From: Bibek Kumar Patro <quic_bibekkum@quicinc.com>
To: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>, <robdclark@gmail.com>,
<will@kernel.org>, <joro@8bytes.org>, <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
<jsnitsel@redhat.com>, <robh@kernel.org>,
<krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>, <quic_c_gdjako@quicinc.com>,
<dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Cc: <iommu@lists.linux.dev>, <linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v16 3/5] iommu/arm-smmu: add support for PRR bit setup
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2024 18:44:01 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <531d0144-e027-4589-b4ef-79f02583df8b@quicinc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2d651f1b-4f51-4984-903f-7f5a14151f84@arm.com>
On 10/29/2024 6:59 PM, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 2024-10-08 1:54 pm, Bibek Kumar Patro wrote:
>> Add an adreno-smmu-priv interface for drm/msm to call
>> into arm-smmu-qcom and initiate the PRR bit setup or reset
>> sequence as per request.
>>
>> This will be used by GPU to setup the PRR bit and related
>> configuration registers through adreno-smmu private
>> interface instead of directly poking the smmu hardware.
>>
>> Suggested-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Bibek Kumar Patro <quic_bibekkum@quicinc.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++
>> drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h | 2 ++
>> include/linux/adreno-smmu-priv.h | 10 +++++-
>> 3 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c b/drivers/
>> iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
>> index 6e0a2a43e45a..38ac9cab763b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu-qcom.c
>> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
>>
>> #define CPRE (1 << 1)
>> #define CMTLB (1 << 0)
>> +#define GFX_ACTLR_PRR (1 << 5)
>>
>> static struct qcom_smmu *to_qcom_smmu(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
>> {
>> @@ -109,6 +110,40 @@ static void
>> qcom_adreno_smmu_resume_translation(const void *cookie, bool termina
>> arm_smmu_cb_write(smmu, cfg->cbndx, ARM_SMMU_CB_RESUME, reg);
>> }
>>
>> +static void qcom_adreno_smmu_set_prr_bit(const void *cookie, bool set)
>> +{
>> + struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain = (void *)cookie;
>> + struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = smmu_domain->smmu;
>> + const struct device_node *np = smmu->dev->of_node;
>> + struct arm_smmu_cfg *cfg = &smmu_domain->cfg;
>> + u32 reg = 0;
>> +
>> + if (of_device_is_compatible(np, "qcom,smmu-500") &&
>> + of_device_is_compatible(np, "qcom,adreno-smmu")) {
>
> These conditions aren't going to change between calls - wouldn't it make
> more sense to conditionally assign the callbacks in the first place? Not
> the biggest deal if this is a one-off context-setup type thing, just
> that it looks a little funky.
>
Let me know if you want to pursue this still.
From the current PRR implementation in the graphics
vendor layer, this seems to be just setup kind-of thing.
Also if we keep this conditional check before assigning callbacks,
and vendor layer caller won't be having any such check,
wouldn't it be an issue in unsupported platforms (!qcom,smmu-500 or
!qcom,adreno-smmu)
as the callbacks won't be assigned?
So as per my understanding I think it would be safe to keep the
condition check here?
Thanks & regards,
Bibek
> Thanks,
> Robin.
>
>> + reg = arm_smmu_cb_read(smmu, cfg->cbndx, ARM_SMMU_CB_ACTLR);
>> + reg &= ~GFX_ACTLR_PRR;
>> + if (set)
>> + reg |= FIELD_PREP(GFX_ACTLR_PRR, 1);
>> + arm_smmu_cb_write(smmu, cfg->cbndx, ARM_SMMU_CB_ACTLR, reg);
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void qcom_adreno_smmu_set_prr_addr(const void *cookie,
>> phys_addr_t page_addr)
>> +{
>> + struct arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain = (void *)cookie;
>> + struct arm_smmu_device *smmu = smmu_domain->smmu;
>> + const struct device_node *np = smmu->dev->of_node;
>> +
>> + if (of_device_is_compatible(np, "qcom,smmu-500") &&
>> + of_device_is_compatible(np, "qcom,adreno-smmu")) {
>> + writel_relaxed(lower_32_bits(page_addr),
>> + smmu->base + ARM_SMMU_GFX_PRR_CFG_LADDR);
>> +
>> + writel_relaxed(upper_32_bits(page_addr),
>> + smmu->base + ARM_SMMU_GFX_PRR_CFG_UADDR);
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> #define QCOM_ADRENO_SMMU_GPU_SID 0
>>
>> static bool qcom_adreno_smmu_is_gpu_device(struct device *dev)
>> @@ -249,6 +284,8 @@ static int qcom_adreno_smmu_init_context(struct
>> arm_smmu_domain *smmu_domain,
>> priv->get_fault_info = qcom_adreno_smmu_get_fault_info;
>> priv->set_stall = qcom_adreno_smmu_set_stall;
>> priv->resume_translation = qcom_adreno_smmu_resume_translation;
>> + priv->set_prr_bit = qcom_adreno_smmu_set_prr_bit;
>> + priv->set_prr_addr = qcom_adreno_smmu_set_prr_addr;
>>
>> return 0;
>> }
>> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h b/drivers/iommu/
>> arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h
>> index e2aeb511ae90..2dbf3243b5ad 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h
>> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.h
>> @@ -154,6 +154,8 @@ enum arm_smmu_cbar_type {
>> #define ARM_SMMU_SCTLR_M BIT(0)
>>
>> #define ARM_SMMU_CB_ACTLR 0x4
>> +#define ARM_SMMU_GFX_PRR_CFG_LADDR 0x6008
>> +#define ARM_SMMU_GFX_PRR_CFG_UADDR 0x600C
>>
>> #define ARM_SMMU_CB_RESUME 0x8
>> #define ARM_SMMU_RESUME_TERMINATE BIT(0)
>> diff --git a/include/linux/adreno-smmu-priv.h b/include/linux/adreno-
>> smmu-priv.h
>> index c637e0997f6d..03466eb16933 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/adreno-smmu-priv.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/adreno-smmu-priv.h
>> @@ -49,7 +49,13 @@ struct adreno_smmu_fault_info {
>> * before set_ttbr0_cfg(). If stalling on fault is
>> enabled,
>> * the GPU driver must call resume_translation()
>> * @resume_translation: Resume translation after a fault
>> - *
>> + * @set_prr_bit: Extendible interface to be used by GPU to modify the
>> + * ACTLR register bits, currently used to configure
>> + * Partially-Resident-Region (PRR) bit for feature's
>> + * setup and reset sequence as requested.
>> + * @set_prr_addr: Configure the PRR_CFG_*ADDR register with the
>> + * physical address of PRR page passed from
>> + * GPU driver.
>> *
>> * The GPU driver (drm/msm) and adreno-smmu work together for
>> controlling
>> * the GPU's SMMU instance. This is by necessity, as the GPU is
>> directly
>> @@ -67,6 +73,8 @@ struct adreno_smmu_priv {
>> void (*get_fault_info)(const void *cookie, struct
>> adreno_smmu_fault_info *info);
>> void (*set_stall)(const void *cookie, bool enabled);
>> void (*resume_translation)(const void *cookie, bool terminate);
>> + void (*set_prr_bit)(const void *cookie, bool set);
>> + void (*set_prr_addr)(const void *cookie, phys_addr_t page_addr);
>> };
>>
>> #endif /* __ADRENO_SMMU_PRIV_H */
>> --
>> 2.34.1
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-30 13:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-08 12:54 [PATCH v16 0/5] iommu/arm-smmu: introduction of ACTLR implementation for Qualcomm SoCs Bibek Kumar Patro
2024-10-08 12:54 ` [PATCH v16 1/5] iommu/arm-smmu: re-enable context caching in smmu reset operation Bibek Kumar Patro
2024-10-24 12:52 ` Will Deacon
2024-10-25 14:21 ` Bibek Kumar Patro
2024-10-29 12:47 ` Will Deacon
2024-10-29 13:25 ` Robin Murphy
2024-10-30 11:30 ` Bibek Kumar Patro
2024-11-01 12:10 ` Will Deacon
2024-11-04 6:31 ` Bibek Kumar Patro
2024-11-04 11:10 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2024-11-05 11:37 ` Will Deacon
2024-11-06 7:40 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2024-10-28 21:12 ` Rob Clark
2024-10-08 12:54 ` [PATCH v16 2/5] iommu/arm-smmu: refactor qcom_smmu structure to include single pointer Bibek Kumar Patro
2024-10-28 21:13 ` Rob Clark
2024-10-08 12:54 ` [PATCH v16 3/5] iommu/arm-smmu: add support for PRR bit setup Bibek Kumar Patro
2024-10-28 21:13 ` Rob Clark
2024-10-29 13:29 ` Robin Murphy
2024-10-30 13:14 ` Bibek Kumar Patro [this message]
2024-10-30 15:23 ` Robin Murphy
2024-10-30 16:58 ` Rob Clark
2024-10-30 20:27 ` Bibek Kumar Patro
2024-10-08 12:54 ` [PATCH v16 4/5] iommu/arm-smmu: introduction of ACTLR for custom prefetcher settings Bibek Kumar Patro
2024-10-09 19:02 ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2024-10-28 21:14 ` Rob Clark
2024-10-08 12:54 ` [PATCH v16 5/5] iommu/arm-smmu: add ACTLR data and support for qcom_smmu_500 Bibek Kumar Patro
2024-10-28 21:16 ` Rob Clark
2024-10-29 12:40 ` Bibek Kumar Patro
2024-10-29 13:36 ` Robin Murphy
2024-10-23 19:07 ` [PATCH v16 0/5] iommu/arm-smmu: introduction of ACTLR implementation for Qualcomm SoCs Bibek Kumar Patro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=531d0144-e027-4589-b4ef-79f02583df8b@quicinc.com \
--to=quic_bibekkum@quicinc.com \
--cc=dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=jsnitsel@redhat.com \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=quic_c_gdjako@quicinc.com \
--cc=robdclark@gmail.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox