[PATCH] ARM: fix kmemleak for XIP_KERNEL

[PATCH] ARM: fix kmemleak for XIP_KERNEL

[Arnd Bergmann]

The newly added check for RO_AFTER_INIT_DATA in kmemleak breaks ARM whenever
XIP_KERNEL is enabled:

mm/kmemleak.o: In function `kmemleak_scan':
kmemleak.c:(.text.kmemleak_scan+0x2e4): undefined reference to `__end_data_ro_after_init'
kmemleak.c:(.text.kmemleak_scan+0x2e8): undefined reference to `__start_data_ro_after_init'

This adds the start/end symbols for the section even in the case of having
no data in the section, to make the check work while keeping the architecture
specific override in one place.

Fixes: d7c19b066dcf ("mm: kmemleak: scan .data.ro_after_init")
Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
---
The patch causing this was merged late into v4.9-rc, this one should
probably go there as well.

I assume the same problem exists on s390, but I have not checked that.
---
 arch/arm/kernel/vmlinux-xip.lds.S | 7 +++++--
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/vmlinux-xip.lds.S b/arch/arm/kernel/vmlinux-xip.lds.S
index 06c178214629..bf900f5421a1 100644
--- a/arch/arm/kernel/vmlinux-xip.lds.S
+++ b/arch/arm/kernel/vmlinux-xip.lds.S
@@ -3,8 +3,11 @@
  * Written by Martin Mares <mj@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
  */
 
-/* No __ro_after_init data in the .rodata section - which will always be ro */
-#define RO_AFTER_INIT_DATA
+/* empty __ro_after_init data in the .rodata section - it will always be ro */
+#define RO_AFTER_INIT_DATA						\
+	__start_data_ro_after_init = .;                                 \
+	__end_data_ro_after_init = .;
+
 
 #include <asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h>
 #include <asm/cache.h>
-- 
2.9.0

[PATCH] ARM: fix kmemleak for XIP_KERNEL

[Kees Cook]

On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 6:28 AM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> The newly added check for RO_AFTER_INIT_DATA in kmemleak breaks ARM whenever
> XIP_KERNEL is enabled:
>
> mm/kmemleak.o: In function `kmemleak_scan':
> kmemleak.c:(.text.kmemleak_scan+0x2e4): undefined reference to `__end_data_ro_after_init'
> kmemleak.c:(.text.kmemleak_scan+0x2e8): undefined reference to `__start_data_ro_after_init'
>
> This adds the start/end symbols for the section even in the case of having
> no data in the section, to make the check work while keeping the architecture
> specific override in one place.
>
> Fixes: d7c19b066dcf ("mm: kmemleak: scan .data.ro_after_init")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>

Acked-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>

-Kees

> ---
> The patch causing this was merged late into v4.9-rc, this one should
> probably go there as well.
>
> I assume the same problem exists on s390, but I have not checked that.
> ---
>  arch/arm/kernel/vmlinux-xip.lds.S | 7 +++++--
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/kernel/vmlinux-xip.lds.S b/arch/arm/kernel/vmlinux-xip.lds.S
> index 06c178214629..bf900f5421a1 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/kernel/vmlinux-xip.lds.S
> +++ b/arch/arm/kernel/vmlinux-xip.lds.S
> @@ -3,8 +3,11 @@
>   * Written by Martin Mares <mj@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>
>   */
>
> -/* No __ro_after_init data in the .rodata section - which will always be ro */
> -#define RO_AFTER_INIT_DATA
> +/* empty __ro_after_init data in the .rodata section - it will always be ro */
> +#define RO_AFTER_INIT_DATA                                             \
> +       __start_data_ro_after_init = .;                                 \
> +       __end_data_ro_after_init = .;
> +
>
>  #include <asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h>
>  #include <asm/cache.h>
> --
> 2.9.0
>



-- 
Kees Cook
Nexus Security

[PATCH] ARM: fix kmemleak for XIP_KERNEL

[Jakub Kicinski]

On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 6:28 AM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> The newly added check for RO_AFTER_INIT_DATA in kmemleak breaks ARM whenever
> XIP_KERNEL is enabled:
>
> mm/kmemleak.o: In function `kmemleak_scan':
> kmemleak.c:(.text.kmemleak_scan+0x2e4): undefined reference to `__end_data_ro_after_init'
> kmemleak.c:(.text.kmemleak_scan+0x2e8): undefined reference to `__start_data_ro_after_init'
>
> This adds the start/end symbols for the section even in the case of having
> no data in the section, to make the check work while keeping the architecture
> specific override in one place.
>
> Fixes: d7c19b066dcf ("mm: kmemleak: scan .data.ro_after_init")
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> ---
> The patch causing this was merged late into v4.9-rc, this one should
> probably go there as well.
>
> I assume the same problem exists on s390, but I have not checked that.

Hi Arnd!

Sorry for breaking things again :( The confusion must have been caused
by going via different trees.  Actually, Russell's commit is dated 6
days after mine so could as well be:

Fixes: 2a3811068fbc ("ARM: Fix XIP kernels")

Not that it matters.

About s390 - I thought I took care of it in d7c19b066dcf ("mm:
kmemleak: scan .data.ro_after_init"), do you see anything suspicious
in the way I did it?  I'll do some more s390 builds just to triple
check.

Sorry again,
Kuba

[PATCH] ARM: fix kmemleak for XIP_KERNEL

[Arnd Bergmann]

On Thursday, November 24, 2016 1:30:03 AM CET Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 22, 2016 at 6:28 AM, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> wrote:
> > The newly added check for RO_AFTER_INIT_DATA in kmemleak breaks ARM whenever
> > XIP_KERNEL is enabled:
> >
> > mm/kmemleak.o: In function `kmemleak_scan':
> > kmemleak.c:(.text.kmemleak_scan+0x2e4): undefined reference to `__end_data_ro_after_init'
> > kmemleak.c:(.text.kmemleak_scan+0x2e8): undefined reference to `__start_data_ro_after_init'
> >
> > This adds the start/end symbols for the section even in the case of having
> > no data in the section, to make the check work while keeping the architecture
> > specific override in one place.
> >
> > Fixes: d7c19b066dcf ("mm: kmemleak: scan .data.ro_after_init")
> > Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
> > ---
> > The patch causing this was merged late into v4.9-rc, this one should
> > probably go there as well.
> >
> > I assume the same problem exists on s390, but I have not checked that.
> 
> Hi Arnd!
> 
> Sorry for breaking things again :( The confusion must have been caused
> by going via different trees.  Actually, Russell's commit is dated 6
> days after mine so could as well be:
> 
> Fixes: 2a3811068fbc ("ARM: Fix XIP kernels")
> 
> Not that it matters.

Got it. I guess it's really the combination of the two, so I'd clarify
that in the changelog and list both commits.
 
> About s390 - I thought I took care of it in d7c19b066dcf ("mm:
> kmemleak: scan .data.ro_after_init"), do you see anything suspicious
> in the way I did it?  I'll do some more s390 builds just to triple
> check.

You are right, I had already noticed that too but not replied yet.
s390 is ok as far as I can tell.

	Arnd