From: tomasz.figa@gmail.com (Tomasz Figa)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: EXYNOS: Support Suspend-to-RAM on EXYNOS5420
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 22:19:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <346894265.CPBN0v9Elj@flatron> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANruHrS1D8d_y43xa-2OGduTvAGWfdeY1REVzZ6YJHjhzLg+hw@mail.gmail.com>
Hi,
On Friday 20 of December 2013 15:56:38 sunil joshi wrote:
> Hi Abhilash,
> I saw another patch in chrome tree ..by Andrew Bresticker
> which may be relevant here ..
>
> Just wondering if you missed adding this ? or this is not needed ?
> You did not face any issue in getting core to suspend ?
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> commit 95402d816b9f1a05ce633f7ff64b4c939c142482
> Author: Andrew Bresticker <abrestic@chromium.org>
> Date: Mon Jul 15 13:14:36 2013 -0700
>
> arm: exynos: disable all interrupts on Exynos5420 before suspend
>
> Disable all interrupts from the GIC before entering suspend on
> Exynos5420 as is done on Exynos5250. If interrupts are enabled, we
> may receive an interrupt after entering WFI but before the PMU has
> suspended the system, causing suspend to fail.
>
> BUG=chrome-os-partner:20523
> TEST=Run suspend_stress_test on Pit and observe that entering suspend
> no longer occasionally fails with the "Failed to suspend the system"
> error in exynos_cpu_suspend().
A question about this for Chromium and LSI guys:
If you find out that there is already a pending interrupt before you enter
the sleep mode, isn't it more reasonable to cancel the process ASAP and
handle the event instead of entering the sleep just to leave it?
I believe this should be both more efficient with respect to power usage
and latency, because sleep-wakeup transition takes time and power.
Do you have any reason to think the opposite?
Best regards,
Tomasz
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-20 21:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-16 12:01 [PATCH 1/2] ARM: EXYNOS: Support Suspend-to-RAM on EXYNOS5420 Abhilash Kesavan
2013-12-16 12:01 ` [PATCH 2/2] ARM: dts: Add node for GPIO keys on SMDK5420 Abhilash Kesavan
2013-12-16 12:48 ` [PATCH 1/2] ARM: EXYNOS: Support Suspend-to-RAM on EXYNOS5420 Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
2013-12-17 3:10 ` Abhilash Kesavan
2013-12-20 10:26 ` sunil joshi
2013-12-20 11:38 ` Abhilash Kesavan
2013-12-20 11:53 ` sunil joshi
2013-12-20 21:22 ` Olof Johansson
2013-12-20 21:23 ` Tomasz Figa
2013-12-20 21:25 ` Olof Johansson
2013-12-20 21:25 ` Tomasz Figa
2013-12-21 7:06 ` Abhilash Kesavan
2013-12-20 21:19 ` Tomasz Figa [this message]
2013-12-20 21:37 ` Olof Johansson
2013-12-20 21:53 ` Tomasz Figa
2013-12-21 7:40 ` Abhilash Kesavan
2013-12-21 1:15 ` Doug Anderson
[not found] ` <CAPQV+nO=Xe=z669QxCJSerrm-xP0b=WtyPveyh2uTcM2B3i5KQ@mail.gmail.com>
2014-01-18 2:44 ` Abhilash Kesavan
2013-12-16 13:27 ` Vaibhav Bedia
2013-12-16 16:15 ` Tomasz Figa
2013-12-20 21:37 ` Tomasz Figa
2013-12-21 7:18 ` Abhilash Kesavan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=346894265.CPBN0v9Elj@flatron \
--to=tomasz.figa@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox