Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hector Martin <marcan@marcan.st>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
	peterz@infradead.org, jirislaby@kernel.org, maz@kernel.org,
	mark.rutland@arm.com, boqun.feng@gmail.com,
	catalin.marinas@arm.com, oneukum@suse.com,
	roman.penyaev@profitbricks.com, asahi@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] workqueue: Fix memory ordering race in queue_work*()
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2022 15:28:50 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <24c88c4f-aea5-1fb7-0ead-95c88629d72b@marcan.st> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wjfLT7nL8pV8RWATpjgm0zDtUwT8UMtroqnGcXRjN8tgw@mail.gmail.com>

On 2022/08/16 14:52, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> I think I understand *why* it's broken - it looks like a "harmless"
> optimization. After all, if the bitop doesn't do anything, there's
> nothing to order it with.
> 
> It makes a certain amount of sense - as long as you don't think about
> it too hard.
> 
> The reason it is completely and utterly broken is that it's not
> actually just "the bitop doesn't do anything". Even when it doesn't
> change the bit value, just the ordering of the read of the old bit
> value can be meaningful, exactly for that case of "I added more work
> to the queue, I need to set the bit to tell the consumers, and if I'm
> the first person to set the bit I may need to wake the consumer up".

This is the same reason I argued queue_work() itself needs to have a
similar guarantee, even when it doesn't queue work (and I updated the
doc to match). If test_and_set_bit() is used in this kind of context
often in the kernel, clearly the current implementation/doc clashes with
that.

As I said, I don't have any particular beef in this fight, but this is
horribly broken on M1/2 right now, so I'll send a patch to change the
bitops instead and you all can fight it out over which way is correct :)

-- 
Hector Martin (marcan@marcan.st)
Public Key: https://mrcn.st/pub

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  reply	other threads:[~2022-08-16  6:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-15 17:58 [PATCH] workqueue: Fix memory ordering race in queue_work*() Hector Martin
2022-08-15 19:10 ` Tejun Heo
2022-08-16  4:15   ` Herbert Xu
2022-08-16  5:27     ` Linus Torvalds
2022-08-16  5:36       ` Hector Martin
2022-08-16  5:52         ` Linus Torvalds
2022-08-16  6:28           ` Hector Martin [this message]
2022-08-16  7:48             ` Herbert Xu
2022-08-16  8:01               ` Hector Martin
2022-08-16  5:48       ` Herbert Xu
2022-08-16  6:03         ` Linus Torvalds
2022-08-16 13:41       ` Will Deacon
2022-08-16 14:55         ` Boqun Feng
2022-08-16 16:22           ` Hector Martin
2022-08-16 16:43             ` Boqun Feng
2022-08-16 16:58             ` Linus Torvalds
2022-08-16 16:41         ` Linus Torvalds
2022-08-17  5:05           ` Herbert Xu
2022-08-16 17:01         ` Tejun Heo
2022-08-16 16:26     ` Tejun Heo
2022-08-16 17:21       ` Hector Martin
2022-08-16  4:14 ` Herbert Xu
2022-08-16  5:37   ` Hector Martin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=24c88c4f-aea5-1fb7-0ead-95c88629d72b@marcan.st \
    --to=marcan@marcan.st \
    --cc=asahi@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=herbert@gondor.apana.org.au \
    --cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=oneukum@suse.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=roman.penyaev@profitbricks.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox