From: Pranjal Shrivastava <praan@google.com>
To: Baolu Lu <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Cc: iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>,
David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com>,
Samiullah Khawaja <skhawaja@google.com>,
Daniel Mentz <danielmentz@google.com>,
Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>,
Mostafa Saleh <smostafa@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/7] PCI/ATS: Decouple pci_ats_supported() from pci_prepare_ats()
Date: Fri, 29 May 2026 07:08:42 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ahk7eomIcbZTkEAu@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2693467a-eb86-4cb9-9161-db6042b0335d@linux.intel.com>
On Fri, May 29, 2026 at 02:29:16PM +0800, Baolu Lu wrote:
> On 5/29/26 04:23, Pranjal Shrivastava wrote:
> > Currently, pci_prepare_ats() internally calls pci_ats_supported() and
> > returns -EINVAL if the device does not support ATS. While this provides
> > a safety check, it conflates support detection with configuration.
> >
> > Update pci_prepare_ats() to remove the internal support check. This
> > decouples support verification from the configuration phase, ensuring
> > that drivers can distinguish between a device that does not support ATS
> > and one that has a true configuration error (e.g. STU mismatch).
> >
> > Update the function documentation to mandate that callers must verify
> > ATS support (via pci_ats_supported()) before calling pci_prepare_ats().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Pranjal Shrivastava <praan@google.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/pci/ats.c | 7 +++----
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/ats.c b/drivers/pci/ats.c
> > index 8057c24b0469..92c2a6bc2dcc 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/ats.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/ats.c
> > @@ -56,7 +56,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_ats_supported);
> > * @ps: the IOMMU page shift
> > *
> > * This must be done by the IOMMU driver on the PF before any VFs are created to
> > - * ensure that the VF can have ATS enabled.
> > + * ensure that the VF can have ATS enabled. Callers must verify that ATS is
> > + * supported by the device (e.g. via pci_ats_supported()) before calling this
> > + * function.
> > *
> > * Returns 0 on success, or negative on failure.
> > */
> > @@ -64,9 +66,6 @@ int pci_prepare_ats(struct pci_dev *dev, int ps)
> > {
> > u16 ctrl;
> > - if (!pci_ats_supported(dev))
> > - return -EINVAL;
> > -
> > if (WARN_ON(dev->ats_enabled))
> > return -EBUSY;
>
> I am not sure that the removal above ensures that 'drivers can
> distinguish between a device that does not support ATS and one that has
> a true configuration error (e.g., STU mismatch)', especially considering
> that this helper already has a return value that explicitly conveys the
> failure reason.
>
> Furthermore, if a caller misuses this API by calling it against a non-
> ATS device,
Ack. The idea was that all callers will check pci_ats_supported() before
calling pci_prepare_ats() but I guess I didn't consider callers abusing
this for non-ATS cases.
>
> ctrl = PCI_ATS_CTRL_STU(dev->ats_stu - PCI_ATS_MIN_STU);
> pci_write_config_word(dev, dev->ats_cap + PCI_ATS_CTRL, ctrl);
>
> This causes the driver to attempt a write to an invalid or non-existent
> PCI configuration space address. Instead of removing the check from the
> function entirely, how about adding a WARN_ON() around it?
>
> if (WARN_ON(!pci_ats_supported(dev)))
> return -EINVAL;
Ack. That makes sense. I'll post another version!
Thanks,
Praan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-29 7:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-28 20:23 [PATCH v5 0/7] iommu: Standardize ATS robustness and state tracking Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-05-28 20:23 ` [PATCH v5 1/7] PCI/ATS: Ensure pci_ats_supported() is PF-aware for VFs Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-05-29 6:02 ` Baolu Lu
2026-05-28 20:23 ` [PATCH v5 2/7] PCI/ATS: Validate STU for VFs in pci_prepare_ats() Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-05-29 6:05 ` Baolu Lu
2026-05-28 20:23 ` [PATCH v5 3/7] PCI/ATS: Decouple pci_ats_supported() from pci_prepare_ats() Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-05-29 6:29 ` Baolu Lu
2026-05-29 7:08 ` Pranjal Shrivastava [this message]
2026-05-28 20:23 ` [PATCH v5 4/7] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Standardize ATS enablement failure reporting Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-05-28 20:23 ` [PATCH v5 5/7] iommu/vt-d: Fix RB-tree corruption and Use-After-Free in probe Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-05-29 3:20 ` Baolu Lu
2026-05-29 7:04 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-05-28 20:23 ` [PATCH v5 6/7] iommu/vt-d: Fail probe on ATS configuration failure Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-05-29 6:39 ` Baolu Lu
2026-05-29 7:03 ` Pranjal Shrivastava
2026-05-28 20:23 ` [PATCH v5 7/7] iommu/amd: " Pranjal Shrivastava
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ahk7eomIcbZTkEAu@google.com \
--to=praan@google.com \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=danielmentz@google.com \
--cc=dmatlack@google.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=skhawaja@google.com \
--cc=smostafa@google.com \
--cc=suravee.suthikulpanit@amd.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox