Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	 Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Oliver Upton <oupton@kernel.org>,
	 Fuad Tabba <fuad.tabba@linux.dev>,
	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
	 linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	 linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 07/11] kselftest/arm64: Remove the sched_yield()s from the fp-stress loads
Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2026 18:06:47 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260901-arm64-fp-stress-kvm-v1-7-31bce995b49b@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260901-arm64-fp-stress-kvm-v1-0-31bce995b49b@kernel.org>

The fp-stress load programs call sched_yield() on each iteration of
their test loops in order to encourage preemption, except for sve-test
where the call is commented out since the SVE state is destroyed by
system calls. This is most likely counterproductive since we are more
likely to notice corruption if preemption happens while setting or
reading the register state, and since fp-stress starts multiple test
programs per CPU we should have no trouble observing preemption anyway.

Remove these calls, including the commented out one in sve-test, both
due to this and in order to prepare for running as KVM guests.

We also remove the inclusions of unistd.h since we no longer need it in
any of the programs. za-test had an unreferenced local label in the
middle of the sched_yield(), remove that too.

Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/fpsimd-test.S | 5 -----
 tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/sve-test.S    | 5 -----
 tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/za-test.S     | 5 -----
 tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/zt-test.S     | 4 ----
 4 files changed, 19 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/fpsimd-test.S b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/fpsimd-test.S
index df040283d076..5e19799f1b2e 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/fpsimd-test.S
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/fpsimd-test.S
@@ -10,7 +10,6 @@
 // (leave it running for as long as you want...)
 // kill $pids
 
-#include <asm/unistd.h>
 #include "assembler.h"
 #include "asm-offsets.h"
 
@@ -185,10 +184,6 @@ function main
 	cmp	x21, #NVR
 	b.lo	0b
 
-// Can't do this when SVE state is volatile across SVC:
-	mov	x8, #__NR_sched_yield	// Encourage preemption
-	svc	#0
-
 	mov	x21, #0
 0:	mov	x0, x21
 	bl	check_vreg
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/sve-test.S b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/sve-test.S
index c7d9514f964e..fdb295bde45c 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/sve-test.S
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/sve-test.S
@@ -10,7 +10,6 @@
 // (leave it running for as long as you want...)
 // kill $pids
 
-#include <asm/unistd.h>
 #include "assembler.h"
 #include "asm-offsets.h"
 #include "sme-inst.h"
@@ -378,10 +377,6 @@ function main
 	cmp	x21, #NZR + NPR
 	b.lo	0b
 
-// Can't do this when SVE state is volatile across SVC:
-//	mov	x8, #__NR_sched_yield	// Encourage preemption
-//	svc	#0
-
 #ifdef SSVE
 	mrs	x0, S3_3_C4_C2_2	// SVCR should have ZA=0,SM=1
 	and	x1, x0, #3
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/za-test.S b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/za-test.S
index a0165a81a937..8d449e114301 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/za-test.S
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/za-test.S
@@ -10,7 +10,6 @@
 // (leave it running for as long as you want...)
 // kill $pids
 
-#include <asm/unistd.h>
 #include "assembler.h"
 #include "asm-offsets.h"
 #include "sme-inst.h"
@@ -203,10 +202,6 @@ function main
 	subs	x21, x21, #1
 	b.ne	0b
 
-	mov	x8, #__NR_sched_yield	// encourage preemption
-1:
-	svc	#0
-
 	mrs	x0, S3_3_C4_C2_2	// SVCR should have ZA=1,SM=0
 	and	x1, x0, #3
 	cmp	x1, #2
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/zt-test.S b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/zt-test.S
index 1c7db1298fb1..2333e72760a5 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/zt-test.S
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/fp/zt-test.S
@@ -6,7 +6,6 @@
 // Repeatedly writes unique test patterns into ZT0
 // and reads them back to verify integrity.
 
-#include <asm/unistd.h>
 #include "assembler.h"
 #include "asm-offsets.h"
 #include "sme-inst.h"
@@ -143,9 +142,6 @@ function main
 	mov	x1, x22
 	bl	setup_zt
 
-	mov	x8, #__NR_sched_yield	// Encourage preemption
-	svc	#0
-
 	mrs	x0, S3_3_C4_C2_2	// SVCR should have ZA=1,SM=0
 	and	x1, x0, #3
 	cmp	x1, #2

-- 
2.47.3



  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-09-01 17:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-09-01 17:06 [PATCH 00/11] kselftest/arm64: Add coverage of interactions with KVM to fp-stress Mark Brown
2026-09-01 17:06 ` [PATCH 01/11] kselftest/arm64: Factor Linux syscalls out of asm-utils.S Mark Brown
2026-09-01 17:06 ` [PATCH 02/11] kselftest/arm64: Factor shared signal handlers out of fp-stress loads Mark Brown
2026-09-01 17:06 ` [PATCH 03/11] kselftest/arm64: Move exit calls " Mark Brown
2026-09-01 17:06 ` [PATCH 04/11] kselftest/arm64: Use exit_error() rather than SIGABRT in fp-stress Mark Brown
2026-09-01 17:06 ` [PATCH 05/11] kselftest/arm64: Exit with an error code on data mismatches " Mark Brown
2026-09-01 17:06 ` [PATCH 06/11] kselftest/arm64: Factor startup code out of fp-stress load programs Mark Brown
2026-09-01 17:06 ` Mark Brown [this message]
2026-09-01 17:06 ` [PATCH 08/11] kselftest/arm64: Add a very simple VMM for use in fp-stress Mark Brown
2026-09-01 17:06 ` [PATCH 09/11] kselftest/arm64: Build KVM guest versions of the fp-stress loads Mark Brown
2026-09-01 17:06 ` [PATCH 10/11] kselftest/arm64: Use execv() to start fp-stress test loads Mark Brown
2026-09-01 17:06 ` [PATCH 11/11] kselftest/arm64: Run KVM guests from fp-stress Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260901-arm64-fp-stress-kvm-v1-7-31bce995b49b@kernel.org \
    --to=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=fuad.tabba@linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=oupton@kernel.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox