From: Muhammad Usama Anjum <usama.anjum@arm.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: usama.anjum@arm.com, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@gmail.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@arm.com>,
Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.kachhap@arm.com>,
Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@arm.com>,
open list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM64 PORT (AARCH64 ARCHITECTURE)"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK"
<linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/5] selftests/arm64: Print missing MTE TAP headers
Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2026 11:21:20 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6b34dd9f-b65f-4384-9e43-4bf0a83be2a5@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <988acb8e-2918-4f88-99b8-a0b1a09f4793@sirena.org.uk>
On 21/08/2026 5:21 pm, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 21, 2026 at 05:11:28PM +0100, Muhammad Usama Anjum wrote:
>> On 21/08/2026 5:04 pm, Mark Brown wrote:
>
>>> This should probably just be a single patch with patch 1.
>
>> My idea here is that the first patch would get backported as that's
>> true logs cleanup patch. (1024 lines of 1..1 are avoided with that).
>> This patch wouldn't get backported. Its just formatting fixing of the
>> output.
>
> I'm not sure there's any problem with the extra backports, and it's a
> spec correctness fix for the output which given the existing scope of
> stable backports is probably reasonable.
Okay. I'll merge this patch into the first patch; while keeping the first
patch's fixes tag intact.
--
Thanks,
Usama
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-25 10:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-21 14:15 [PATCH v2 0/5] selftest/arm64: Fix MTE test setup and TAP reporting Muhammad Usama Anjum
2026-08-21 14:15 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] selftests/arm64: Print TAP header Muhammad Usama Anjum
2026-08-21 14:15 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] selftests/arm64: Print missing MTE TAP headers Muhammad Usama Anjum
2026-08-21 16:04 ` Mark Brown
2026-08-21 16:11 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
2026-08-21 16:21 ` Mark Brown
2026-08-25 10:21 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum [this message]
2026-08-21 14:15 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] selftests/arm64: Treat KSM merge_across_nodes as optional Muhammad Usama Anjum
2026-08-21 15:43 ` Mark Brown
2026-08-21 15:56 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
2026-08-21 14:15 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] selftests/arm64: Fix MTE prctl TAP plan Muhammad Usama Anjum
2026-08-21 14:15 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] selftests/arm64: Add MTE test config fragment Muhammad Usama Anjum
2026-08-21 16:07 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6b34dd9f-b65f-4384-9e43-4bf0a83be2a5@arm.com \
--to=usama.anjum@arm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=amit.kachhap@arm.com \
--cc=andreyknvl@gmail.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=vincenzo.frascino@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yeoreum.yun@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox