From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 00/11] ARM: at91: remove !DT support for at91rm9200
Date: Fri, 28 Nov 2014 13:06:40 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <25050514.vKmbVUQfkQ@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20141128113111.GO4508@piout.net>
On Friday 28 November 2014 12:31:12 Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> On 28/11/2014 at 09:49:10 +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote :
> > > > Actually, some work was done but we never saw an other version of the
> > > > series. Alexander, are you still interested? Else we can take the patch
> > > > below.
> > > >
> > > > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-April/246679.html
> >
> > I see. Yes, the approach is similar, and there are actually multiple
> > independent problems:
> >
> > - getting the current driver to build with multiplatform (trivial, 5 lines)
> > - changing the gpio handling to work with DT (simple, both of us did that)
> > - writing the binding (simple)
>
> Yeah, let's focus on those first steps. Takashi was willing to take
> patches, even if we were not converting the driver to ASoC.
>
> > - changing the driver to ASoC (not that simple)
> >
> > > Well, I tried to get a ac97c driver based on alsa soc framework as suggested
> > > by Takashi. But I failed so far, I could not get my head around those
> > > architecture.
> >
> > Let's just start with the trivial first patch, that can probably just be merged
> > into 3.19, and then we can build on top of that later if anybody wants to
> > get ac97 working again on at91.
> >
>
> Do you want one of us to send that patch to Takashi and the Alsa ML or
> will you do it?
> You can add my ack.
Please send it after you have checked that it actually works, I only
took a snippet from my earlier patch assuming it would be sufficient,
but I didn't try.
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-28 12:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-27 16:06 [PATCH 00/11] ARM: at91: remove !DT support for at91rm9200 Nicolas Ferre
2014-11-27 16:06 ` [PATCH 01/11] ARM: at91: remove at91rm9200 legacy boards files Nicolas Ferre
2014-11-27 16:06 ` [PATCH 02/11] ARM: at91: remove at91rm9200 legacy board support Nicolas Ferre
2014-11-27 16:06 ` [PATCH 03/11] ARM: at91: switch configuration option to SOC_AT91RM9200 Nicolas Ferre
2014-11-27 16:06 ` [PATCH 04/11] ARM: at91/Kconfig: remove ARCH_AT91RM9200 option for drivers Nicolas Ferre
2014-11-27 16:06 ` [PATCH 05/11] ARM: at91: always USE_OF from now on Nicolas Ferre
2014-11-27 16:06 ` [PATCH 06/11] ARM: at91/trivial: update Kconfig comment to mention SAMA5 Nicolas Ferre
2014-11-27 16:06 ` [PATCH 07/11] ARM: at91: remove all !DT related configuration options Nicolas Ferre
2014-11-27 16:06 ` [PATCH 08/11] ARM: at91: remove clock data in at91sam9n12.c and at91sam9x5.c files Nicolas Ferre
2014-11-27 16:06 ` [PATCH 09/11] ARM: at91: remove old at91-specific clock driver Nicolas Ferre
2014-11-27 16:06 ` [PATCH 10/11] ARM: at91: remove legacy IRQ driver and related code Nicolas Ferre
2014-11-27 16:20 ` Julia Lawall
2014-11-27 16:06 ` [PATCH 11/11] ARM: at91: remove unused IRQ function declarations Nicolas Ferre
2014-11-27 16:49 ` [PATCH 00/11] ARM: at91: remove !DT support for at91rm9200 Arnd Bergmann
2014-11-27 17:12 ` Alexandre Belloni
2014-11-27 17:38 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-11-28 9:36 ` Nicolas Ferre
2014-11-28 10:25 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-11-28 10:48 ` Nicolas Ferre
2014-11-27 23:12 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-11-27 23:39 ` Boris Brezillon
2014-11-27 23:41 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-11-28 0:28 ` Alexandre Belloni
2014-11-28 8:27 ` Alexander Stein
2014-11-28 8:49 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-11-28 11:31 ` Alexandre Belloni
2014-11-28 12:06 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2014-11-28 11:13 ` Boris Brezillon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=25050514.vKmbVUQfkQ@wuerfel \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox