* [PATCH v2] perf arm-spe: Synthesize SPE instruction events @ 2021-12-15 18:46 German Gomez 2021-12-16 1:18 ` Namhyung Kim 2021-12-16 11:11 ` Leo Yan 0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: German Gomez @ 2021-12-15 18:46 UTC (permalink / raw) To: linux-kernel, linux-perf-users, acme Cc: German Gomez, John Garry, Will Deacon, Mathieu Poirier, Leo Yan, Mark Rutland, Alexander Shishkin, Jiri Olsa, Namhyung Kim, linux-arm-kernel Synthesize instruction events per every decoded ARM SPE record. Because Arm SPE implements a hardware-based sample period, and perf implements a software-based one that gets applied on top, also add a warning to make the user aware. Signed-off-by: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com> --- Changes since v1 [https://lore.kernel.org/all/20211117142833.226629-1-german.gomez@arm.com] - Generate events with "--itrace=i" instead of "--itrace=o". - Generate events with virt_addr, phys_addr, and data_src values. --- tools/perf/util/arm-spe.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 58 insertions(+) diff --git a/tools/perf/util/arm-spe.c b/tools/perf/util/arm-spe.c index fccac06b573a..879583822c8f 100644 --- a/tools/perf/util/arm-spe.c +++ b/tools/perf/util/arm-spe.c @@ -58,6 +58,8 @@ struct arm_spe { u8 sample_branch; u8 sample_remote_access; u8 sample_memory; + u8 sample_instructions; + u64 instructions_sample_period; u64 l1d_miss_id; u64 l1d_access_id; @@ -68,6 +70,7 @@ struct arm_spe { u64 branch_miss_id; u64 remote_access_id; u64 memory_id; + u64 instructions_id; u64 kernel_start; @@ -90,6 +93,7 @@ struct arm_spe_queue { u64 time; u64 timestamp; struct thread *thread; + u64 period_instructions; }; static void arm_spe_dump(struct arm_spe *spe __maybe_unused, @@ -202,6 +206,7 @@ static struct arm_spe_queue *arm_spe__alloc_queue(struct arm_spe *spe, speq->pid = -1; speq->tid = -1; speq->cpu = -1; + speq->period_instructions = 0; /* params set */ params.get_trace = arm_spe_get_trace; @@ -351,6 +356,33 @@ static int arm_spe__synth_branch_sample(struct arm_spe_queue *speq, return arm_spe_deliver_synth_event(spe, speq, event, &sample); } +static int arm_spe__synth_instruction_sample(struct arm_spe_queue *speq, + u64 spe_events_id, u64 data_src) +{ + struct arm_spe *spe = speq->spe; + struct arm_spe_record *record = &speq->decoder->record; + union perf_event *event = speq->event_buf; + struct perf_sample sample = { .ip = 0, }; + + /* + * Handles perf instruction sampling period. + */ + speq->period_instructions++; + if (speq->period_instructions < spe->instructions_sample_period) + return 0; + speq->period_instructions = 0; + + arm_spe_prep_sample(spe, speq, event, &sample); + + sample.id = spe_events_id; + sample.stream_id = spe_events_id; + sample.addr = record->virt_addr; + sample.phys_addr = record->phys_addr; + sample.data_src = data_src; + + return arm_spe_deliver_synth_event(spe, speq, event, &sample); +} + #define SPE_MEM_TYPE (ARM_SPE_L1D_ACCESS | ARM_SPE_L1D_MISS | \ ARM_SPE_LLC_ACCESS | ARM_SPE_LLC_MISS | \ ARM_SPE_REMOTE_ACCESS) @@ -480,6 +512,12 @@ static int arm_spe_sample(struct arm_spe_queue *speq) return err; } + if (spe->sample_instructions) { + err = arm_spe__synth_instruction_sample(speq, spe->instructions_id, data_src); + if (err) + return err; + } + return 0; } @@ -1107,6 +1145,26 @@ arm_spe_synth_events(struct arm_spe *spe, struct perf_session *session) return err; spe->memory_id = id; arm_spe_set_event_name(evlist, id, "memory"); + id += 1; + } + + if (spe->synth_opts.instructions) { + if (spe->synth_opts.period_type != PERF_ITRACE_PERIOD_INSTRUCTIONS) + return -EINVAL; + + if (spe->synth_opts.period > 1) + pr_warning("Arm SPE has a hardware-based sample period.\n" + "More instruction events will be discarded by --itrace\n"); + + spe->sample_instructions = true; + attr.config = PERF_COUNT_HW_INSTRUCTIONS; + attr.sample_period = spe->synth_opts.period; + spe->instructions_sample_period = attr.sample_period; + err = arm_spe_synth_event(session, &attr, id); + if (err) + return err; + spe->instructions_id = id; + arm_spe_set_event_name(evlist, id, "instructions"); } return 0; -- 2.25.1 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel ^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] perf arm-spe: Synthesize SPE instruction events 2021-12-15 18:46 [PATCH v2] perf arm-spe: Synthesize SPE instruction events German Gomez @ 2021-12-16 1:18 ` Namhyung Kim 2021-12-16 11:11 ` German Gomez 2021-12-16 11:11 ` Leo Yan 1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Namhyung Kim @ 2021-12-16 1:18 UTC (permalink / raw) To: German Gomez Cc: linux-kernel, linux-perf-users, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, John Garry, Will Deacon, Mathieu Poirier, Leo Yan, Mark Rutland, Alexander Shishkin, Jiri Olsa, linux-arm-kernel Hello, On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 10:46 AM German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com> wrote: > > Synthesize instruction events per every decoded ARM SPE record. > > Because Arm SPE implements a hardware-based sample period, and perf > implements a software-based one that gets applied on top, also add a > warning to make the user aware. > > Signed-off-by: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com> > --- > Changes since v1 [https://lore.kernel.org/all/20211117142833.226629-1-german.gomez@arm.com] > - Generate events with "--itrace=i" instead of "--itrace=o". > - Generate events with virt_addr, phys_addr, and data_src values. > --- > tools/perf/util/arm-spe.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 58 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/arm-spe.c b/tools/perf/util/arm-spe.c > index fccac06b573a..879583822c8f 100644 > --- a/tools/perf/util/arm-spe.c > +++ b/tools/perf/util/arm-spe.c > @@ -58,6 +58,8 @@ struct arm_spe { > u8 sample_branch; > u8 sample_remote_access; > u8 sample_memory; > + u8 sample_instructions; > + u64 instructions_sample_period; > > u64 l1d_miss_id; > u64 l1d_access_id; > @@ -68,6 +70,7 @@ struct arm_spe { > u64 branch_miss_id; > u64 remote_access_id; > u64 memory_id; > + u64 instructions_id; > > u64 kernel_start; > > @@ -90,6 +93,7 @@ struct arm_spe_queue { > u64 time; > u64 timestamp; > struct thread *thread; > + u64 period_instructions; > }; > > static void arm_spe_dump(struct arm_spe *spe __maybe_unused, > @@ -202,6 +206,7 @@ static struct arm_spe_queue *arm_spe__alloc_queue(struct arm_spe *spe, > speq->pid = -1; > speq->tid = -1; > speq->cpu = -1; > + speq->period_instructions = 0; > > /* params set */ > params.get_trace = arm_spe_get_trace; > @@ -351,6 +356,33 @@ static int arm_spe__synth_branch_sample(struct arm_spe_queue *speq, > return arm_spe_deliver_synth_event(spe, speq, event, &sample); > } > > +static int arm_spe__synth_instruction_sample(struct arm_spe_queue *speq, > + u64 spe_events_id, u64 data_src) > +{ > + struct arm_spe *spe = speq->spe; > + struct arm_spe_record *record = &speq->decoder->record; > + union perf_event *event = speq->event_buf; > + struct perf_sample sample = { .ip = 0, }; > + > + /* > + * Handles perf instruction sampling period. > + */ > + speq->period_instructions++; > + if (speq->period_instructions < spe->instructions_sample_period) > + return 0; > + speq->period_instructions = 0; > + > + arm_spe_prep_sample(spe, speq, event, &sample); > + > + sample.id = spe_events_id; > + sample.stream_id = spe_events_id; > + sample.addr = record->virt_addr; > + sample.phys_addr = record->phys_addr; > + sample.data_src = data_src; I think it should set sample.period to spe->instructions_sample_period. Also it can set sample.weight but I think we lost my patch https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211201220855.1260688-1-namhyung@kernel.org Arnaldo, can you please take a look? > + > + return arm_spe_deliver_synth_event(spe, speq, event, &sample); > +} > + > #define SPE_MEM_TYPE (ARM_SPE_L1D_ACCESS | ARM_SPE_L1D_MISS | \ > ARM_SPE_LLC_ACCESS | ARM_SPE_LLC_MISS | \ > ARM_SPE_REMOTE_ACCESS) > @@ -480,6 +512,12 @@ static int arm_spe_sample(struct arm_spe_queue *speq) > return err; > } > > + if (spe->sample_instructions) { > + err = arm_spe__synth_instruction_sample(speq, spe->instructions_id, data_src); > + if (err) > + return err; > + } > + > return 0; > } > > @@ -1107,6 +1145,26 @@ arm_spe_synth_events(struct arm_spe *spe, struct perf_session *session) > return err; > spe->memory_id = id; > arm_spe_set_event_name(evlist, id, "memory"); > + id += 1; > + } > + > + if (spe->synth_opts.instructions) { > + if (spe->synth_opts.period_type != PERF_ITRACE_PERIOD_INSTRUCTIONS) > + return -EINVAL; > + > + if (spe->synth_opts.period > 1) > + pr_warning("Arm SPE has a hardware-based sample period.\n" > + "More instruction events will be discarded by --itrace\n"); > + > + spe->sample_instructions = true; > + attr.config = PERF_COUNT_HW_INSTRUCTIONS; > + attr.sample_period = spe->synth_opts.period; > + spe->instructions_sample_period = attr.sample_period; > + err = arm_spe_synth_event(session, &attr, id); > + if (err) > + return err; > + spe->instructions_id = id; > + arm_spe_set_event_name(evlist, id, "instructions"); Yeah, I think it's a better name than "all". :) Thanks, Namhyung > } > > return 0; > -- > 2.25.1 > _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] perf arm-spe: Synthesize SPE instruction events 2021-12-16 1:18 ` Namhyung Kim @ 2021-12-16 11:11 ` German Gomez 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: German Gomez @ 2021-12-16 11:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Namhyung Kim Cc: linux-kernel, linux-perf-users, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo, John Garry, Will Deacon, Mathieu Poirier, Leo Yan, Mark Rutland, Alexander Shishkin, Jiri Olsa, linux-arm-kernel Hi Namhyung, thanks for your comments. On 16/12/2021 01:18, Namhyung Kim wrote: > Hello, > > On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 10:46 AM German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com> wrote: >> Synthesize instruction events per every decoded ARM SPE record. >> >> Because Arm SPE implements a hardware-based sample period, and perf >> implements a software-based one that gets applied on top, also add a >> warning to make the user aware. >> >> Signed-off-by: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com> >> --- >> Changes since v1 [https://lore.kernel.org/all/20211117142833.226629-1-german.gomez@arm.com] >> - Generate events with "--itrace=i" instead of "--itrace=o". >> - Generate events with virt_addr, phys_addr, and data_src values. >> --- >> tools/perf/util/arm-spe.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 58 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/arm-spe.c b/tools/perf/util/arm-spe.c >> index fccac06b573a..879583822c8f 100644 >> --- a/tools/perf/util/arm-spe.c >> +++ b/tools/perf/util/arm-spe.c >> @@ -58,6 +58,8 @@ struct arm_spe { >> u8 sample_branch; >> u8 sample_remote_access; >> u8 sample_memory; >> + u8 sample_instructions; >> + u64 instructions_sample_period; >> >> u64 l1d_miss_id; >> u64 l1d_access_id; >> @@ -68,6 +70,7 @@ struct arm_spe { >> u64 branch_miss_id; >> u64 remote_access_id; >> u64 memory_id; >> + u64 instructions_id; >> >> u64 kernel_start; >> >> @@ -90,6 +93,7 @@ struct arm_spe_queue { >> u64 time; >> u64 timestamp; >> struct thread *thread; >> + u64 period_instructions; >> }; >> >> static void arm_spe_dump(struct arm_spe *spe __maybe_unused, >> @@ -202,6 +206,7 @@ static struct arm_spe_queue *arm_spe__alloc_queue(struct arm_spe *spe, >> speq->pid = -1; >> speq->tid = -1; >> speq->cpu = -1; >> + speq->period_instructions = 0; >> >> /* params set */ >> params.get_trace = arm_spe_get_trace; >> @@ -351,6 +356,33 @@ static int arm_spe__synth_branch_sample(struct arm_spe_queue *speq, >> return arm_spe_deliver_synth_event(spe, speq, event, &sample); >> } >> >> +static int arm_spe__synth_instruction_sample(struct arm_spe_queue *speq, >> + u64 spe_events_id, u64 data_src) >> +{ >> + struct arm_spe *spe = speq->spe; >> + struct arm_spe_record *record = &speq->decoder->record; >> + union perf_event *event = speq->event_buf; >> + struct perf_sample sample = { .ip = 0, }; >> + >> + /* >> + * Handles perf instruction sampling period. >> + */ >> + speq->period_instructions++; >> + if (speq->period_instructions < spe->instructions_sample_period) >> + return 0; >> + speq->period_instructions = 0; >> + >> + arm_spe_prep_sample(spe, speq, event, &sample); >> + >> + sample.id = spe_events_id; >> + sample.stream_id = spe_events_id; >> + sample.addr = record->virt_addr; >> + sample.phys_addr = record->phys_addr; >> + sample.data_src = data_src; > I think it should set sample.period to spe->instructions_sample_period. Ack! > > Also it can set sample.weight but I think we lost my patch I forgot to apply your latency patch first. I will add it. Thanks, German > > https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211201220855.1260688-1-namhyung@kernel.org > > Arnaldo, can you please take a look? > >> + >> + return arm_spe_deliver_synth_event(spe, speq, event, &sample); >> +} >> + >> #define SPE_MEM_TYPE (ARM_SPE_L1D_ACCESS | ARM_SPE_L1D_MISS | \ >> ARM_SPE_LLC_ACCESS | ARM_SPE_LLC_MISS | \ >> ARM_SPE_REMOTE_ACCESS) >> @@ -480,6 +512,12 @@ static int arm_spe_sample(struct arm_spe_queue *speq) >> return err; >> } >> >> + if (spe->sample_instructions) { >> + err = arm_spe__synth_instruction_sample(speq, spe->instructions_id, data_src); >> + if (err) >> + return err; >> + } >> + >> return 0; >> } >> >> @@ -1107,6 +1145,26 @@ arm_spe_synth_events(struct arm_spe *spe, struct perf_session *session) >> return err; >> spe->memory_id = id; >> arm_spe_set_event_name(evlist, id, "memory"); >> + id += 1; >> + } >> + >> + if (spe->synth_opts.instructions) { >> + if (spe->synth_opts.period_type != PERF_ITRACE_PERIOD_INSTRUCTIONS) >> + return -EINVAL; >> + >> + if (spe->synth_opts.period > 1) >> + pr_warning("Arm SPE has a hardware-based sample period.\n" >> + "More instruction events will be discarded by --itrace\n"); >> + >> + spe->sample_instructions = true; >> + attr.config = PERF_COUNT_HW_INSTRUCTIONS; >> + attr.sample_period = spe->synth_opts.period; >> + spe->instructions_sample_period = attr.sample_period; >> + err = arm_spe_synth_event(session, &attr, id); >> + if (err) >> + return err; >> + spe->instructions_id = id; >> + arm_spe_set_event_name(evlist, id, "instructions"); > Yeah, I think it's a better name than "all". :) > > Thanks, > Namhyung > > >> } >> >> return 0; >> -- >> 2.25.1 >> _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] perf arm-spe: Synthesize SPE instruction events 2021-12-15 18:46 [PATCH v2] perf arm-spe: Synthesize SPE instruction events German Gomez 2021-12-16 1:18 ` Namhyung Kim @ 2021-12-16 11:11 ` Leo Yan 2021-12-16 15:00 ` German Gomez 1 sibling, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread From: Leo Yan @ 2021-12-16 11:11 UTC (permalink / raw) To: German Gomez Cc: linux-kernel, linux-perf-users, acme, John Garry, Will Deacon, Mathieu Poirier, Mark Rutland, Alexander Shishkin, Jiri Olsa, Namhyung Kim, linux-arm-kernel Hi German, On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 06:46:05PM +0000, German Gomez wrote: > Synthesize instruction events per every decoded ARM SPE record. > > Because Arm SPE implements a hardware-based sample period, and perf > implements a software-based one that gets applied on top, also add a > warning to make the user aware. > > Signed-off-by: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com> > --- > Changes since v1 [https://lore.kernel.org/all/20211117142833.226629-1-german.gomez@arm.com] > - Generate events with "--itrace=i" instead of "--itrace=o". > - Generate events with virt_addr, phys_addr, and data_src values. > --- > tools/perf/util/arm-spe.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 1 file changed, 58 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/tools/perf/util/arm-spe.c b/tools/perf/util/arm-spe.c > index fccac06b573a..879583822c8f 100644 > --- a/tools/perf/util/arm-spe.c > +++ b/tools/perf/util/arm-spe.c > @@ -58,6 +58,8 @@ struct arm_spe { > u8 sample_branch; > u8 sample_remote_access; > u8 sample_memory; > + u8 sample_instructions; > + u64 instructions_sample_period; > > u64 l1d_miss_id; > u64 l1d_access_id; > @@ -68,6 +70,7 @@ struct arm_spe { > u64 branch_miss_id; > u64 remote_access_id; > u64 memory_id; > + u64 instructions_id; > > u64 kernel_start; > > @@ -90,6 +93,7 @@ struct arm_spe_queue { > u64 time; > u64 timestamp; > struct thread *thread; > + u64 period_instructions; > }; > > static void arm_spe_dump(struct arm_spe *spe __maybe_unused, > @@ -202,6 +206,7 @@ static struct arm_spe_queue *arm_spe__alloc_queue(struct arm_spe *spe, > speq->pid = -1; > speq->tid = -1; > speq->cpu = -1; > + speq->period_instructions = 0; > > /* params set */ > params.get_trace = arm_spe_get_trace; > @@ -351,6 +356,33 @@ static int arm_spe__synth_branch_sample(struct arm_spe_queue *speq, > return arm_spe_deliver_synth_event(spe, speq, event, &sample); > } > > +static int arm_spe__synth_instruction_sample(struct arm_spe_queue *speq, > + u64 spe_events_id, u64 data_src) > +{ > + struct arm_spe *spe = speq->spe; > + struct arm_spe_record *record = &speq->decoder->record; > + union perf_event *event = speq->event_buf; > + struct perf_sample sample = { .ip = 0, }; > + > + /* > + * Handles perf instruction sampling period. > + */ > + speq->period_instructions++; > + if (speq->period_instructions < spe->instructions_sample_period) > + return 0; > + speq->period_instructions = 0; > + > + arm_spe_prep_sample(spe, speq, event, &sample); > + > + sample.id = spe_events_id; > + sample.stream_id = spe_events_id; > + sample.addr = record->virt_addr; > + sample.phys_addr = record->phys_addr; > + sample.data_src = data_src; > + > + return arm_spe_deliver_synth_event(spe, speq, event, &sample); > +} > + > #define SPE_MEM_TYPE (ARM_SPE_L1D_ACCESS | ARM_SPE_L1D_MISS | \ > ARM_SPE_LLC_ACCESS | ARM_SPE_LLC_MISS | \ > ARM_SPE_REMOTE_ACCESS) > @@ -480,6 +512,12 @@ static int arm_spe_sample(struct arm_spe_queue *speq) > return err; > } > > + if (spe->sample_instructions) { > + err = arm_spe__synth_instruction_sample(speq, spe->instructions_id, data_src); > + if (err) > + return err; > + } > + > return 0; > } > > @@ -1107,6 +1145,26 @@ arm_spe_synth_events(struct arm_spe *spe, struct perf_session *session) > return err; > spe->memory_id = id; > arm_spe_set_event_name(evlist, id, "memory"); > + id += 1; > + } > + > + if (spe->synth_opts.instructions) { > + if (spe->synth_opts.period_type != PERF_ITRACE_PERIOD_INSTRUCTIONS) > + return -EINVAL; Will this break some perf commands, like "perf report" or other perf report commands? See the the function arm_spe_process_auxtrace_info(), it invokes [1]: itrace_synth_opts__set_default(&spe->synth_opts, false); So synth_opts.instructions is initialized to true, synth_opts.period_type is set to PERF_ITRACE_DEFAULT_PERIOD_TYPE (2), so the perf tool will directly bail out when synth_opts.period_type is not equal to PERF_ITRACE_PERIOD_INSTRUCTIONS. If we only support period type PERF_ITRACE_PERIOD_INSTRUCTIONS at current stage, I think we use the checking like below: if (spe->synth_opts.instructions && (spe->synth_opts.period_type == PERF_ITRACE_PERIOD_INSTRUCTIONS)) { ... } [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/tools/perf/util/arm-spe.c#n1180 > + > + if (spe->synth_opts.period > 1) > + pr_warning("Arm SPE has a hardware-based sample period.\n" > + "More instruction events will be discarded by --itrace\n"); Okay, Since Arm SPE is statistical profiling, so this is the right thing to do. Please also address Namhyung's two comments, the rest of this patch looks good to me. Thanks, Leo > + > + spe->sample_instructions = true; > + attr.config = PERF_COUNT_HW_INSTRUCTIONS; > + attr.sample_period = spe->synth_opts.period; > + spe->instructions_sample_period = attr.sample_period; > + err = arm_spe_synth_event(session, &attr, id); > + if (err) > + return err; > + spe->instructions_id = id; > + arm_spe_set_event_name(evlist, id, "instructions"); > } > > return 0; > -- > 2.25.1 > _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v2] perf arm-spe: Synthesize SPE instruction events 2021-12-16 11:11 ` Leo Yan @ 2021-12-16 15:00 ` German Gomez 0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread From: German Gomez @ 2021-12-16 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Leo Yan Cc: linux-kernel, linux-perf-users, acme, John Garry, Will Deacon, Mathieu Poirier, Mark Rutland, Alexander Shishkin, Jiri Olsa, Namhyung Kim, linux-arm-kernel Hi Leo, Thanks for your comments. I'll send a revised patch shortly. Thanks, German On 16/12/2021 11:11, Leo Yan wrote: > Hi German, > > On Wed, Dec 15, 2021 at 06:46:05PM +0000, German Gomez wrote: >> Synthesize instruction events per every decoded ARM SPE record. >> >> Because Arm SPE implements a hardware-based sample period, and perf >> implements a software-based one that gets applied on top, also add a >> warning to make the user aware. >> >> Signed-off-by: German Gomez <german.gomez@arm.com> >> --- >> Changes since v1 [https://lore.kernel.org/all/20211117142833.226629-1-german.gomez@arm.com] >> - Generate events with "--itrace=i" instead of "--itrace=o". >> - Generate events with virt_addr, phys_addr, and data_src values. >> --- >> tools/perf/util/arm-spe.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 1 file changed, 58 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/arm-spe.c b/tools/perf/util/arm-spe.c >> index fccac06b573a..879583822c8f 100644 >> --- a/tools/perf/util/arm-spe.c >> +++ b/tools/perf/util/arm-spe.c >> @@ -58,6 +58,8 @@ struct arm_spe { >> u8 sample_branch; >> u8 sample_remote_access; >> u8 sample_memory; >> + u8 sample_instructions; >> + u64 instructions_sample_period; >> >> u64 l1d_miss_id; >> u64 l1d_access_id; >> @@ -68,6 +70,7 @@ struct arm_spe { >> u64 branch_miss_id; >> u64 remote_access_id; >> u64 memory_id; >> + u64 instructions_id; >> >> u64 kernel_start; >> >> @@ -90,6 +93,7 @@ struct arm_spe_queue { >> u64 time; >> u64 timestamp; >> struct thread *thread; >> + u64 period_instructions; >> }; >> >> static void arm_spe_dump(struct arm_spe *spe __maybe_unused, >> @@ -202,6 +206,7 @@ static struct arm_spe_queue *arm_spe__alloc_queue(struct arm_spe *spe, >> speq->pid = -1; >> speq->tid = -1; >> speq->cpu = -1; >> + speq->period_instructions = 0; >> >> /* params set */ >> params.get_trace = arm_spe_get_trace; >> @@ -351,6 +356,33 @@ static int arm_spe__synth_branch_sample(struct arm_spe_queue *speq, >> return arm_spe_deliver_synth_event(spe, speq, event, &sample); >> } >> >> +static int arm_spe__synth_instruction_sample(struct arm_spe_queue *speq, >> + u64 spe_events_id, u64 data_src) >> +{ >> + struct arm_spe *spe = speq->spe; >> + struct arm_spe_record *record = &speq->decoder->record; >> + union perf_event *event = speq->event_buf; >> + struct perf_sample sample = { .ip = 0, }; >> + >> + /* >> + * Handles perf instruction sampling period. >> + */ >> + speq->period_instructions++; >> + if (speq->period_instructions < spe->instructions_sample_period) >> + return 0; >> + speq->period_instructions = 0; >> + >> + arm_spe_prep_sample(spe, speq, event, &sample); >> + >> + sample.id = spe_events_id; >> + sample.stream_id = spe_events_id; >> + sample.addr = record->virt_addr; >> + sample.phys_addr = record->phys_addr; >> + sample.data_src = data_src; >> + >> + return arm_spe_deliver_synth_event(spe, speq, event, &sample); >> +} >> + >> #define SPE_MEM_TYPE (ARM_SPE_L1D_ACCESS | ARM_SPE_L1D_MISS | \ >> ARM_SPE_LLC_ACCESS | ARM_SPE_LLC_MISS | \ >> ARM_SPE_REMOTE_ACCESS) >> @@ -480,6 +512,12 @@ static int arm_spe_sample(struct arm_spe_queue *speq) >> return err; >> } >> >> + if (spe->sample_instructions) { >> + err = arm_spe__synth_instruction_sample(speq, spe->instructions_id, data_src); >> + if (err) >> + return err; >> + } >> + >> return 0; >> } >> >> @@ -1107,6 +1145,26 @@ arm_spe_synth_events(struct arm_spe *spe, struct perf_session *session) >> return err; >> spe->memory_id = id; >> arm_spe_set_event_name(evlist, id, "memory"); >> + id += 1; >> + } >> + >> + if (spe->synth_opts.instructions) { >> + if (spe->synth_opts.period_type != PERF_ITRACE_PERIOD_INSTRUCTIONS) >> + return -EINVAL; > Will this break some perf commands, like "perf report" or other perf > report commands? > > See the the function arm_spe_process_auxtrace_info(), it invokes [1]: > > itrace_synth_opts__set_default(&spe->synth_opts, false); > > So synth_opts.instructions is initialized to true, > synth_opts.period_type is set to PERF_ITRACE_DEFAULT_PERIOD_TYPE (2), > so the perf tool will directly bail out when synth_opts.period_type is > not equal to PERF_ITRACE_PERIOD_INSTRUCTIONS. > > If we only support period type PERF_ITRACE_PERIOD_INSTRUCTIONS at > current stage, I think we use the checking like below: > > if (spe->synth_opts.instructions && > (spe->synth_opts.period_type == PERF_ITRACE_PERIOD_INSTRUCTIONS)) { > > ... > } > > [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/tools/perf/util/arm-spe.c#n1180 > >> + >> + if (spe->synth_opts.period > 1) >> + pr_warning("Arm SPE has a hardware-based sample period.\n" >> + "More instruction events will be discarded by --itrace\n"); > Okay, Since Arm SPE is statistical profiling, so this is the right thing to > do. > > Please also address Namhyung's two comments, the rest of this patch looks > good to me. > > Thanks, > Leo > >> + >> + spe->sample_instructions = true; >> + attr.config = PERF_COUNT_HW_INSTRUCTIONS; >> + attr.sample_period = spe->synth_opts.period; >> + spe->instructions_sample_period = attr.sample_period; >> + err = arm_spe_synth_event(session, &attr, id); >> + if (err) >> + return err; >> + spe->instructions_id = id; >> + arm_spe_set_event_name(evlist, id, "instructions"); >> } >> >> return 0; >> -- >> 2.25.1 >> _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2021-12-16 15:01 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2021-12-15 18:46 [PATCH v2] perf arm-spe: Synthesize SPE instruction events German Gomez 2021-12-16 1:18 ` Namhyung Kim 2021-12-16 11:11 ` German Gomez 2021-12-16 11:11 ` Leo Yan 2021-12-16 15:00 ` German Gomez
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox