From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 00/11] ARM: at91: remove !DT support for at91rm9200
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2014 17:49:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3550407.q87bWB4Jdt@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1417103399.git.nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
On Thursday 27 November 2014 17:06:28 Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> This is the last series of patches that removes the non-Device-Tree board
> support for older Atmel SoCs.
> Again, for the record, it was announced here
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/9/10/293 ([ANNOUNCE] ARM: at91: removal of board
> files) two months ago.
> Several files beyond at91rm9200 are touched this time as I tried to remove the
> biggest parts that were related to !DT SoC initializations. More cleanup is
> certainly needed to remove dead code.
>
> The diffstat is also pretty big as a lot of at91rm9200 boards were remaining.
>
Awesome stuff!
Two questions:
- is anything holding this up from getting merged in 3.19?
- Are there any remaining issues that keep us from using multiplatform?
I know you all have been working on those a lot, but I haven't
checked what is still missing.
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-27 16:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-27 16:06 [PATCH 00/11] ARM: at91: remove !DT support for at91rm9200 Nicolas Ferre
2014-11-27 16:06 ` [PATCH 01/11] ARM: at91: remove at91rm9200 legacy boards files Nicolas Ferre
2014-11-27 16:06 ` [PATCH 02/11] ARM: at91: remove at91rm9200 legacy board support Nicolas Ferre
2014-11-27 16:06 ` [PATCH 03/11] ARM: at91: switch configuration option to SOC_AT91RM9200 Nicolas Ferre
2014-11-27 16:06 ` [PATCH 04/11] ARM: at91/Kconfig: remove ARCH_AT91RM9200 option for drivers Nicolas Ferre
2014-11-27 16:06 ` [PATCH 05/11] ARM: at91: always USE_OF from now on Nicolas Ferre
2014-11-27 16:06 ` [PATCH 06/11] ARM: at91/trivial: update Kconfig comment to mention SAMA5 Nicolas Ferre
2014-11-27 16:06 ` [PATCH 07/11] ARM: at91: remove all !DT related configuration options Nicolas Ferre
2014-11-27 16:06 ` [PATCH 08/11] ARM: at91: remove clock data in at91sam9n12.c and at91sam9x5.c files Nicolas Ferre
2014-11-27 16:06 ` [PATCH 09/11] ARM: at91: remove old at91-specific clock driver Nicolas Ferre
2014-11-27 16:06 ` [PATCH 10/11] ARM: at91: remove legacy IRQ driver and related code Nicolas Ferre
2014-11-27 16:20 ` Julia Lawall
2014-11-27 16:06 ` [PATCH 11/11] ARM: at91: remove unused IRQ function declarations Nicolas Ferre
2014-11-27 16:49 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2014-11-27 17:12 ` [PATCH 00/11] ARM: at91: remove !DT support for at91rm9200 Alexandre Belloni
2014-11-27 17:38 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-11-28 9:36 ` Nicolas Ferre
2014-11-28 10:25 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-11-28 10:48 ` Nicolas Ferre
2014-11-27 23:12 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-11-27 23:39 ` Boris Brezillon
2014-11-27 23:41 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-11-28 0:28 ` Alexandre Belloni
2014-11-28 8:27 ` Alexander Stein
2014-11-28 8:49 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-11-28 11:31 ` Alexandre Belloni
2014-11-28 12:06 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-11-28 11:13 ` Boris Brezillon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3550407.q87bWB4Jdt@wuerfel \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox