Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCHv3 1/3] ARM: mm: allow sub-architectures to override PCI I/O memory type
Date: Thu, 15 May 2014 16:32:43 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4972763.mtuLYh6sDH@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140515142924.GI27594@arm.com>

On Thursday 15 May 2014 15:29:24 Will Deacon wrote:
>  Thu, May 15, 2014 at 02:51:30PM +0100, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> > On Thu, 15 May 2014 15:21:25 +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > > On Thursday 15 May 2014 11:18:37 Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> > > > @@ -445,7 +452,7 @@ int pci_ioremap_io(unsigned int offset, phys_addr_t phys_addr)
> > > >         return ioremap_page_range(PCI_IO_VIRT_BASE + offset,
> > > >                                   PCI_IO_VIRT_BASE + offset + SZ_64K,
> > > >                                   phys_addr,
> > > > -                                 __pgprot(get_mem_type(MT_DEVICE)->prot_pte));
> > > > +                                 __pgprot(get_mem_type(pci_ioremap_mem_type)->prot_pte));
> > > >  }
> > > >  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pci_ioremap_io);
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > As discussed on IRC, I think we'd be better off making this a strong-ordered
> > > mapping for all platforms unconditionally. The PCI I/O space semantics
> > > require non-posted writes, which is the main difference between device
> > > and SO mappings, so the same fix is required both for mvebu as a workaround
> > > for the deadlock as well as for everyone else as a fix for an incorrect
> > > PCI behavior.
> > 
> > Ok, I'll take that into account when posting a v4.
> 
> Actually, I don't think this reasoning is correct. The memory type here
> applies to accesses mastered by the CPU onto AXI -- it is the job of the
> AXI/PCI bridge (i.e. the host controller) to ensure that writes are not
> posted, so this is irrelevant.
> 
> Of course, the erratum in question requires SO memory, but that's an
> entirely different problem. The default should remain as device memory.

How can a write be non-posted on the PCI bus if it's posted on AXI?
The way I understand it, the CPU would continue with the next instruction
as soon as the write has made it out to the AXI fabric, i.e. before
the PIO instruction is complete. If this is used to synchronize with a
DMA, there is no guarantee that the transaction from PCI will be visible
in memory by then.

	Arnd

  reply	other threads:[~2014-05-15 14:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 33+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-05-15  9:18 [PATCHv3 0/3] ARM: implement workaround for Cortex-A9/PL310/PCIe deadlock Thomas Petazzoni
2014-05-15  9:18 ` [PATCHv3 1/3] ARM: mm: allow sub-architectures to override PCI I/O memory type Thomas Petazzoni
2014-05-15 13:21   ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-05-15 13:51     ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-05-15 14:29       ` Will Deacon
2014-05-15 14:32         ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2014-05-15 15:34           ` Will Deacon
2014-05-15 15:55             ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-05-16  9:53               ` Will Deacon
2014-05-19 13:19                 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-05-19 14:23                   ` Will Deacon
2014-05-19 16:40                     ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-05-19 16:50                       ` Will Deacon
2014-05-19 17:04                         ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-05-21  5:20                 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2014-05-21  8:20                   ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-05-15 17:53             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2014-05-16  9:57               ` Will Deacon
2014-05-16 15:33                 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2014-05-15  9:18 ` [PATCHv3 2/3] ARM: mm: add support for HW coherent systems in PL310 Thomas Petazzoni
2014-05-15  9:36   ` Catalin Marinas
2014-05-15 11:39     ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-05-15 13:23   ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-05-15 13:35   ` Rob Herring
2014-05-15 13:46     ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-05-15  9:18 ` [PATCHv3 3/3] ARM: mvebu: implement L2/PCIe deadlock workaround Thomas Petazzoni
2014-05-15  9:36   ` Catalin Marinas
2014-05-15 13:21   ` Jason Cooper
2014-05-15 13:50     ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-05-15 15:31       ` Jason Cooper
2014-05-16  7:19         ` Thomas Petazzoni
2014-05-15 13:26   ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-05-15 14:22     ` Thomas Petazzoni

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4972763.mtuLYh6sDH@wuerfel \
    --to=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox