From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v5 0/6] ARM64: Add support for FSL's LS2085A SoC
Date: Sat, 15 Nov 2014 12:15:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4825970.YSq0Ouk2Yk@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bf2f6ea889034e288f3d4a976df9d16f@BY1PR0301MB1303.namprd03.prod.outlook.com>
On Saturday 15 November 2014 11:06:42 bhupesh.sharma at freescale.com wrote:
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Arnd Bergmann [mailto:arnd at arndb.de]
> > Sent: Saturday, November 15, 2014 4:32 PM
> > To: Sharma Bhupesh-B45370
> > Cc: Catalin.Marinas at arm.com; mark.rutland at arm.com; linux-arm-
> > kernel at lists.infradead.org; grant.likely at secretlab.ca;
> > marc.zyngier at arm.com; rob.herring at linaro.org;
> > bhupesh.sharma at freescal.com; Yoder Stuart-B08248;
> > arnab_basu at rocketmail.com
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/6] ARM64: Add support for FSL's LS2085A SoC
> >
> > On Saturday 15 November 2014 16:16:25 Bhupesh Sharma wrote:
> > > This patchset adds the support for FSL's LS2085A SoC which is based on
> > > ARMv8 architecture.
> > >
> > > This patchset also has patches which address DT compatible strings for
> > > nodes which appear un-documented.
> > >
> > > The enable-method for the CPU nodes is left for the bootloader (u-boot
> > > or UEFI) to patch-up which is expected to be PSCI v0.2
> > >
> >
> > Looks all good to me. Are you planning to send a pull request to
> > arm at kernel.org, or should we pick up the patches directly (provided no
> > more new review comments)?
> >
>
> It would be great if you can pick the patches directly (ofcourse, if there are
> no new comments).
>
>
Ok, let's wait a few more days then, once everyone is happy please send
them "To: arm at kernel.org" with a request for us to merge them.
Arnd
prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-15 11:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-15 10:46 [PATCH v5 0/6] ARM64: Add support for FSL's LS2085A SoC Bhupesh Sharma
2014-11-15 10:46 ` [PATCH v5 1/6] Documentation: DT: Add bindings for FSL NS16550A UART Bhupesh Sharma
2014-11-15 10:46 ` [PATCH v5 2/6] Documentation: DT: Add entry for FSL LS2085A SoC and Simulator model Bhupesh Sharma
2014-11-15 10:46 ` [PATCH v5 3/6] Documentation: DT: Add entry for FSL Management Complex Bhupesh Sharma
2014-11-15 10:46 ` [PATCH v5 4/6] arm64: Add DTS support for FSL's LS2085A SoC Bhupesh Sharma
2014-11-16 18:39 ` Marc Zyngier
2014-11-15 10:46 ` [PATCH v5 5/6] arm64: dts/Makefile: Add support for FSL's LS2085A simulator model Bhupesh Sharma
2014-11-15 10:46 ` [PATCH v5 6/6] arm64: Add support for FSL's LS2085A SoC in Kconfig and defconfig Bhupesh Sharma
2014-11-15 11:02 ` [PATCH v5 0/6] ARM64: Add support for FSL's LS2085A SoC Arnd Bergmann
2014-11-15 11:06 ` bhupesh.sharma at freescale.com
2014-11-15 11:15 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4825970.YSq0Ouk2Yk@wuerfel \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox