From: arnd@arndb.de (Arnd Bergmann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCHv2 1/3] net: phy: prevent linking breakage
Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2013 17:07:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6466898.RnYOe3jpGG@wuerfel> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20130530.024201.1913984663902628192.davem@davemloft.net>
On Thursday 30 May 2013 02:42:01 David Miller wrote:
> From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@free-electrons.com>
> > On 28/05/2013 22:09, David Miller wrote:
> > But that is making it impossible to compile a kernel without any network
> > stack for those platforms or we are going back to either enclosing the
> > calls to phy_register_fixup{,_for_uid,_for_id} with #ifdef CONFIG_PHYLIB
> > or if(IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_PHYLIB)). And as you can see, it is quite error
> > prone and is done only done for 2 platforms on a total of 6. I believe
> > fixing that in phy.h is more foolproof.
>
> Or you properly segregate the networking bits of the platform code so
> that it can be built only when the necessary networking portions are
> enabled.
>
> Sometimes having dummy stubs makes sense, but not in this situation.
Currently most users of this function are doing something like
static int foo_phy_fixup(struct phy_device *phydev)
{
...
}
static int __init boo_board_init(void)
{
if (IS_BUILTIN(CONFIG_PHYLIB))
phy_register_fixup_for_uid(phy_id, foo_phy_fixup);
}
which is practically the same as having a dummy stub. It leads to
the foo_phy_fixup() function always getting compiled and then discarded
by gcc when CONFIG_PHYLIB is disabled.
The method is currently broken when network drivers are enabled as
modules, because we are missing the fixup then.
I think we should use IS_ENABLED() here to force a build error
in that case, and have something like
config ARCH_FOO
bool "support for the foo platform"
select PHYLIB if NET
in the platform Kconfig file, to ensure PHYLIB is always built-in.
I still think the inline alternatives would be helpful, but using
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PHYLIB)) in the platform code would also
work.
Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-06-04 15:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-05-28 11:43 [PATCHv2 0/3] net: phy: prevent linking breakage Alexandre Belloni
2013-05-28 11:43 ` [PATCHv2 1/3] " Alexandre Belloni
2013-05-28 20:09 ` David Miller
2013-05-29 8:21 ` Alexandre Belloni
2013-05-30 9:42 ` David Miller
2013-06-04 15:07 ` Arnd Bergmann [this message]
2013-06-04 15:36 ` Florian Fainelli
2013-06-04 16:01 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-04 16:09 ` Florian Fainelli
2013-06-04 17:17 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-06-05 9:23 ` Alexandre Belloni
2013-06-05 11:21 ` Arnd Bergmann
2013-05-28 11:43 ` [PATCHv2 2/3] arm: mxs: don't check for CONFIG_PHYLIB as builtin Alexandre Belloni
2013-05-28 11:43 ` [PATCHv2 3/3] arm: imx: " Alexandre Belloni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6466898.RnYOe3jpGG@wuerfel \
--to=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox