From: radioconfusion@gmail.com (radioconfusion at gmail.com)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [crypto] [marvell-cesa] Possible regression after Linux 4.7
Date: Fri, 09 Sep 2016 10:24:50 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <57d263c4.d5002e0a.8975e.0df2@mx.google.com> (raw)
Hello,
Thu, 8 Sep 2016 16:52:16 +0200, Romain Perier wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm testing the marvell-cesa -driver on Armada 385 board and I think I've found
> > a regression between Linux 4.7 and 4.8-rc4.
> > I want to accelerate my curl connections. So I compiled the 4.8-rc4 with
> > marvell-cesa enabled and HEAD revision of cryptodev-linux.
> >
> > Here is my output:
> >
> > ~# uname -r
> > 4.8.0-rc4
> > ~# modprobe cryptodev
> > ~# modprobe marvell-cesa
> > ~# curl -k --ciphers AES256-SHA256 https://myserver/myfile >/dev/null
> > % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current
> > Dload Upload Total Spent Left Speed
> > 19 200M 19 39.7M 0 0 16.2M 0 0:00:12 0:00:02 0:00:10 16.2M
> > curl: (56) SSL read: error:1408F119:SSL routines:SSL3_GET_RECORD:decryption
> > failed or bad record mac, errno 0
> >
--- snip ---
>
> Thank you for your feedbacks.
> I can reproduce the issue with and without multiple engines.
Thank you for your testing. Do you mean that you can reproduce it with
Linux 4.7 too?
> However, I have found an interesting thing, If I use only --ciphers
> AES256, it works perfectly fine, could you confirm this ?
Yes, I can confirm. And I have found the reason too.
Most of available ciphers will not be accelerated at all.
Only these ones I have verified to be accelerated by cesa:
AES256-SHA256
AES256-SHA
AES128-SHA256
AES128-SHA
When cesa is working, I can see "irq/42-f1090000" on process list of top(1) and
curl doesn't take all of available cpu.
It's not easy to detect acceleration by performance because I tested with
Linux 4.7 and older cryptodev (1.8 release) and I got average curl throughput
~22 MiB/s with AES256-SHA256 + cesa. Without cesa I got ~20 MiB/s average with
same configuration.
> In any case, I will investigate.
Thank you very much.
Best Regards,
Jussi
next reply other threads:[~2016-09-09 7:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-09-09 7:24 radioconfusion at gmail.com [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2016-11-07 8:53 [crypto] [marvell-cesa] Possible regression after Linux 4.7 radioconfusion at gmail.com
2016-10-31 13:59 radioconfusion at gmail.com
2016-11-03 13:57 ` Romain Perier
2016-12-05 9:19 ` Romain Perier
2016-09-06 5:27 radioconfusion at gmail.com
2016-09-08 14:52 ` Romain Perier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=57d263c4.d5002e0a.8975e.0df2@mx.google.com \
--to=radioconfusion@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox