Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>,
	Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
	Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
	Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
	Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>,
	Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@arm.com>,
	Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>,
	linux-coco@lists.linux.dev,
	Ganapatrao Kulkarni <gankulkarni@os.amperecomputing.com>,
	Gavin Shan <gshan@redhat.com>,
	Shanker Donthineni <sdonthineni@nvidia.com>,
	Alper Gun <alpergun@google.com>,
	"Aneesh Kumar K . V" <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>,
	Emi Kisanuki <fj0570is@fujitsu.com>,
	Vishal Annapurve <vannapurve@google.com>,
	WeiLin.Chang@arm.com, Lorenzo.Pieralisi2@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 14/44] arm64: RMI: Basic infrastructure for creating a realm.
Date: Thu, 28 May 2026 08:10:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <86ik88ui0g.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260513131757.116630-15-steven.price@arm.com>

On Wed, 13 May 2026 14:17:22 +0100,
Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com> wrote:
> 
> Introduce the skeleton functions for creating and destroying a realm.
> The IPA size requested is checked against what the RMM supports.
> 
> The actual work of constructing the realm will be added in future
> patches.

Again, $SUBJECT doesn't reflect that this is purely a KVM patch.

> 
> Signed-off-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
> ---
> Changes since v13:
>  * Rebased and updated to RMM-v2.0-bet1.
>  * Auxiliary granules have been removed in RMM-v2.0-bet1
> Changes since v12:
>  * Drop the RMM_PAGE_{SHIFT,SIZE} defines - the RMM is now configured to
>    be the same as the host's page size.
>  * Rework delegate/undelegate functions to use the new RMI range based
>    operations.
> Changes since v11:
>  * Major rework to drop the realm configuration and make the
>    construction of realms implicit rather than driven by the VMM
>    directly.
>  * The code to create RDs, handle VMIDs etc is moved to later patches.
> Changes since v10:
>  * Rename from RME to RMI.
>  * Move the stage2 cleanup to a later patch.
> Changes since v9:
>  * Avoid walking the stage 2 page tables when destroying the realm -
>    the real ones are not accessible to the non-secure world, and the RMM
>    may leave junk in the physical pages when returning them.
>  * Fix an error path in realm_create_rd() to actually return an error value.
> Changes since v8:
>  * Fix free_delegated_granule() to not call kvm_account_pgtable_pages();
>    a separate wrapper will be introduced in a later patch to deal with
>    RTTs.
>  * Minor code cleanups following review.
> Changes since v7:
>  * Minor code cleanup following Gavin's review.
> Changes since v6:
>  * Separate RMM RTT calculations from host PAGE_SIZE. This allows the
>    host page size to be larger than 4k while still communicating with an
>    RMM which uses 4k granules.
> Changes since v5:
>  * Introduce free_delegated_granule() to replace many
>    undelegate/free_page() instances and centralise the comment on
>    leaking when the undelegate fails.
>  * Several other minor improvements suggested by reviews - thanks for
>    the feedback!
> Changes since v2:
>  * Improved commit description.
>  * Improved return failures for rmi_check_version().
>  * Clear contents of PGD after it has been undelegated in case the RMM
>    left stale data.
>  * Minor changes to reflect changes in previous patches.
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h | 29 ++++++++++++++
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_rmi.h     | 51 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c                 | 12 ++++++
>  arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c                 | 12 +++++-
>  arch/arm64/kvm/rmi.c                 | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  5 files changed, 159 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
> index 5bf3d7e1d92c..82fd777bd9bb 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_emulate.h
> @@ -688,4 +688,33 @@ static inline void vcpu_set_hcrx(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  			vcpu->arch.hcrx_el2 |= HCRX_EL2_EnASR;
>  	}
>  }
> +
> +static inline bool kvm_is_realm(struct kvm *kvm)
> +{
> +	if (static_branch_unlikely(&kvm_rmi_is_available))
> +		return kvm->arch.is_realm;
> +	return false;
> +}
> +
> +static inline enum realm_state kvm_realm_state(struct kvm *kvm)
> +{
> +	return READ_ONCE(kvm->arch.realm.state);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void kvm_set_realm_state(struct kvm *kvm,
> +				       enum realm_state new_state)
> +{
> +	WRITE_ONCE(kvm->arch.realm.state, new_state);
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool kvm_realm_is_created(struct kvm *kvm)
> +{
> +	return kvm_is_realm(kvm) && kvm_realm_state(kvm) != REALM_STATE_NONE;
> +}
> +
> +static inline bool vcpu_is_rec(const struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +{
> +	return false;
> +}
> +
>  #endif /* __ARM64_KVM_EMULATE_H__ */
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_rmi.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_rmi.h
> index 4936007947fd..9de34983ee52 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_rmi.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_rmi.h
> @@ -6,12 +6,63 @@
>  #ifndef __ASM_KVM_RMI_H
>  #define __ASM_KVM_RMI_H
>  
> +#include <asm/rmi_smc.h>
> +
> +/**
> + * enum realm_state - State of a Realm
> + */
> +enum realm_state {
> +	/**
> +	 * @REALM_STATE_NONE:
> +	 *      Realm has not yet been created. rmi_realm_create() has not
> +	 *      yet been called.
> +	 */
> +	REALM_STATE_NONE,
> +	/**
> +	 * @REALM_STATE_NEW:
> +	 *      Realm is under construction, rmi_realm_create() has been
> +	 *      called, but it is not yet activated. Pages may be populated.
> +	 */
> +	REALM_STATE_NEW,
> +	/**
> +	 * @REALM_STATE_ACTIVE:
> +	 *      Realm has been created and is eligible for execution with
> +	 *      rmi_rec_enter(). Pages may no longer be populated with
> +	 *      rmi_data_create().
> +	 */
> +	REALM_STATE_ACTIVE,
> +	/**
> +	 * @REALM_STATE_DYING:
> +	 *      Realm is in the process of being destroyed or has already been
> +	 *      destroyed.
> +	 */
> +	REALM_STATE_DYING,
> +	/**
> +	 * @REALM_STATE_DEAD:
> +	 *      Realm has been destroyed.
> +	 */
> +	REALM_STATE_DEAD
> +};

What is the ABI status of this state? Is it purely internal to KVM? Or
is it something that the RMM actively tracks?

> +
>  /**
>   * struct realm - Additional per VM data for a Realm
> + *
> + * @state: The lifetime state machine for the realm
> + * @rd: Kernel mapping of the Realm Descriptor (RD)
> + * @params: Parameters for the RMI_REALM_CREATE command
> + * @ia_bits: Number of valid Input Address bits in the IPA
>   */
>  struct realm {
> +	enum realm_state state;
> +	void *rd;

Why is this void? Doesn't it have a proper type?

> +	struct realm_params *params;
> +	unsigned int ia_bits;

Consider reordering this structure to avoid holes.

>  };
>  
>  void kvm_init_rmi(void);
> +u32 kvm_realm_ipa_limit(void);

The use of 'realm' is confusing. This is not a per-realm property, but
something global. I'd rather reserve the term 'realm' for CCA VMs (cue
the two prototypes below).

> +
> +int kvm_init_realm(struct kvm *kvm);
> +void kvm_destroy_realm(struct kvm *kvm);
>  
>  #endif /* __ASM_KVM_RMI_H */
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> index 247e03b33035..18251e561524 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/arm.c
> @@ -264,6 +264,13 @@ int kvm_arch_init_vm(struct kvm *kvm, unsigned long type)
>  
>  	bitmap_zero(kvm->arch.vcpu_features, KVM_VCPU_MAX_FEATURES);
>  
> +	/* Initialise the realm bits after the generic bits are enabled */
> +	if (kvm_is_realm(kvm)) {
> +		ret = kvm_init_realm(kvm);
> +		if (ret)
> +			goto err_uninit_mmu;
> +	}
> +
>  	return 0;
>  
>  err_uninit_mmu:
> @@ -326,6 +333,8 @@ void kvm_arch_destroy_vm(struct kvm *kvm)
>  	kvm_unshare_hyp(kvm, kvm + 1);
>  
>  	kvm_arm_teardown_hypercalls(kvm);
> +	if (kvm_is_realm(kvm))
> +		kvm_destroy_realm(kvm);
>  }
>  
>  static bool kvm_has_full_ptr_auth(void)
> @@ -486,6 +495,9 @@ int kvm_vm_ioctl_check_extension(struct kvm *kvm, long ext)
>  		else
>  			r = kvm_supports_cacheable_pfnmap();
>  		break;
> +	case KVM_CAP_ARM_RMI:
> +		r = static_key_enabled(&kvm_rmi_is_available);
> +		break;
>  
>  	default:
>  		r = 0;
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> index d089c107d9b7..ba8286472286 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/mmu.c
> @@ -877,10 +877,14 @@ static struct kvm_pgtable_mm_ops kvm_s2_mm_ops = {
>  
>  static int kvm_init_ipa_range(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu, unsigned long type)
>  {
> +	struct kvm *kvm = kvm_s2_mmu_to_kvm(mmu);
>  	u32 kvm_ipa_limit = get_kvm_ipa_limit();
>  	u64 mmfr0, mmfr1;
>  	u32 phys_shift;
>  
> +	if (kvm_is_realm(kvm))
> +		kvm_ipa_limit = kvm_realm_ipa_limit();
> +
>  	phys_shift = KVM_VM_TYPE_ARM_IPA_SIZE(type);
>  	if (is_protected_kvm_enabled()) {
>  		phys_shift = kvm_ipa_limit;
> @@ -974,6 +978,8 @@ int kvm_init_stage2_mmu(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu, unsigned long t
>  		return -EINVAL;
>  	}
>  
> +	mmu->arch = &kvm->arch;
> +
>  	err = kvm_init_ipa_range(mmu, type);
>  	if (err)
>  		return err;
> @@ -982,7 +988,6 @@ int kvm_init_stage2_mmu(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu, unsigned long t
>  	if (!pgt)
>  		return -ENOMEM;
>  
> -	mmu->arch = &kvm->arch;

Why moving this init?

>  	err = KVM_PGT_FN(kvm_pgtable_stage2_init)(pgt, mmu, &kvm_s2_mm_ops);
>  	if (err)
>  		goto out_free_pgtable;
> @@ -1114,7 +1119,10 @@ void kvm_free_stage2_pgd(struct kvm_s2_mmu *mmu)
>  	write_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
>  
>  	if (pgt) {
> -		kvm_stage2_destroy(pgt);
> +		if (!kvm_is_realm(kvm))
> +			kvm_stage2_destroy(pgt);
> +		else
> +			kvm_pgtable_stage2_destroy_pgd(pgt);

Why can't you make kvm_stage2_destroy() do the right thing? Surely the
PTs have to be reclaimed one way or another.

>  		kfree(pgt);
>  	}
>  }
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/rmi.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/rmi.c
> index 6e28b669ded2..f51ec667445e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/rmi.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/rmi.c
> @@ -5,6 +5,8 @@
>  
>  #include <linux/kvm_host.h>
>  
> +#include <asm/kvm_emulate.h>
> +#include <asm/kvm_mmu.h>
>  #include <asm/kvm_pgtable.h>
>  #include <asm/rmi_cmds.h>
>  #include <asm/virt.h>
> @@ -14,6 +16,61 @@ static bool rmi_has_feature(unsigned long feature)
>  	return !!u64_get_bits(rmm_feat_reg0, feature);
>  }
>  
> +u32 kvm_realm_ipa_limit(void)
> +{
> +	return u64_get_bits(rmm_feat_reg0, RMI_FEATURE_REGISTER_0_S2SZ);
> +}
> +
> +void kvm_destroy_realm(struct kvm *kvm)
> +{
> +	struct realm *realm = &kvm->arch.realm;
> +	size_t pgd_size = kvm_pgtable_stage2_pgd_size(kvm->arch.mmu.vtcr);
> +
> +	if (realm->params) {
> +		free_page((unsigned long)realm->params);
> +		realm->params = NULL;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (!kvm_realm_is_created(kvm))
> +		return;
> +
> +	kvm_set_realm_state(kvm, REALM_STATE_DYING);
> +
> +	write_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> +	kvm_stage2_unmap_range(&kvm->arch.mmu, 0,
> +			       BIT(realm->ia_bits - 1), true);
> +	write_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
> +
> +	if (realm->rd) {
> +		phys_addr_t rd_phys = virt_to_phys(realm->rd);
> +
> +		if (WARN_ON(rmi_realm_terminate(rd_phys)))
> +			return;
> +
> +		if (WARN_ON(rmi_realm_destroy(rd_phys)))
> +			return;
> +		free_delegated_page(rd_phys);
> +		realm->rd = NULL;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (WARN_ON(rmi_undelegate_range(kvm->arch.mmu.pgd_phys, pgd_size)))
> +		return;
> +
> +	kvm_set_realm_state(kvm, REALM_STATE_DEAD);
> +
> +	/* Now that the Realm is destroyed, free the entry level RTTs */
> +	kvm_free_stage2_pgd(&kvm->arch.mmu);
> +}

This really needs documentation: what happens at each stage? What
memory is reclaimed when?

But even more importantly, why is this built in a completely parallel
way, potentially deviating from the existing KVM S2 management?

Thanks,

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-05-28  7:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 107+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-13 13:17 [PATCH v14 00/44] arm64: Support for Arm CCA in KVM Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 01/44] kvm: arm64: Include kvm_emulate.h in kvm/arm_psci.h Steven Price
2026-05-21 10:19   ` Marc Zyngier
2026-05-21 15:11     ` Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 02/44] kvm: arm64: Avoid including linux/kvm_host.h in kvm_pgtable.h Steven Price
2026-05-21 10:26   ` Marc Zyngier
2026-05-21 15:11     ` Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 03/44] arm64: RME: Handle Granule Protection Faults (GPFs) Steven Price
2026-05-21 12:25   ` Marc Zyngier
2026-05-21 15:15     ` Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 04/44] arm64: RMI: Add SMC definitions for calling the RMM Steven Price
2026-05-18  7:08   ` Gavin Shan
2026-05-20 16:01     ` Steven Price
2026-05-21 12:40   ` Marc Zyngier
2026-05-21 14:50     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-05-21 15:33     ` Steven Price
2026-05-22  9:58       ` Marc Zyngier
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 05/44] arm64: RMI: Add wrappers for RMI calls Steven Price
2026-05-19  5:35   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-05-21 15:44     ` Steven Price
2026-05-21  0:21   ` Gavin Shan
2026-05-21 15:44     ` Steven Price
2026-05-21 12:49   ` Marc Zyngier
2026-05-21 15:44     ` Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 06/44] arm64: RMI: Check for RMI support at init Steven Price
2026-05-21  0:39   ` Gavin Shan
2026-05-21 15:49     ` Steven Price
2026-05-25  6:58       ` Gavin Shan
2026-05-21 13:02   ` Marc Zyngier
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 07/44] arm64: RMI: Configure the RMM with the host's page size Steven Price
2026-05-21  0:51   ` Gavin Shan
2026-05-21 22:36     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-05-21 13:30   ` Marc Zyngier
2026-05-21 14:53     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 08/44] arm64: RMI: Ensure that the RMM has GPT entries for memory Steven Price
2026-05-19  5:55   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-05-21  0:58   ` Gavin Shan
2026-05-21 13:47   ` Marc Zyngier
2026-05-21 14:24     ` Marc Zyngier
2026-05-21 15:39     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 09/44] arm64: RMI: Provide functions to delegate/undelegate ranges of memory Steven Price
2026-05-21 13:59   ` Marc Zyngier
2026-05-21 16:01     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-05-22 10:02       ` Marc Zyngier
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 10/44] arm64: RMI: Add support for SRO Steven Price
2026-05-14  8:01   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-05-14  9:33     ` Steven Price
2026-05-19  6:02   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-05-21  4:38   ` Gavin Shan
2026-05-21 14:35   ` Marc Zyngier
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 11/44] arm64: RMI: Check for RMI support at KVM init Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 12/44] arm64: RMI: Check for LPA2 support Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 13/44] arm64: RMI: Define the user ABI Steven Price
2026-05-26 22:17   ` Wei-Lin Chang
2026-05-27 15:21   ` Marc Zyngier
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 14/44] arm64: RMI: Basic infrastructure for creating a realm Steven Price
2026-05-19  6:31   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-05-28  7:10   ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 15/44] kvm: arm64: Don't expose unsupported capabilities for realm guests Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 16/44] KVM: arm64: Allow passing machine type in KVM creation Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 17/44] arm64: RMI: RTT tear down Steven Price
2026-05-19  6:54   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-05-26 22:27   ` Wei-Lin Chang
2026-05-26 22:32   ` Wei-Lin Chang
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 18/44] arm64: RMI: Activate realm on first VCPU run Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 19/44] arm64: RMI: Allocate/free RECs to match vCPUs Steven Price
2026-05-26 22:39   ` Wei-Lin Chang
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 20/44] arm64: RMI: Support for the VGIC in realms Steven Price
2026-05-28  4:07   ` Gavin Shan
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 21/44] KVM: arm64: Support timers in realm RECs Steven Price
2026-05-28  4:11   ` Gavin Shan
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 22/44] arm64: RMI: Handle realm enter/exit Steven Price
2026-05-28  4:38   ` Gavin Shan
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 23/44] arm64: RMI: Handle RMI_EXIT_RIPAS_CHANGE Steven Price
2026-05-19  9:40   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-05-27 10:52   ` Wei-Lin Chang
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 24/44] KVM: arm64: Handle realm MMIO emulation Steven Price
2026-05-28  5:03   ` Gavin Shan
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 25/44] KVM: arm64: Expose support for private memory Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 26/44] arm64: RMI: Allow populating initial contents Steven Price
2026-05-28  5:30   ` Gavin Shan
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 27/44] arm64: RMI: Set RIPAS of initial memslots Steven Price
2026-05-19 10:02   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-05-19 10:13     ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-05-19 12:55       ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-05-19 13:06         ` Suzuki K Poulose
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 28/44] arm64: RMI: Create the realm descriptor Steven Price
2026-05-26 22:47   ` Wei-Lin Chang
2026-05-28  5:51   ` Gavin Shan
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 29/44] arm64: RMI: Runtime faulting of memory Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 30/44] KVM: arm64: Handle realm VCPU load Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 31/44] KVM: arm64: Validate register access for a Realm VM Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 32/44] KVM: arm64: Handle Realm PSCI requests Steven Price
2026-05-28  6:55   ` Gavin Shan
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 33/44] KVM: arm64: WARN on injected undef exceptions Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 34/44] arm64: RMI: allow userspace to inject aborts Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 35/44] arm64: RMI: support RSI_HOST_CALL Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 36/44] arm64: RMI: Allow checking SVE on VM instance Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 37/44] arm64: RMI: Prevent Device mappings for Realms Steven Price
2026-05-19 10:25   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 38/44] arm64: RMI: Propagate number of breakpoints and watchpoints to userspace Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 39/44] arm64: RMI: Set breakpoint parameters through SET_ONE_REG Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 40/44] arm64: RMI: Propagate max SVE vector length from RMM Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 41/44] arm64: RMI: Configure max SVE vector length for a Realm Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 42/44] arm64: RMI: Provide register list for unfinalized RMI RECs Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 43/44] arm64: RMI: Provide accurate register list Steven Price
2026-05-13 13:17 ` [PATCH v14 44/44] arm64: RMI: Enable realms to be created Steven Price

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=86ik88ui0g.wl-maz@kernel.org \
    --to=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=Lorenzo.Pieralisi2@arm.com \
    --cc=WeiLin.Chang@arm.com \
    --cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
    --cc=alpergun@google.com \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=christoffer.dall@arm.com \
    --cc=fj0570is@fujitsu.com \
    --cc=gankulkarni@os.amperecomputing.com \
    --cc=gshan@redhat.com \
    --cc=james.morse@arm.com \
    --cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
    --cc=sdonthineni@nvidia.com \
    --cc=steven.price@arm.com \
    --cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
    --cc=tabba@google.com \
    --cc=vannapurve@google.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox