Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH v2 0/2] Add SMCCC cache clean/invalidate provider
@ 2026-06-08 22:07 Srirangan Madhavan
  2026-06-08 22:07 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] arm64: smccc: add cache clean/invalidate IDs and return codes Srirangan Madhavan
                   ` (2 more replies)
  0 siblings, 3 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Srirangan Madhavan @ 2026-06-08 22:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mark Rutland, Lorenzo Pieralisi, Sudeep Holla, Conor Dooley,
	Jonathan Cameron
  Cc: Catalin Marinas, Will Deacon, Dan Williams, Thierry Reding,
	Jonathan Hunter, Souvik Chakravarty, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-kernel, linux-tegra, Srirangan Madhavan

This series adds an arm64 backend for memregion cache invalidation users
based on the Arm SMCCC cache clean+invalidate interface.

Per DEN0028, this interface targets systems where a Normal Cacheable
memory region can be modified in ways that are not handled by usual PE
coherency mechanisms, and where VA-based CMOs may be too slow or
insufficient for large ranges and/or system-cache implementations.

Representative use cases include device-backed memory state transitions
where stale CPU/system cache lines must be invalidated reliably (for
example secure erase, reset/offline flows, and dynamic memory
reconfiguration).

Patch 1 introduces the Arm SMCCC cache clean/invalidate function IDs and
transient return codes needed by callers [1].

Patch 2 adds a cache maintenance provider that:
- discovers SMCCC support and attributes at init time
- registers with the generic cache coherency framework used by
  cpu_cache_invalidate_memregion()
- handles transient BUSY/RATE_LIMITED responses with bounded retries

This patch set does not add a software fallback path; when firmware does
not implement the SMCCC cache maintenance interface, the provider is not
registered and existing behavior is preserved.

Reference:
[1] https://developer.arm.com/documentation/den0028/latest

Note: Jonathan Cameron raised whether DEN0028 v1.7 BET0 is sufficient
for merge. Input from Arm maintainers / SMCCC spec owners on that point
would be appreciated.

Changes since v1:
- Added Jonathan Cameron's Reviewed-by tags.
- Clarified the ARM_SMCCC_CACHE Kconfig help text.
- Added a Makefile comment identifying the providers that depend on
  CACHEMAINT_FOR_HOTPLUG.
- Dropped the final-backoff-sleep skip in the retry loop.

Changes since RFC:
- Dropped the RFC tag.
- Moved the provider from arch/arm64/mm to drivers/cache.
- Added a dedicated CONFIG_ARM_SMCCC_CACHE option under the existing
  CACHEMAINT_FOR_HOTPLUG menu.
- Dropped the global-operation coalescing optimization.
- Dropped provider handling for SMCCC_RET_NOT_REQUIRED.
- Removed the unnecessary global provider pointer.
- Removed arm64_ prefixes from static provider-local names.
- Documented why these SMCCC Arch cache maintenance calls use SMC64.
- Anchored the SMCCC return-code comment to DEN0028 v1.7.
- Used fsleep() for retry backoff.
- Used unsigned long for retry delay values passed to fsleep().
- Skipped the final backoff sleep when no retry remains.
- Documented the bounded mutex hold time across the serialized retry
  sequence.
- Added mutex_destroy() on the registration failure path.

Srirangan Madhavan (2):
  arm64: smccc: add cache clean/invalidate IDs and return codes
  cache: add SMCCC-backed cache invalidate provider

 drivers/cache/Kconfig           |  11 +++
 drivers/cache/Makefile          |   2 +
 drivers/cache/arm_smccc_cache.c | 157 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/linux/arm-smccc.h       |  21 ++++-
 tools/include/linux/arm-smccc.h |  21 ++++-
 5 files changed, 208 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 drivers/cache/arm_smccc_cache.c


base-commit: 3b3bea6d4b9c162f9e555905d96b8c1da67ecd5b
-- 
2.43.0


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 1/2] arm64: smccc: add cache clean/invalidate IDs and return codes
  2026-06-08 22:07 [PATCH v2 0/2] Add SMCCC cache clean/invalidate provider Srirangan Madhavan
@ 2026-06-08 22:07 ` Srirangan Madhavan
  2026-06-08 22:07 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] cache: add SMCCC-backed cache invalidate provider Srirangan Madhavan
  2026-06-23 23:37 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] Add SMCCC cache clean/invalidate provider Srirangan Madhavan
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Srirangan Madhavan @ 2026-06-08 22:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mark Rutland, Lorenzo Pieralisi, Sudeep Holla, Conor Dooley,
	Jonathan Cameron
  Cc: Catalin Marinas, Will Deacon, Dan Williams, Thierry Reding,
	Jonathan Hunter, Souvik Chakravarty, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-kernel, linux-tegra, Srirangan Madhavan

Define SMCCC Arch function IDs for CLEAN_INV_MEMREGION and its ATTRIBUTES
call, and add RATE_LIMITED/BUSY return codes from DEN0028 for callers that
need transient error handling.

Signed-off-by: Srirangan Madhavan <smadhavan@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
---
 include/linux/arm-smccc.h       | 21 +++++++++++++++++++--
 tools/include/linux/arm-smccc.h | 21 +++++++++++++++++++--
 2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/arm-smccc.h b/include/linux/arm-smccc.h
index 50b47eba7d01..8cba040e0816 100644
--- a/include/linux/arm-smccc.h
+++ b/include/linux/arm-smccc.h
@@ -105,6 +105,22 @@
 			   ARM_SMCCC_SMC_32,				\
 			   0, 0x3fff)
 
+/*
+ * DEN0028 v1.7 defines these cache maintenance functions as SMC64
+ * because they carry 64-bit memory range arguments.
+ */
+#define ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_CLEAN_INV_MEMREGION				\
+	ARM_SMCCC_CALL_VAL(ARM_SMCCC_FAST_CALL,				\
+			   ARM_SMCCC_SMC_64,				\
+			   ARM_SMCCC_OWNER_ARCH,			\
+			   0x5)
+
+#define ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_CLEAN_INV_MEMREGION_ATTRIBUTES			\
+	ARM_SMCCC_CALL_VAL(ARM_SMCCC_FAST_CALL,				\
+			   ARM_SMCCC_SMC_64,				\
+			   ARM_SMCCC_OWNER_ARCH,			\
+			   0x6)
+
 #define ARM_SMCCC_VENDOR_HYP_CALL_UID_FUNC_ID				\
 	ARM_SMCCC_CALL_VAL(ARM_SMCCC_FAST_CALL,				\
 			   ARM_SMCCC_SMC_32,				\
@@ -294,13 +310,14 @@
 			   0x53)
 
 /*
- * Return codes defined in ARM DEN 0070A
- * ARM DEN 0070A is now merged/consolidated into ARM DEN 0028 C
+ * Return codes defined by Arm SMCCC (DEN0028 v1.7).
  */
 #define SMCCC_RET_SUCCESS			0
 #define SMCCC_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED			-1
 #define SMCCC_RET_NOT_REQUIRED			-2
 #define SMCCC_RET_INVALID_PARAMETER		-3
+#define SMCCC_RET_RATE_LIMITED			-4
+#define SMCCC_RET_BUSY				-5
 
 #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__
 
diff --git a/tools/include/linux/arm-smccc.h b/tools/include/linux/arm-smccc.h
index 63ce9bebccd3..ae5637b3240f 100644
--- a/tools/include/linux/arm-smccc.h
+++ b/tools/include/linux/arm-smccc.h
@@ -96,6 +96,22 @@
 			   ARM_SMCCC_SMC_32,				\
 			   0, 0x3fff)
 
+/*
+ * DEN0028 v1.7 defines these cache maintenance functions as SMC64
+ * because they carry 64-bit memory range arguments.
+ */
+#define ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_CLEAN_INV_MEMREGION				\
+	ARM_SMCCC_CALL_VAL(ARM_SMCCC_FAST_CALL,				\
+			   ARM_SMCCC_SMC_64,				\
+			   ARM_SMCCC_OWNER_ARCH,			\
+			   0x5)
+
+#define ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_CLEAN_INV_MEMREGION_ATTRIBUTES			\
+	ARM_SMCCC_CALL_VAL(ARM_SMCCC_FAST_CALL,				\
+			   ARM_SMCCC_SMC_64,				\
+			   ARM_SMCCC_OWNER_ARCH,			\
+			   0x6)
+
 #define ARM_SMCCC_VENDOR_HYP_CALL_UID_FUNC_ID				\
 	ARM_SMCCC_CALL_VAL(ARM_SMCCC_FAST_CALL,				\
 			   ARM_SMCCC_SMC_32,				\
@@ -182,12 +198,13 @@
 			   0x53)
 
 /*
- * Return codes defined in ARM DEN 0070A
- * ARM DEN 0070A is now merged/consolidated into ARM DEN 0028 C
+ * Return codes defined by Arm SMCCC (DEN0028 v1.7).
  */
 #define SMCCC_RET_SUCCESS			0
 #define SMCCC_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED			-1
 #define SMCCC_RET_NOT_REQUIRED			-2
 #define SMCCC_RET_INVALID_PARAMETER		-3
+#define SMCCC_RET_RATE_LIMITED			-4
+#define SMCCC_RET_BUSY				-5
 
 #endif /*__LINUX_ARM_SMCCC_H*/
-- 
2.43.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* [PATCH v2 2/2] cache: add SMCCC-backed cache invalidate provider
  2026-06-08 22:07 [PATCH v2 0/2] Add SMCCC cache clean/invalidate provider Srirangan Madhavan
  2026-06-08 22:07 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] arm64: smccc: add cache clean/invalidate IDs and return codes Srirangan Madhavan
@ 2026-06-08 22:07 ` Srirangan Madhavan
  2026-07-02 13:04   ` Bence Csókás
  2026-06-23 23:37 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] Add SMCCC cache clean/invalidate provider Srirangan Madhavan
  2 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Srirangan Madhavan @ 2026-06-08 22:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mark Rutland, Lorenzo Pieralisi, Sudeep Holla, Conor Dooley,
	Jonathan Cameron
  Cc: Catalin Marinas, Will Deacon, Dan Williams, Thierry Reding,
	Jonathan Hunter, Souvik Chakravarty, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-kernel, linux-tegra, Srirangan Madhavan

Add a cache maintenance provider for the Arm SMCCC cache clean+invalidate
interface.

The provider discovers SMCCC support and attributes at init time,
serializes firmware calls, handles transient BUSY and RATE_LIMITED
responses with bounded retries, and registers with the generic cache
coherency framework used by memregion callers.

Signed-off-by: Srirangan Madhavan <smadhavan@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/cache/Kconfig           |  11 +++
 drivers/cache/Makefile          |   2 +
 drivers/cache/arm_smccc_cache.c | 157 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 170 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 drivers/cache/arm_smccc_cache.c

diff --git a/drivers/cache/Kconfig b/drivers/cache/Kconfig
index 1518449d47b5..57fd1823dec5 100644
--- a/drivers/cache/Kconfig
+++ b/drivers/cache/Kconfig
@@ -42,6 +42,17 @@ menuconfig CACHEMAINT_FOR_HOTPLUG
 
 if CACHEMAINT_FOR_HOTPLUG
 
+config ARM_SMCCC_CACHE
+	bool "Arm SMCCC cache maintenance provider"
+	depends on ARM64 && HAVE_ARM_SMCCC_DISCOVERY
+	help
+	  Enable support for the Arm SMCCC cache clean+invalidate
+	  interface as a provider for memory hotplug-like cache
+	  maintenance operations.
+	  The provider registers only when firmware advertises the
+	  SMCCC calls and attributes, so systems without firmware support
+	  continue without this registered provider.
+
 config HISI_SOC_HHA
 	tristate "HiSilicon Hydra Home Agent (HHA) device driver"
 	depends on (ARM64 && ACPI) || COMPILE_TEST
diff --git a/drivers/cache/Makefile b/drivers/cache/Makefile
index b3362b15d6c1..55736a032d6f 100644
--- a/drivers/cache/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/cache/Makefile
@@ -4,4 +4,6 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_AX45MP_L2_CACHE)		+= ax45mp_cache.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_SIFIVE_CCACHE)		+= sifive_ccache.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_STARFIVE_STARLINK_CACHE)	+= starfive_starlink_cache.o
 
+# Providers below depend on CACHEMAINT_FOR_HOTPLUG.
+obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_SMCCC_CACHE)		+= arm_smccc_cache.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_HISI_SOC_HHA)		+= hisi_soc_hha.o
diff --git a/drivers/cache/arm_smccc_cache.c b/drivers/cache/arm_smccc_cache.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..82b9efdb190b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/cache/arm_smccc_cache.c
@@ -0,0 +1,157 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+/*
+ * Copyright (C) 2026 NVIDIA Corporation
+ *
+ * Arm SMCCC cache maintenance provider using cache clean+invalidate calls.
+ */
+
+#include <linux/arm-smccc.h>
+#include <linux/cache_coherency.h>
+#include <linux/cleanup.h>
+#include <linux/delay.h>
+#include <linux/errno.h>
+#include <linux/init.h>
+#include <linux/kernel.h>
+#include <linux/mutex.h>
+#include <linux/nmi.h>
+
+#define SMCCC_CACHE_MAX_RETRIES		5
+#define SMCCC_CACHE_DEFAULT_DELAY_US	1000UL
+#define SMCCC_CACHE_MAX_DELAY_US	20000UL
+
+struct smccc_cache {
+	/* Must be first member */
+	struct cache_coherency_ops_inst cci;
+	struct mutex lock; /* Serializes SMCCC cache maintenance calls. */
+	u32 latency_us;
+	u32 rate_limit;
+};
+
+static int smccc_cache_status_to_errno(s32 status)
+{
+	switch (status) {
+	case SMCCC_RET_SUCCESS:
+		return 0;
+	case SMCCC_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED:
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+	case SMCCC_RET_INVALID_PARAMETER:
+		return -EINVAL;
+	case SMCCC_RET_RATE_LIMITED:
+		return -EAGAIN;
+	case SMCCC_RET_BUSY:
+		return -EBUSY;
+	default:
+		return -EIO;
+	}
+}
+
+static unsigned long smccc_cache_delay_us(const struct smccc_cache *cache)
+{
+	unsigned long delay_us = 0;
+
+	if (cache->rate_limit)
+		delay_us = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(USEC_PER_SEC, cache->rate_limit);
+
+	if (cache->latency_us)
+		delay_us = max(delay_us, (unsigned long)cache->latency_us);
+
+	/*
+	 * Firmware may advertise neither a rate limit nor a latency hint; use
+	 * a small bounded backoff instead of retrying in a tight loop.
+	 */
+	if (!delay_us)
+		delay_us = SMCCC_CACHE_DEFAULT_DELAY_US;
+
+	return min(delay_us, SMCCC_CACHE_MAX_DELAY_US);
+}
+
+static int smccc_cache_wbinv(struct cache_coherency_ops_inst *cci,
+			     struct cc_inval_params *invp)
+{
+	struct smccc_cache *cache = container_of(cci, struct smccc_cache, cci);
+	struct arm_smccc_res res = {};
+	unsigned long delay_us = smccc_cache_delay_us(cache);
+	int ret;
+
+	if (!invp->size)
+		return -EINVAL;
+
+	/*
+	 * Serialize the full retry sequence. With the default bounds, a caller
+	 * may hold the mutex across up to five 20ms backoff sleeps.
+	 */
+	guard(mutex)(&cache->lock);
+
+	for (unsigned int i = 0; i < SMCCC_CACHE_MAX_RETRIES; i++) {
+		/* Long firmware operations can trigger watchdog checks. */
+		touch_nmi_watchdog();
+
+		arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_CLEAN_INV_MEMREGION,
+				     invp->addr, invp->size, 0UL, &res);
+
+		ret = smccc_cache_status_to_errno((s32)res.a0);
+		if (!ret)
+			return 0;
+
+		if (ret != -EBUSY && ret != -EAGAIN)
+			return ret;
+
+		fsleep(delay_us);
+	}
+
+	return -EBUSY;
+}
+
+static const struct cache_coherency_ops smccc_cache_ops = {
+	.wbinv = smccc_cache_wbinv,
+};
+
+static int __init smccc_cache_init(void)
+{
+	struct smccc_cache *cache;
+	struct arm_smccc_res res = {};
+	int ret;
+
+	if (arm_smccc_get_version() < ARM_SMCCC_VERSION_1_1)
+		return -ENODEV;
+
+	if (arm_smccc_1_1_get_conduit() == SMCCC_CONDUIT_NONE)
+		return -ENODEV;
+
+	arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID,
+			     ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_CLEAN_INV_MEMREGION, &res);
+	if ((s32)res.a0 < 0)
+		return -ENODEV;
+
+	arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID,
+			     ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_CLEAN_INV_MEMREGION_ATTRIBUTES,
+			     &res);
+	if ((s32)res.a0 < 0)
+		return -ENODEV;
+
+	arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_CLEAN_INV_MEMREGION_ATTRIBUTES,
+			     &res);
+	if ((s32)res.a0)
+		return -ENODEV;
+
+	cache = cache_coherency_ops_instance_alloc(&smccc_cache_ops,
+						   struct smccc_cache, cci);
+	if (!cache)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
+	mutex_init(&cache->lock);
+	cache->latency_us = lower_32_bits(res.a2);
+	cache->rate_limit = lower_32_bits(res.a3);
+
+	ret = cache_coherency_ops_instance_register(&cache->cci);
+	if (ret) {
+		mutex_destroy(&cache->lock);
+		cache_coherency_ops_instance_put(&cache->cci);
+		return ret;
+	}
+
+	pr_info("SMCCC cache clean+invalidate provider registered\n");
+
+	return 0;
+}
+arch_initcall(smccc_cache_init);
-- 
2.43.0


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] Add SMCCC cache clean/invalidate provider
  2026-06-08 22:07 [PATCH v2 0/2] Add SMCCC cache clean/invalidate provider Srirangan Madhavan
  2026-06-08 22:07 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] arm64: smccc: add cache clean/invalidate IDs and return codes Srirangan Madhavan
  2026-06-08 22:07 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] cache: add SMCCC-backed cache invalidate provider Srirangan Madhavan
@ 2026-06-23 23:37 ` Srirangan Madhavan
  2 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Srirangan Madhavan @ 2026-06-23 23:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Mark Rutland, Lorenzo Pieralisi, Sudeep Holla, Conor Dooley,
	Jonathan Cameron
  Cc: Catalin Marinas, Will Deacon, Dan Williams, Thierry Reding,
	Jon Hunter, Vikram Sethi, Souvik Chakravarty,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org

Hi all,

  Gentle ping on this v2.

  This version includes Jonathan's Reviewed-by tags and addresses the v1
  comments around the Kconfig wording, Makefile ordering/comment, and retry
  loop handling.

  The main open question from v1 was whether DEN0028 v1.7 BET0 is sufficient
  for merging these SMCCC cache maintenance definitions/provider. Could one
  of the Arm/SMCCC maintainers please confirm whether this is acceptable for
  merge, or whether the series should wait for a non-beta spec revision?

  If the spec status is acceptable, please let me know if there are any
  remaining concerns with v2.

  Thanks,
  Srirangan

________________________________________
From: Srirangan Madhavan
Sent: Monday, June 8, 2026 3:07 PM
To: Mark Rutland; Lorenzo Pieralisi; Sudeep Holla; Conor Dooley; Jonathan Cameron
Cc: Catalin Marinas; Will Deacon; Dan Williams; Thierry Reding; Jon Hunter; Souvik Chakravarty; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org; Srirangan Madhavan
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/2] Add SMCCC cache clean/invalidate provider

This series adds an arm64 backend for memregion cache invalidation users
based on the Arm SMCCC cache clean+invalidate interface.

Per DEN0028, this interface targets systems where a Normal Cacheable
memory region can be modified in ways that are not handled by usual PE
coherency mechanisms, and where VA-based CMOs may be too slow or
insufficient for large ranges and/or system-cache implementations.

Representative use cases include device-backed memory state transitions
where stale CPU/system cache lines must be invalidated reliably (for
example secure erase, reset/offline flows, and dynamic memory
reconfiguration).

Patch 1 introduces the Arm SMCCC cache clean/invalidate function IDs and
transient return codes needed by callers [1].

Patch 2 adds a cache maintenance provider that:
- discovers SMCCC support and attributes at init time
- registers with the generic cache coherency framework used by
  cpu_cache_invalidate_memregion()
- handles transient BUSY/RATE_LIMITED responses with bounded retries

This patch set does not add a software fallback path; when firmware does
not implement the SMCCC cache maintenance interface, the provider is not
registered and existing behavior is preserved.

Reference:
[1] https://developer.arm.com/documentation/den0028/latest

Note: Jonathan Cameron raised whether DEN0028 v1.7 BET0 is sufficient
for merge. Input from Arm maintainers / SMCCC spec owners on that point
would be appreciated.

Changes since v1:
- Added Jonathan Cameron's Reviewed-by tags.
- Clarified the ARM_SMCCC_CACHE Kconfig help text.
- Added a Makefile comment identifying the providers that depend on
  CACHEMAINT_FOR_HOTPLUG.
- Dropped the final-backoff-sleep skip in the retry loop.

Changes since RFC:
- Dropped the RFC tag.
- Moved the provider from arch/arm64/mm to drivers/cache.
- Added a dedicated CONFIG_ARM_SMCCC_CACHE option under the existing
  CACHEMAINT_FOR_HOTPLUG menu.
- Dropped the global-operation coalescing optimization.
- Dropped provider handling for SMCCC_RET_NOT_REQUIRED.
- Removed the unnecessary global provider pointer.
- Removed arm64_ prefixes from static provider-local names.
- Documented why these SMCCC Arch cache maintenance calls use SMC64.
- Anchored the SMCCC return-code comment to DEN0028 v1.7.
- Used fsleep() for retry backoff.
- Used unsigned long for retry delay values passed to fsleep().
- Skipped the final backoff sleep when no retry remains.
- Documented the bounded mutex hold time across the serialized retry
  sequence.
- Added mutex_destroy() on the registration failure path.

Srirangan Madhavan (2):
  arm64: smccc: add cache clean/invalidate IDs and return codes
  cache: add SMCCC-backed cache invalidate provider

 drivers/cache/Kconfig           |  11 +++
 drivers/cache/Makefile          |   2 +
 drivers/cache/arm_smccc_cache.c | 157 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 include/linux/arm-smccc.h       |  21 ++++-
 tools/include/linux/arm-smccc.h |  21 ++++-
 5 files changed, 208 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
 create mode 100644 drivers/cache/arm_smccc_cache.c


base-commit: 3b3bea6d4b9c162f9e555905d96b8c1da67ecd5b
--
2.43.0


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] cache: add SMCCC-backed cache invalidate provider
  2026-06-08 22:07 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] cache: add SMCCC-backed cache invalidate provider Srirangan Madhavan
@ 2026-07-02 13:04   ` Bence Csókás
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Bence Csókás @ 2026-07-02 13:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Srirangan Madhavan, Mark Rutland, Lorenzo Pieralisi, Sudeep Holla,
	Conor Dooley, Jonathan Cameron
  Cc: Catalin Marinas, Will Deacon, Dan Williams, Thierry Reding,
	Jonathan Hunter, Souvik Chakravarty, linux-arm-kernel,
	linux-kernel, linux-tegra

Hi,

I'm reading the 1.7 H BET0 [1] version of the spec (released 
2026-04-20), and I see some discrepancies. Not sure if I'm the one 
reading it wrong, or if you had a different version than me.

[1] https://developer.arm.com/documentation/den0028/h/?lang=en

Either way, thanks for posting this patch, I'm also looking forward to 
seeing it get merged!

On 2026. 06. 09. 0:07, Srirangan Madhavan wrote:
> Add a cache maintenance provider for the Arm SMCCC cache clean+invalidate
> interface.
> 
> The provider discovers SMCCC support and attributes at init time,
> serializes firmware calls, handles transient BUSY and RATE_LIMITED
> responses with bounded retries, and registers with the generic cache
> coherency framework used by memregion callers.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Srirangan Madhavan <smadhavan@nvidia.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>
> ---
>   drivers/cache/Kconfig           |  11 +++
>   drivers/cache/Makefile          |   2 +
>   drivers/cache/arm_smccc_cache.c | 157 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   3 files changed, 170 insertions(+)
>   create mode 100644 drivers/cache/arm_smccc_cache.c
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cache/Kconfig b/drivers/cache/Kconfig
> index 1518449d47b5..57fd1823dec5 100644
> --- a/drivers/cache/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/cache/Kconfig
> @@ -42,6 +42,17 @@ menuconfig CACHEMAINT_FOR_HOTPLUG
>   
>   if CACHEMAINT_FOR_HOTPLUG
>   
> +config ARM_SMCCC_CACHE
> +	bool "Arm SMCCC cache maintenance provider"
> +	depends on ARM64 && HAVE_ARM_SMCCC_DISCOVERY
> +	help
> +	  Enable support for the Arm SMCCC cache clean+invalidate
> +	  interface as a provider for memory hotplug-like cache
> +	  maintenance operations.
> +	  The provider registers only when firmware advertises the
> +	  SMCCC calls and attributes, so systems without firmware support
> +	  continue without this registered provider.
> +
>   config HISI_SOC_HHA
>   	tristate "HiSilicon Hydra Home Agent (HHA) device driver"
>   	depends on (ARM64 && ACPI) || COMPILE_TEST
> diff --git a/drivers/cache/Makefile b/drivers/cache/Makefile
> index b3362b15d6c1..55736a032d6f 100644
> --- a/drivers/cache/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/cache/Makefile
> @@ -4,4 +4,6 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_AX45MP_L2_CACHE)		+= ax45mp_cache.o
>   obj-$(CONFIG_SIFIVE_CCACHE)		+= sifive_ccache.o
>   obj-$(CONFIG_STARFIVE_STARLINK_CACHE)	+= starfive_starlink_cache.o
>   
> +# Providers below depend on CACHEMAINT_FOR_HOTPLUG.
> +obj-$(CONFIG_ARM_SMCCC_CACHE)		+= arm_smccc_cache.o
>   obj-$(CONFIG_HISI_SOC_HHA)		+= hisi_soc_hha.o
> diff --git a/drivers/cache/arm_smccc_cache.c b/drivers/cache/arm_smccc_cache.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..82b9efdb190b
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/cache/arm_smccc_cache.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,157 @@
> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> +/*
> + * Copyright (C) 2026 NVIDIA Corporation
> + *
> + * Arm SMCCC cache maintenance provider using cache clean+invalidate calls.
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/arm-smccc.h>
> +#include <linux/cache_coherency.h>
> +#include <linux/cleanup.h>
> +#include <linux/delay.h>
> +#include <linux/errno.h>
> +#include <linux/init.h>
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +#include <linux/mutex.h>
> +#include <linux/nmi.h>
> +
> +#define SMCCC_CACHE_MAX_RETRIES		5

Indentation seems off here.

> +#define SMCCC_CACHE_DEFAULT_DELAY_US	1000UL
> +#define SMCCC_CACHE_MAX_DELAY_US	20000UL
> +
> +struct smccc_cache {
> +	/* Must be first member */
> +	struct cache_coherency_ops_inst cci;
> +	struct mutex lock; /* Serializes SMCCC cache maintenance calls. */
> +	u32 latency_us;
> +	u32 rate_limit;
> +};
> +
> +static int smccc_cache_status_to_errno(s32 status)

I could see this being useful in the common smccc.c, not just here.

> +{
> +	switch (status) {
> +	case SMCCC_RET_SUCCESS:
> +		return 0;
> +	case SMCCC_RET_NOT_SUPPORTED:
> +		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> +	case SMCCC_RET_INVALID_PARAMETER:
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +	case SMCCC_RET_RATE_LIMITED:
> +		return -EAGAIN;
> +	case SMCCC_RET_BUSY:
> +		return -EBUSY;
> +	default:
> +		return -EIO;
> +	}
> +}
> +
> +static unsigned long smccc_cache_delay_us(const struct smccc_cache *cache)
> +{
> +	unsigned long delay_us = 0;
> +
> +	if (cache->rate_limit)
> +		delay_us = DIV_ROUND_UP_ULL(USEC_PER_SEC, cache->rate_limit);
> +
> +	if (cache->latency_us)
> +		delay_us = max(delay_us, (unsigned long)cache->latency_us);
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Firmware may advertise neither a rate limit nor a latency hint; use
> +	 * a small bounded backoff instead of retrying in a tight loop.
> +	 */
> +	if (!delay_us)
> +		delay_us = SMCCC_CACHE_DEFAULT_DELAY_US;
> +
> +	return min(delay_us, SMCCC_CACHE_MAX_DELAY_US);
> +}
> +
> +static int smccc_cache_wbinv(struct cache_coherency_ops_inst *cci,
> +			     struct cc_inval_params *invp)
> +{
> +	struct smccc_cache *cache = container_of(cci, struct smccc_cache, cci);
> +	struct arm_smccc_res res = {};

I would move this down one, for aesthetics (reverse fir tree).

> +	unsigned long delay_us = smccc_cache_delay_us(cache);
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	if (!invp->size)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Serialize the full retry sequence. With the default bounds, a caller
> +	 * may hold the mutex across up to five 20ms backoff sleeps.
> +	 */
> +	guard(mutex)(&cache->lock);
> +
> +	for (unsigned int i = 0; i < SMCCC_CACHE_MAX_RETRIES; i++) {
> +		/* Long firmware operations can trigger watchdog checks. */
> +		touch_nmi_watchdog();
> +
> +		arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_CLEAN_INV_MEMREGION,
> +				     invp->addr, invp->size, 0UL, &res);
> +
> +		ret = smccc_cache_status_to_errno((s32)res.a0);
> +		if (!ret)
> +			return 0;
> +
> +		if (ret != -EBUSY && ret != -EAGAIN)
> +			return ret;
> +
> +		fsleep(delay_us);
> +	}
> +
> +	return -EBUSY;

Minor: I would do `return ret;` so that we get the last error message, 
which could be either EBUSY or EAGAIN (depending on if FW responded BUSY 
or RATE_LIMITED).

> +}
> +
> +static const struct cache_coherency_ops smccc_cache_ops = {
> +	.wbinv = smccc_cache_wbinv,
> +};
> +
> +static int __init smccc_cache_init(void)
> +{
> +	struct smccc_cache *cache;

Again, I would move this line down one.

> +	struct arm_smccc_res res = {};
> +	int ret;
> +
> +	if (arm_smccc_get_version() < ARM_SMCCC_VERSION_1_1)
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
> +	if (arm_smccc_1_1_get_conduit() == SMCCC_CONDUIT_NONE)
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
> +	arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID,
> +			     ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_CLEAN_INV_MEMREGION, &res);
> +	if ((s32)res.a0 < 0)
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
> +	arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_FEATURES_FUNC_ID,
> +			     ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_CLEAN_INV_MEMREGION_ATTRIBUTES,
> +			     &res);
> +	if ((s32)res.a0 < 0)
> +		return -ENODEV;

7.11.2 states (top of page 47):
   This function must be implemented if SMCCC_ARCH_CLEAN_INV_MEMREGION 
is implemented.

Therefore, this check can be dropped, just checking for INV_MEMREGION's 
existence should be enough.

> +	arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(ARM_SMCCC_ARCH_CLEAN_INV_MEMREGION_ATTRIBUTES,
> +			     &res);
> +	if ((s32)res.a0)
> +		return -ENODEV;
> +
> +	cache = cache_coherency_ops_instance_alloc(&smccc_cache_ops,
> +						   struct smccc_cache, cci);
> +	if (!cache)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	mutex_init(&cache->lock);
> +	cache->latency_us = lower_32_bits(res.a2);
> +	cache->rate_limit = lower_32_bits(res.a3);

The spec only says to truncate X2 to 32 bits, not X3 (chapter 7.11, page 
46).

> +	ret = cache_coherency_ops_instance_register(&cache->cci);
> +	if (ret) {
> +		mutex_destroy(&cache->lock);
> +		cache_coherency_ops_instance_put(&cache->cci);
> +		return ret;
> +	}
> +
> +	pr_info("SMCCC cache clean+invalidate provider registered\n");

Is this log line useful for _production_ environments?

> +	return 0;
> +}
> +arch_initcall(smccc_cache_init);

Bence


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2026-07-02 13:05 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-06-08 22:07 [PATCH v2 0/2] Add SMCCC cache clean/invalidate provider Srirangan Madhavan
2026-06-08 22:07 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] arm64: smccc: add cache clean/invalidate IDs and return codes Srirangan Madhavan
2026-06-08 22:07 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] cache: add SMCCC-backed cache invalidate provider Srirangan Madhavan
2026-07-02 13:04   ` Bence Csókás
2026-06-23 23:37 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] Add SMCCC cache clean/invalidate provider Srirangan Madhavan

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox