED AYMAN
2026-07-16 12:32 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-07-16 21:41 ` [PATCH v3] coresight: Fix scheduling while atomic in coresight_cpu_pm_notify() Mohamed Ayman
2026-07-17 8:14 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-07-17 10:49 ` Leo Yan
2026-07-17 15:58 ` Leo Yan
2026-07-17 16:12 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2026-07-19 9:33 ` MOHAMED AYMAN
2026-07-21 14:57 ` Leo Yan [this message]
2026-07-21 15:21 ` Leo Yan
2026-07-22 4:30 ` [PATCH v4] " Mohamed Ayman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260721145732.GL3998092@e132581.arm.com \
--to=leo.yan@arm.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=clrkwllms@kernel.org \
--cc=coresight@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-devel@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=mike.leach@arm.com \
--cc=mohamedaymanworkspace@gmail.com \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox