From: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
To: lee@kernel.org, "Uwe Kleine-König" <ukleinek@kernel.org>,
"Frank Li" <Frank.Li@nxp.com>,
"Sascha Hauer" <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
"Pengutronix Kernel Team" <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
"Fabio Estevam" <festevam@gmail.com>,
"Shawn Guo" <shawn.guo@linaro.org>,
"Thierry Reding" <thierry.reding@gmail.com>,
"Rasmus Villemoes" <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>,
linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/8] pwm: mxs: Return early when disabling and fix error-path clock leak
Date: Thu, 5 Nov 2026 14:38:04 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20261105143847.2559586-3-lee@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261105143847.2559586-1-lee@kernel.org>
When disabling a PWM channel (!state->enabled), the PWM core permits
state->period to be zero. mxs_pwm_apply() currently falls through into
the period and duty-cycle calculations even when !state->enabled,
causing do_div(c, state->period) to divide by zero when state->period is
zero. In addition, if the requested period exceeds the maximum divider
(div >= PERIOD_CDIV_MAX) while the PWM channel is currently disabled,
mxs_pwm_apply() returns -EINVAL without disabling and unpreparing
mxs->clk.
Handle the !state->enabled path upfront and return early, and balance
clk_prepare_enable() on the -EINVAL error path.
Fixes: bf29c2ff82fd ("pwm: mxs: Implement ->apply()")
Closes: https://sashiko.dev/#/bug/linux-710f863f-6964-4e4f-990a-e5043dbc1a87
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
---
drivers/pwm/pwm-mxs.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++--------------
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-mxs.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-mxs.c
index e1a3df6549fc..16233764fd3c 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-mxs.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-mxs.c
@@ -56,6 +56,14 @@ static int mxs_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
unsigned long long c;
unsigned int pol_bits;
+ if (!state->enabled) {
+ if (pwm_is_enabled(pwm)) {
+ writel(1 << pwm->hwpwm, mxs->base + PWM_CTRL + CLR);
+ clk_disable_unprepare(mxs->clk);
+ }
+ return 0;
+ }
+
/*
* If the PWM channel is disabled, make sure to turn on the
* clock before calling clk_get_rate() and writing to the
@@ -67,9 +75,6 @@ static int mxs_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
return ret;
}
- if (!state->enabled && pwm_is_enabled(pwm))
- writel(1 << pwm->hwpwm, mxs->base + PWM_CTRL + CLR);
-
rate = clk_get_rate(mxs->clk);
while (1) {
c = rate >> cdiv_shift[div];
@@ -78,8 +83,11 @@ static int mxs_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
if (c < PERIOD_PERIOD_MAX)
break;
div++;
- if (div >= PERIOD_CDIV_MAX)
+ if (div >= PERIOD_CDIV_MAX) {
+ if (!pwm_is_enabled(pwm))
+ clk_disable_unprepare(mxs->clk);
return -EINVAL;
+ }
}
period_cycles = c;
@@ -101,16 +109,12 @@ static int mxs_pwm_apply(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
writel(PERIOD_PERIOD(period_cycles) | pol_bits | PERIOD_CDIV(div),
mxs->base + PWM_PERIOD0 + pwm->hwpwm * 0x20);
- if (state->enabled) {
- if (!pwm_is_enabled(pwm)) {
- /*
- * The clock was enabled above. Just enable
- * the channel in the control register.
- */
- writel(1 << pwm->hwpwm, mxs->base + PWM_CTRL + SET);
- }
- } else {
- clk_disable_unprepare(mxs->clk);
+ if (!pwm_is_enabled(pwm)) {
+ /*
+ * The clock was enabled above. Just enable
+ * the channel in the control register.
+ */
+ writel(1 << pwm->hwpwm, mxs->base + PWM_CTRL + SET);
}
return 0;
}
Cc: Rasmus Villemoes <linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk>
--
2.56.0.398.g882cbad275-goog
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-05 14:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-05 14:38 [PATCH 0/8] pwm: Fix various bugs reported by Sashiko Lee Jones
2026-11-05 14:38 ` Lee Jones [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20261105143847.2559586-3-lee@kernel.org \
--to=lee@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@nxp.com \
--cc=festevam@gmail.com \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@rasmusvillemoes.dk \
--cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=shawn.guo@linaro.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=thierry.reding@gmail.com \
--cc=ukleinek@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox