Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@oss.qualcomm.com>
To: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@kernel.org>
Cc: arm-scmi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	kernel-team@meta.com, Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>,
	Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 9/9] firmware: arm_scmi: Validate PCC shared memory signature
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2026 16:31:10 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260902163110.000054cc@oss.qualcomm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260902-miniature-bullfinch-of-agreement-4e15fd@sudeepholla>

On Wed, 2 Sep 2026 09:25:19 +0100
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@kernel.org> wrote:

> On Mon, Aug 24, 2026 at 01:24:50PM -0700, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> > On Thu, 13 Aug 2026 12:33:04 +0100
> > Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@kernel.org> wrote:
> >   
> > > Validate the PCC shared memory signature when setting up an SCMI PCC
> > > channel.
> > > 
> > > Reject channels whose shared memory signature does not encode
> > > PCC_SIGNATURE combined with the PCC subspace ID, so misconfigured
> > > firmware is caught before the transport starts using the shared memory
> > > region.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@kernel.org>  
> > Interesting there aren't more checks on this in the various PCC users.
> > Question for another day perhaps.
> >   
> 
> Tried cleaning up all but some platforms like Hisilicon kunpeng complained
> it will break their platforms. So added a warning in the core but I want
> to enforce stricter check here for SCMI PCC.

Fair enough.  I'd be tempted to check in core and add a quirks list
for those broken platforms but meh, not my problem ;)


> 
> > Seems correct to me.
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@oss.qualcomm.com>
> >   
> 
> Thanks!
> 



  reply	other threads:[~2026-09-02 23:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-08-13 11:32 [PATCH v3 0/9] firmware: arm_scmi: Refactoring and enablement of ACPI PCC transport Sudeep Holla
2026-08-13 11:32 ` [PATCH v3 1/9] firmware: arm_scmi: Set fwnode for the generated SCMI platform device Sudeep Holla
2026-08-24 16:51   ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-02  7:51     ` Sudeep Holla
2026-09-02 23:26       ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-03  9:16         ` Bartosz Golaszewski
2026-08-13 11:32 ` [PATCH v3 2/9] firmware: arm_scmi: Extend transport driver macro to support ACPI Sudeep Holla
2026-08-24 17:04   ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-02  7:53     ` Sudeep Holla
2026-08-13 11:32 ` [PATCH v3 3/9] firmware: arm_scmi: Convert OF-only paths to generic fwnode in SCMI core Sudeep Holla
2026-08-24 17:39   ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-02 13:39     ` Sudeep Holla
2026-09-02 23:29       ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-03  6:36         ` Sudeep Holla
2026-08-13 11:32 ` [PATCH v3 4/9] firmware: arm_scmi: Fall back to ACPI HID when "compatible" is absent Sudeep Holla
2026-08-24 17:43   ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-02  8:03     ` Sudeep Holla
2026-09-02  8:09       ` Sudeep Holla
2026-08-13 11:33 ` [PATCH v3 5/9] firmware: arm_scmi: Pass protocol ID to chan_available() transport callback Sudeep Holla
2026-08-24 17:45   ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-08-13 11:33 ` [PATCH v3 6/9] firmware: arm_scmi: Refactor protocol device creation logic Sudeep Holla
2026-08-24 17:49   ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-02 13:52     ` Sudeep Holla
2026-08-13 11:33 ` [PATCH v3 7/9] firmware: arm_scmi: Add ACPI PCC transport Sudeep Holla
2026-08-24 20:17   ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-03 13:43     ` Sudeep Holla
2026-08-13 11:33 ` [PATCH v3 8/9] firmware: arm_scmi: Initialise known ACPI protocol devices and channels Sudeep Holla
2026-08-24 20:21   ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-08-13 11:33 ` [PATCH v3 9/9] firmware: arm_scmi: Validate PCC shared memory signature Sudeep Holla
2026-08-24 20:24   ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-09-02  8:25     ` Sudeep Holla
2026-09-02 23:31       ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2026-09-03  6:39         ` Sudeep Holla

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260902163110.000054cc@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --to=jonathan.cameron@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=arm-scmi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=cristian.marussi@arm.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=leitao@debian.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox