Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
To: Pranjal Shrivastava <praan@google.com>,
	iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
	Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
	Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>,
	David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
	Samiullah Khawaja <skhawaja@google.com>,
	Daniel Mentz <danielmentz@google.com>,
	Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
	Mostafa Saleh <smostafa@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/7] PCI/ATS: Decouple pci_ats_supported() from pci_prepare_ats()
Date: Fri, 29 May 2026 14:29:16 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2693467a-eb86-4cb9-9161-db6042b0335d@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260528202353.3422206-4-praan@google.com>

On 5/29/26 04:23, Pranjal Shrivastava wrote:
> Currently, pci_prepare_ats() internally calls pci_ats_supported() and
> returns -EINVAL if the device does not support ATS. While this provides
> a safety check, it conflates support detection with configuration.
> 
> Update pci_prepare_ats() to remove the internal support check. This
> decouples support verification from the configuration phase, ensuring
> that drivers can distinguish between a device that does not support ATS
> and one that has a true configuration error (e.g. STU mismatch).
> 
> Update the function documentation to mandate that callers must verify
> ATS support (via pci_ats_supported()) before calling pci_prepare_ats().
> 
> Signed-off-by: Pranjal Shrivastava <praan@google.com>
> ---
>   drivers/pci/ats.c | 7 +++----
>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/ats.c b/drivers/pci/ats.c
> index 8057c24b0469..92c2a6bc2dcc 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/ats.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/ats.c
> @@ -56,7 +56,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_ats_supported);
>    * @ps: the IOMMU page shift
>    *
>    * This must be done by the IOMMU driver on the PF before any VFs are created to
> - * ensure that the VF can have ATS enabled.
> + * ensure that the VF can have ATS enabled. Callers must verify that ATS is
> + * supported by the device (e.g. via pci_ats_supported()) before calling this
> + * function.
>    *
>    * Returns 0 on success, or negative on failure.
>    */
> @@ -64,9 +66,6 @@ int pci_prepare_ats(struct pci_dev *dev, int ps)
>   {
>   	u16 ctrl;
>   
> -	if (!pci_ats_supported(dev))
> -		return -EINVAL;
> -
>   	if (WARN_ON(dev->ats_enabled))
>   		return -EBUSY;
>   

I am not sure that the removal above ensures that 'drivers can
distinguish between a device that does not support ATS and one that has
a true configuration error (e.g., STU mismatch)', especially considering
that this helper already has a return value that explicitly conveys the
failure reason.

Furthermore, if a caller misuses this API by calling it against a non-
ATS device, the following code executes:

         ctrl = PCI_ATS_CTRL_STU(dev->ats_stu - PCI_ATS_MIN_STU);
         pci_write_config_word(dev, dev->ats_cap + PCI_ATS_CTRL, ctrl);

This causes the driver to attempt a write to an invalid or non-existent
PCI configuration space address. Instead of removing the check from the
function entirely, how about adding a WARN_ON() around it?

	if (WARN_ON(!pci_ats_supported(dev)))
		return -EINVAL;

Thanks,
baolu


  reply	other threads:[~2026-05-29  6:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-28 20:23 [PATCH v5 0/7] iommu: Standardize ATS robustness and state tracking Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-05-28 20:23 ` [PATCH v5 1/7] PCI/ATS: Ensure pci_ats_supported() is PF-aware for VFs Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-05-29  6:02   ` Baolu Lu
2026-05-28 20:23 ` [PATCH v5 2/7] PCI/ATS: Validate STU for VFs in pci_prepare_ats() Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-05-29  6:05   ` Baolu Lu
2026-05-28 20:23 ` [PATCH v5 3/7] PCI/ATS: Decouple pci_ats_supported() from pci_prepare_ats() Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-05-29  6:29   ` Baolu Lu [this message]
2026-05-29  7:08     ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-05-28 20:23 ` [PATCH v5 4/7] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Standardize ATS enablement failure reporting Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-05-28 20:23 ` [PATCH v5 5/7] iommu/vt-d: Fix RB-tree corruption and Use-After-Free in probe Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-05-29  3:20   ` Baolu Lu
2026-05-29  7:04     ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-05-28 20:23 ` [PATCH v5 6/7] iommu/vt-d: Fail probe on ATS configuration failure Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-05-29  6:39   ` Baolu Lu
2026-05-29  7:03     ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-05-28 20:23 ` [PATCH v5 7/7] iommu/amd: " Pranjal Shrivastava

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2693467a-eb86-4cb9-9161-db6042b0335d@linux.intel.com \
    --to=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=danielmentz@google.com \
    --cc=dmatlack@google.com \
    --cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
    --cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
    --cc=praan@google.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=skhawaja@google.com \
    --cc=smostafa@google.com \
    --cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox