public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: dietmar.eggemann@arm.com (Dietmar Eggemann)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/6] drivers base/arch_topology: frequency-invariant load-tracking support
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2017 09:55:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <9716a48d-8198-a1d8-9450-de6386338665@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKfTPtDB=5mQnJfzES+iU-nmNjVDM48f_iKuc7WefkRVWW4JOQ@mail.gmail.com>

On 06/12/2017 04:27 PM, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> On 8 June 2017 at 09:55, Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com> wrote:

Hi Vincent,

Thanks for the review!

[...]

>> @@ -225,8 +265,14 @@ static int __init register_cpufreq_notifier(void)
>>
>>          cpumask_copy(cpus_to_visit, cpu_possible_mask);
>>
>> -       return cpufreq_register_notifier(&init_cpu_capacity_notifier,
>> -                                        CPUFREQ_POLICY_NOTIFIER);
>> +       ret = cpufreq_register_notifier(&init_cpu_capacity_notifier,
>> +                                       CPUFREQ_POLICY_NOTIFIER);
>> +
>> +       if (ret)
> 
> Don't you have to free memory allocated for cpus_to_visit in case of
> errot ? it was not done before your patch as well

Yes, we should free cpus_to_visit if the policy notifier registration
fails. But IMHO also, once the parsing of the capacity-dmips-mhz property
is done. free cpus_to_visit is only used in the notifier call 
init_cpu_capacity_callback() after being allocated and initialized in
register_cpufreq_notifier().

We could add something like this as the first patch of this set. Only
mildly tested on Juno. Juri, what do you think?

Author: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Date:   Tue Jun 13 23:21:59 2017 +0100

    drivers base/arch_topology: free cpumask cpus_to_visit
    
    Free cpumask cpus_to_visit in case registering
    init_cpu_capacity_notifier has failed or the parsing of the cpu
    capacity-dmips-mhz property is done. The cpumask cpus_to_visit is
    only used inside the notifier call init_cpu_capacity_callback.
    
    Reported-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
    Signed-off-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>

diff --git a/drivers/base/arch_topology.c b/drivers/base/arch_topology.c
index d1c33a85059e..f4832c662762 100644
--- a/drivers/base/arch_topology.c
+++ b/drivers/base/arch_topology.c
@@ -206,6 +206,8 @@ static struct notifier_block init_cpu_capacity_notifier = {
 
 static int __init register_cpufreq_notifier(void)
 {
+       int ret;
+
        /*
         * on ACPI-based systems we need to use the default cpu capacity
         * until we have the necessary code to parse the cpu capacity, so
@@ -221,13 +223,19 @@ static int __init register_cpufreq_notifier(void)
 
        cpumask_copy(cpus_to_visit, cpu_possible_mask);
 
-       return cpufreq_register_notifier(&init_cpu_capacity_notifier,
-                                        CPUFREQ_POLICY_NOTIFIER);
+       ret = cpufreq_register_notifier(&init_cpu_capacity_notifier,
+                                       CPUFREQ_POLICY_NOTIFIER);
+
+       if (ret)
+               free_cpumask_var(cpus_to_visit);
+
+       return ret;
 }
 core_initcall(register_cpufreq_notifier);
 
 static void parsing_done_workfn(struct work_struct *work)
 {
+       free_cpumask_var(cpus_to_visit);
        cpufreq_unregister_notifier(&init_cpu_capacity_notifier,
                                         CPUFREQ_POLICY_NOTIFIER);
 }

>> +               return ret;
>> +
>> +       return cpufreq_register_notifier(&set_freq_scale_notifier,
>> +                                        CPUFREQ_TRANSITION_NOTIFIER);
> 
> Don't you have to unregister the other cpufreq notifier if an error is
> returned and free the mem allocated for cpus_to_visit ?

IMHO, that's not necessary.

The transition notifier works completely independent from the policy
notifier. In case the latter gets registered correctly and the registration
of the former fails, the notifier call of the policy notifier still parses
the capacity-dmips-mhz property information and sets per_cpu(max_freq, cpu).

The notifier call set_freq_scale_callback() of the transition notifier will
not be called so that frequency invariance always returns
SCHED_CAPACITY_SCALE.

After the policy notifier has finished its work, it schedules
parsing_done_work() in which it gets unregistered.

[...]

  reply	other threads:[~2017-06-14  7:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-06-08  7:55 [PATCH 0/6] arm, arm64: frequency- and cpu-invariant accounting support for task scheduler Dietmar Eggemann
2017-06-08  7:55 ` [PATCH 1/6] drivers base/arch_topology: prepare cpufreq policy notifier for frequency-invariant load-tracking support Dietmar Eggemann
2017-06-12 14:45   ` Vincent Guittot
2017-06-08  7:55 ` [PATCH 2/6] drivers base/arch_topology: " Dietmar Eggemann
2017-06-12 14:27   ` Vincent Guittot
2017-06-14  7:55     ` Dietmar Eggemann [this message]
2017-06-14 13:08       ` Vincent Guittot
2017-06-15  8:28         ` Juri Lelli
2017-06-21 16:40         ` Dietmar Eggemann
2017-06-20  6:17   ` Viresh Kumar
2017-06-21  0:31     ` Saravana Kannan
2017-06-21  5:37       ` Viresh Kumar
2017-06-21 16:57         ` Morten Rasmussen
2017-06-22  4:06           ` Viresh Kumar
2017-06-22  9:59             ` Morten Rasmussen
2017-06-21 17:08       ` Dietmar Eggemann
2017-06-21 16:38     ` Dietmar Eggemann
2017-06-22  3:55       ` Viresh Kumar
2017-06-26  8:28   ` Dietmar Eggemann
2017-06-08  7:55 ` [PATCH 3/6] arm: wire frequency-invariant accounting support up to the task scheduler Dietmar Eggemann
2017-06-12 14:30   ` Vincent Guittot
2017-06-08  7:55 ` [PATCH 4/6] arm: wire cpu-invariant " Dietmar Eggemann
2017-06-12 14:31   ` Vincent Guittot
2017-06-08  7:55 ` [PATCH 5/6] arm64: wire frequency-invariant " Dietmar Eggemann
2017-06-12 13:06   ` Catalin Marinas
2017-06-12 14:32   ` Vincent Guittot
2017-06-08  7:55 ` [PATCH 6/6] arm64: wire cpu-invariant " Dietmar Eggemann
2017-06-12 13:07   ` Catalin Marinas
2017-06-12 14:33   ` Vincent Guittot
2017-06-12 13:00 ` [PATCH 0/6] arm, arm64: frequency- and cpu-invariant accounting support for " Juri Lelli
2017-06-12 13:04   ` Juri Lelli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=9716a48d-8198-a1d8-9450-de6386338665@arm.com \
    --to=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox