From: "Stefan Dösinger" <stefandoesinger@gmail.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linusw@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/8] ARM: zte: Bring back zx29 UART support
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2026 00:21:51 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5075672.GXAFRqVoOG@strix> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAD++jLkkV0h5R5=2sWNcPCV8h9vJHXCRsuaFxS7_bBZH0nZKUg@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1081 bytes --]
Am Montag, 20. April 2026, 16:00:24 Ostafrikanische Zeit schrieben Sie:
> Topic should be prefixed:
> "amba/serial: amba-pl011: ..."
I'll change it
> Interesting with the AMBA pseudo-ID, but I kind of like the idea.
It wasn't my idea. That's - as the description says - the code that was once
upstream before it got removed in 89d4f98ae90d. This is also why the
ZX_UART011_* defines still exist.
I re-checked if the device identifies itself in the mmio area in any way, and
that I maybe got the size wrong - but that was not the case, everything past
the ZX_UART011_* registers is zero until the next device starts.
> Things without bit 7 set such as ARMs 0x41 and Qualcomms
> 0x51 are kind of cowboy values however. LSI 0xb6 is the only
> vendor actually following the standard.
> You could use 0x7e.
Another idea I considered is using ZTE's 0x8c (assuming that "Microelectronics
Institute ZTE" is the same ZTE that made the board), but then I would have to
invent a device number, ideally without clashing with an existing ZTE device.
Thanks for the review,
Stefan
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 870 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-20 21:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-14 21:12 [PATCH v3 0/8] Add support for ZTE zx297520v3 Stefan Dösinger
2026-04-14 21:12 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] ARM: zte: Add zx297520v3 platform support Stefan Dösinger
2026-04-20 12:36 ` Linus Walleij
2026-04-14 21:12 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] dt-bindings: arm: Add zx297520v3 board binding Stefan Dösinger
2026-04-15 6:45 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2026-04-14 21:12 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] ARM: dts: Add D-Link DWR-932M support Stefan Dösinger
2026-04-14 21:12 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] ARM: zte: Add support for zx29 low level debug Stefan Dösinger
2026-04-20 12:37 ` Linus Walleij
2026-04-14 21:12 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] ARM: dts: Add an armv7 timer for zx297520v3 Stefan Dösinger
2026-04-14 21:12 ` [PATCH v3 6/8] ARM: zte: Bring back zx29 UART support Stefan Dösinger
2026-04-20 13:00 ` Linus Walleij
2026-04-20 21:21 ` Stefan Dösinger [this message]
2026-04-21 8:55 ` Linus Walleij
2026-04-14 21:12 ` [PATCH v3 7/8] ARM: dts: Declare UART1 on zx297520v3 boards Stefan Dösinger
2026-04-14 21:12 ` [PATCH v3 8/8] ARM: defconfig: Add a zx29 defconfig file Stefan Dösinger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5075672.GXAFRqVoOG@strix \
--to=stefandoesinger@gmail.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linusw@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox