From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Karl Mehltretter <kmehltretter@gmail.com>
Cc: Oliver Upton <oupton@kernel.org>, Fuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>,
Joey Gouly <joey.gouly@arm.com>,
Steffen Eiden <seiden@linux.ibm.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Zenghui Yu <yuzenghui@huawei.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] KVM: arm64: nv: Allocate the shadow S2 MMUs individually
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2026 08:58:12 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <86v79i9zl7.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <anizGXThM-haqQXU@gmail.com>
On Sun, 09 Aug 2026 19:11:54 +0100,
Karl Mehltretter <kmehltretter@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Aug 09, 2026 at 12:39:10PM +0100, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> > My current patch is as follows, and so far, I haven't seen much that I
> > like better.
> >
>
> Hi Marc,
>
> Thanks for your revised patch.
> I think one correctness issue is in there.
>
> > + for (i = 0; !ret && i < S2_MMU_PER_VCPU; i++)
> > + ret = init_nested_s2_mmu(kvm, &tmp[i]);
>
> > + if (ret) {
> > + while (--i >= 0)
> > + kvm_free_stage2_pgd(&tmp[i]);
>
> The increment expression of the for loop still runs after an error.
Yup. Should be fixed with
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c
index 5b69a0f382320..50d6dcc75582c 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/nested.c
@@ -96,8 +96,11 @@ int kvm_vcpu_init_nested(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
if (!tmp)
ret = -ENOMEM;
- for (i = 0; !ret && i < S2_MMU_PER_VCPU; i++)
+ for (i = 0; !ret && i < S2_MMU_PER_VCPU; i++) {
ret = init_nested_s2_mmu(kvm, &tmp[i]);
+ if (ret)
+ break;
+ }
if (ret) {
while (--i >= 0)
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-10 7:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-03 22:44 [PATCH 1/2] KVM: arm64: nv: Allocate the shadow S2 MMUs individually Karl Mehltretter
2026-08-03 22:44 ` [PATCH 2/2] KVM: arm64: selftests: Add a nested S2 MMU realloc test Karl Mehltretter
2026-08-04 14:44 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-08-04 10:24 ` [PATCH 1/2] KVM: arm64: nv: Allocate the shadow S2 MMUs individually Wei-Lin Chang
2026-08-04 14:31 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-08-04 14:56 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-08-04 21:54 ` Karl Mehltretter
2026-08-05 7:32 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-08-05 21:39 ` Karl Mehltretter
2026-08-07 17:08 ` Karl Mehltretter
2026-08-09 11:39 ` Marc Zyngier
2026-08-09 18:11 ` Karl Mehltretter
2026-08-10 7:58 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=86v79i9zl7.wl-maz@kernel.org \
--to=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kmehltretter@gmail.com \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oupton@kernel.org \
--cc=seiden@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=tabba@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yuzenghui@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox