From: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>
To: "André Draszik" <andre.draszik@linaro.org>,
"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk@kernel.org>,
"Alim Akhtar" <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Conor Dooley" <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
"Ulf Hansson" <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Cc: Peter Griffin <peter.griffin@linaro.org>,
Tudor Ambarus <tudor.ambarus@linaro.org>,
Will McVicker <willmcvicker@google.com>,
kernel-team@android.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 06/10] pmdomain: samsung: convert to regmap_read_poll_timeout()
Date: Wed, 22 Oct 2025 15:45:07 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5c19e4ef-c4fd-4bf5-88b3-46c86751b14e@samsung.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2e38e6c2-0548-432f-ae34-daf3972877ac@samsung.com>
On 21.10.2025 22:38, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> On 16.10.2025 17:58, André Draszik wrote:
>> Replace the open-coded PD status polling with
>> regmap_read_poll_timeout(). This change simplifies the code without
>> altering functionality.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: André Draszik <andre.draszik@linaro.org>
>> ---
>> drivers/pmdomain/samsung/exynos-pm-domains.c | 29
>> ++++++++--------------------
>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/pmdomain/samsung/exynos-pm-domains.c
>> b/drivers/pmdomain/samsung/exynos-pm-domains.c
>> index
>> 383126245811cb8e4dbae3b99ced3f06d3093f35..431548ad9a7e40c0a77ac6672081b600c90ddd4e
>> 100644
>> --- a/drivers/pmdomain/samsung/exynos-pm-domains.c
>> +++ b/drivers/pmdomain/samsung/exynos-pm-domains.c
>> @@ -13,7 +13,6 @@
>> #include <linux/platform_device.h>
>> #include <linux/slab.h>
>> #include <linux/pm_domain.h>
>> -#include <linux/delay.h>
>> #include <linux/of.h>
>> #include <linux/pm_runtime.h>
>> #include <linux/regmap.h>
>> @@ -35,7 +34,8 @@ struct exynos_pm_domain {
>> static int exynos_pd_power(struct generic_pm_domain *domain, bool
>> power_on)
>> {
>> struct exynos_pm_domain *pd;
>> - u32 timeout, pwr;
>> + unsigned int val;
>> + u32 pwr;
>> int err;
>> pd = container_of(domain, struct exynos_pm_domain, pd);
>> @@ -45,25 +45,12 @@ static int exynos_pd_power(struct
>> generic_pm_domain *domain, bool power_on)
>> if (err)
>> return err;
>> - /* Wait max 1ms */
>> - timeout = 10;
>> - while (timeout-- > 0) {
>> - unsigned int val;
>> -
>> - err = regmap_read(pd->regmap, 0x4, &val);
>> - if (err || ((val & pd->local_pwr_cfg) != pwr)) {
>> - cpu_relax();
>> - usleep_range(80, 100);
>> - continue;
>> - }
>> -
>> - return 0;
>> - }
>> -
>> - if (!err)
>> - err = -ETIMEDOUT;
>> - pr_err("Power domain %s %sable failed: %d\n", domain->name,
>> - power_on ? "en" : "dis", err);
>> + err = regmap_read_poll_timeout(pd->regmap, 0x4, val,
>> + (val & pd->local_pwr_cfg) == pwr,
>> + 100, 1 * USEC_PER_MSEC);
>> + if (err)
>> + pr_err("Power domain %s %sable failed: %d (%#.2x)\n",
>> + domain->name, power_on ? "en" : "dis", err, val);
>
> I've posted my 'tested-by' tag for this patchset, but in meantime I
> found that this patch causes regression from time to time on old
> Exynos SoCs (especially when all debugs are disabled). It looks that
> there are some subtle differences between reading the status register
> up to 10 times with cpu_relax()+usleep_range() and the
> regmap_read_poll_timeout(). I will try to analyze this a bit more and
> provide details, but I suspect that the old loop might take a bit
> longer than the 1ms from the comment above this code.
It looks that during the early boot all calls to
regmap_read_poll_timeout() lasts exactly 10ms (measured with ktime_get()
and ktime_to_ms()), what means that timekeeping source doesn't provide
resolution high enough for the 1ms timeout. This in turn results in
premature end of regmap_read_poll_timeout() loop after only one cycle of
read+wait+read, what is not always enough for power domain to turn on/off.
According to the commit 7349a69cf312 ("iopoll: Do not use timekeeping in
read_poll_timeout_atomic()"), ktime_get(), which is used also by
regmap_read_poll_timeout(), is not reliable in all contexts, so I think
that this patch should be dropped as there is no easy way to fix this.
The alternative would be to use regmap_read_poll_timeout_atomic(), which
need to be fixed the same way as regmap_read_poll_timeout_atomic() by
the mentioned commit, but in such case we would effectively switch from
usleep to udelay.
Best regards
--
Marek Szyprowski, PhD
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-22 13:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20251016155848eucas1p193debe70e38b1694bfb250d748f4aa14@eucas1p1.samsung.com>
2025-10-16 15:58 ` [PATCH v3 00/10] pmdomain: samsung: add supoort for Google GS101 André Draszik
2025-10-16 15:58 ` [PATCH v3 01/10] dt-bindings: power: samsung: add google,gs101-pd André Draszik
2025-10-22 6:31 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-10-16 15:58 ` [PATCH v3 02/10] dt-bindings: soc: samsung: exynos-pmu: move gs101-pmu into separate binding André Draszik
2025-10-22 6:34 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-10-22 6:36 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-10-16 15:58 ` [PATCH v3 03/10] dt-bindings: soc: samsung: gs101-pmu: allow power domains as children André Draszik
2025-10-21 12:59 ` Ulf Hansson
2025-10-21 16:18 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-10-22 10:03 ` Ulf Hansson
2025-10-22 6:39 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-10-16 15:58 ` [PATCH v3 04/10] pmdomain: samsung: plug potential memleak during probe André Draszik
2025-10-21 13:54 ` Ulf Hansson
2025-10-16 15:58 ` [PATCH v3 05/10] pmdomain: samsung: convert to using regmap André Draszik
2025-10-16 15:58 ` [PATCH v3 06/10] pmdomain: samsung: convert to regmap_read_poll_timeout() André Draszik
2025-10-21 20:38 ` Marek Szyprowski
2025-10-22 13:45 ` Marek Szyprowski [this message]
2025-10-16 15:58 ` [PATCH v3 07/10] pmdomain: samsung: don't hardcode offset for registers to 0 and 4 André Draszik
2025-10-16 15:58 ` [PATCH v3 08/10] pmdomain: samsung: selectively handle enforced sync_state André Draszik
2025-10-22 11:06 ` Ulf Hansson
2025-10-22 18:39 ` Marek Szyprowski
2025-10-23 10:02 ` Ulf Hansson
2025-10-23 12:17 ` Marek Szyprowski
2025-10-23 13:46 ` Ulf Hansson
2025-10-16 15:58 ` [PATCH v3 09/10] pmdomain: samsung: add support for google,gs101-pd André Draszik
2025-10-16 15:58 ` [PATCH v3 10/10] pmdomain: samsung: use dev_err() instead of pr_err() André Draszik
2025-10-17 6:43 ` [PATCH v3 00/10] pmdomain: samsung: add supoort for Google GS101 Marek Szyprowski
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5c19e4ef-c4fd-4bf5-88b3-46c86751b14e@samsung.com \
--to=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
--cc=andre.draszik@linaro.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kernel-team@android.com \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-samsung-soc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peter.griffin@linaro.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=tudor.ambarus@linaro.org \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
--cc=willmcvicker@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox