From: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
To: "Adrian Barnaś" <abarnas@google.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@kernel.org>,
"Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)" <rppt@kernel.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@gentwo.org>,
Yang Shi <yang@os.amperecomputing.com>,
Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@google.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/6] arm64: mm: fix restoring linear map permissions on execmem cache clean
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2026 09:33:18 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <751c564b-d6c3-4bd5-a269-e3de89e8cf13@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <402e247d-1eb9-4842-ba9a-712a3bb9b438@arm.com>
On 18/06/2026 16:05, Ryan Roberts wrote:
> On 11/06/2026 14:01, Adrian Barnaś wrote:
>> Strip the read-only attribute from the selected memory range when
>> restoring the linear map after an execmem cache clean.
>>
>> An execmem cache clean is performed when a cache block becomes empty
>> after unloading a module. When making the memory valid again, the linear
>> memory alias must also have its read-only attribute cleared.
>>
>> Without this change, the linear memory alias remains read-only even
>> after the execmem cache block itself is freed, which prevents subsequent
>> allocations from writing to that memory.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Adrian Barnaś <abarnas@google.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/mm/pageattr.c | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/mm/pageattr.c b/arch/arm64/mm/pageattr.c
>> index 88720bbba892..eaefdf90b0d5 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/mm/pageattr.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/mm/pageattr.c
>> @@ -239,6 +239,13 @@ int set_memory_x(unsigned long addr, int numpages)
>> __pgprot(PTE_PXN));
>> }
>>
>> +static int set_memory_default(unsigned long addr, int numpages)
>> +{
>> + return __change_memory_common(addr, PAGE_SIZE * numpages,
>> + __pgprot(PTE_VALID),
>> + __pgprot(PTE_RDONLY));
>
> This is not sufficient to convert an invalid entry to valid. As well as setting
> the PTE_VALID bit, you would also need to clear the PTE_PRESENT_INVALID and set
> PTE_MAYBE_NG.
>
> e.g:
>
> int set_memory_valid(unsigned long addr, int numpages, int enable)
> {
> if (enable)
> return __change_memory_common(addr, PAGE_SIZE * numpages,
> __pgprot(PTE_PRESENT_VALID_KERNEL),
> __pgprot(PTE_PRESENT_INVALID));
>
>
>> +}
>> +
>> int set_memory_valid(unsigned long addr, int numpages, int enable)
>> {
>> if (enable)
>> @@ -362,7 +369,15 @@ int set_direct_map_valid_noflush(struct page *page, unsigned nr, bool valid)
>> if (!can_set_direct_map())
>> return 0;
>>
>> - return set_memory_valid(addr, nr, valid);
>> + /*
>> + * Execmem cache uses this function to reset permissions on linear mapping
>> + * when freeing unused cache block. On x86 it makes memory RW which is
>> + * desirable. On ARM64 set_memory_valid() just change valid bit which
>> + * leave direct mapping read-only so use set_memory_default instead.
>> + */
>> +
>> + return valid ? set_memory_default(addr, nr) :
>> + set_memory_valid(addr, nr, false);
>
> Surely execmem should just be using set_direct_map_default_noflush() if that's
> the behaviour it wants?
>
> I think that the current implementation of set_direct_map_default_noflush()
> doesn't undo the effects of set_memory_nx() / set_memory_x(). That might be
> worth checking?
It's also worth mentioning that set_direct_map_valid_noflush() has "noflush" in
the name, implies it doesn't expect/require any TLB flushing to occur. But the
implementation will perform tlb flushing for any case that is not just a
invalid->valid transition (which for the existing impl is the case when
valid=true and for your changes is never the case - see __change_memory_common).
But execmem doesn't do any tlb flushing so it looks to me like it actually
requires that set_direct_map_valid_noflush() handles the tlb flushing? All seems
a bit fishy and probably warrants a cleanup to make things clearer.
>
> Thanks,
> Ryan
>
>
>> }
>>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-19 8:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-11 13:01 [RFC PATCH 0/6] arm64: mm: Introducing ROX CACHE to ARM64 systems with bbml2 no abort Adrian Barnaś
2026-06-11 13:01 ` [RFC PATCH 1/6] arm64: mm: explicitly declare module and ftrace execmem regions Adrian Barnaś
2026-06-11 13:36 ` Brendan Jackman
2026-06-11 13:01 ` [RFC PATCH 2/6] arm64: mm: allow huge vmap permission adjustments with bbml2_no_abort Adrian Barnaś
2026-06-18 14:21 ` Ryan Roberts
2026-06-11 13:01 ` [RFC PATCH 3/6] arm64: mm: fix restoring linear map permissions on execmem cache clean Adrian Barnaś
2026-06-11 13:54 ` Brendan Jackman
2026-06-12 7:17 ` Mike Rapoport
2026-06-17 15:18 ` Adrian Barnaś
2026-06-17 18:40 ` Mike Rapoport
2026-06-18 15:05 ` Ryan Roberts
2026-06-19 8:33 ` Ryan Roberts [this message]
2026-06-11 13:01 ` [RFC PATCH 4/6] arm64: mm: add helper to fill execmem with trapping instructions Adrian Barnaś
2026-06-19 10:54 ` Ryan Roberts
2026-06-19 10:58 ` Mike Rapoport
2026-06-11 13:01 ` [RFC PATCH 5/6] arm64: execmem: enable EXECMEM_ROX_CACHE on supported CPUs Adrian Barnaś
2026-06-19 12:09 ` Ryan Roberts
2026-06-11 13:01 ` [RFC PATCH 6/6] arm64: mm: support PMD page coalescing in the linear map Adrian Barnaś
2026-06-19 13:40 ` Ryan Roberts
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=751c564b-d6c3-4bd5-a269-e3de89e8cf13@arm.com \
--to=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=abarnas@google.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=cl@gentwo.org \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=jackmanb@google.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yang@os.amperecomputing.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox