* [PATCH v10 11/24] firmware: arm_scmi: Add Telemetry notification support
2026-08-15 23:25 [PATCH v10 00/24] Introduce SCMI Telemetry support Cristian Marussi
@ 2026-08-15 23:25 ` Cristian Marussi
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Cristian Marussi @ 2026-08-15 23:25 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-kernel, linux-arm-kernel, arm-scmi, linux-doc
Cc: sudeep.holla, james.quinlan, f.fainelli, vincent.guittot,
etienne.carriere, peng.fan, michal.simek, d-gole, jic23,
elif.topuz, lukasz.luba, philip.radford, david,
souvik.chakravarty, leitao, kas, puranjay, usama.arif,
kernel-team, Cristian Marussi
Add support for notifications to Telemetry protocol and register an
internal notifier during protocol initialization: any DE value received
inside a notification payload will be cached for future user consumption.
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
---
v8 --> v9
- fix notif boundary and wraparound checks
- rollback notif report payload in __le32 format before parsing
to align with single read payload parsing
v6 --> v7
- fix sparse warn on notof payload handling
v5 -> v6
- use protocol instance notifier interface
- use new RAW macros to access payload
- add proper boundary checks on notification payload
- fix mutex scope in msg payld parsing
- add notification payload consistency check (Sahiko)
v3 -> v4
- use TDE cache to save DEs received via msg payload
v2 --> v3
- changed a few dev_err into traces
- split from monolithic telemetry protocol patch
- use memcpy_from_le32
---
drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/telemetry.c | 172 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--
include/linux/scmi_protocol.h | 9 ++
2 files changed, 168 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/telemetry.c b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/telemetry.c
index 97e267e5cb62..4d8fbc50b1f4 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/telemetry.c
+++ b/drivers/firmware/arm_scmi/telemetry.c
@@ -503,12 +503,16 @@ struct telemetry_info {
struct list_head free_des;
struct list_head fcs_des;
struct scmi_telemetry_info info;
+ struct notifier_block telemetry_nb;
atomic_t rinfo_initializing;
struct completion rinfo_initdone;
struct scmi_telemetry_res_info *rinfo;
struct scmi_telemetry_res_info *(*res_get)(struct telemetry_info *ti);
};
+#define telemetry_nb_to_info(x) \
+ container_of(x, struct telemetry_info, telemetry_nb)
+
static struct scmi_telemetry_res_info *
__scmi_telemetry_resources_get(struct telemetry_info *ti);
@@ -2785,6 +2789,7 @@ scmi_telemetry_msg_payld_process(struct telemetry_info *ti,
while (next < num_dwords) {
struct payload *payld = (struct payload *)&dwords[next];
+ struct scmi_telemetry_de_sample sample = {};
struct scmi_telemetry_de *de;
struct telemetry_de *tde;
u32 de_id, meta = le32_to_cpu(payld->meta);
@@ -2804,23 +2809,28 @@ scmi_telemetry_msg_payld_process(struct telemetry_info *ti,
de = xa_load(&ti->xa_des, de_id);
if (!de || !de->enabled) {
- dev_err(ti->ph->dev,
- "MSG - Received INVALID DE - ID:%u enabled:%c\n",
- de_id, de ? (de->enabled ? 'Y' : 'N') : 'X');
+ trace_scmi_tlm_access(de_id, de ? "MSG_DE_DISABLED" :
+ "MSG_DE_UNKNOWN", 0, 0);
continue;
}
tde = to_tde(de);
- guard(mutex)(&tde->mtx);
- tde->cached_msg = true;
- tde->last_val = LINE_DATA_GET_RAW(&payld->tsl);
- /* TODO BLK_TS in notification payloads */
- tde->last_ts = HAS_LINE_EXT_RAW(meta) &&
- LINE_TS_VALID_RAW(meta) ?
- LINE_TSTAMP_GET_RAW(&payld->tsl) : 0;
+ scoped_guard(mutex, &tde->mtx) {
+ tde->cached_msg = true;
+ scmi_telemetry_uuid_link(tde, ti->primary_uuid);
+ tde->last_val = LINE_DATA_GET_RAW(&payld->tsl);
+ tde->last_ts = HAS_LINE_EXT_RAW(meta) &&
+ LINE_TS_VALID_RAW(meta) ?
+ LINE_TSTAMP_GET_RAW(&payld->tsl) : 0;
+ sample.val = tde->last_val;
+ sample.tstamp = tde->last_ts;
+ }
- trace_scmi_tlm_collect(tde->last_ts, tde->de.info->id,
- tde->last_val, "MESSAGE");
+ /* Trace originally read tstamp */
+ trace_scmi_tlm_collect(sample.tstamp, de->info->id, sample.val,
+ "MESSAGE");
+
+ scmi_telemetry_tde_cache_update(tde, &sample, NULL);
}
}
@@ -2974,6 +2984,121 @@ static const struct scmi_telemetry_proto_ops tlm_proto_ops = {
.reset = scmi_telemetry_reset,
};
+static bool
+scmi_telemetry_notify_supported(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph,
+ u8 evt_id, u32 src_id)
+{
+ struct telemetry_info *ti = ph->get_priv(ph);
+
+ return ti->info.continuos_update_support;
+}
+
+static int
+scmi_telemetry_set_notify_enabled(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph,
+ u8 evt_id, u32 src_id, bool enable)
+{
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static void *
+scmi_telemetry_fill_custom_report(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph,
+ u8 evt_id, ktime_t timestamp,
+ const void *payld, size_t payld_sz,
+ void *report, u32 *src_id)
+{
+ const struct scmi_telemetry_update_notify_payld *p = payld;
+ struct scmi_telemetry_update_report *r = report;
+ size_t dwords_sz, msg_payld_sz;
+
+ /* At least sized as an empty notification */
+ if (payld_sz < sizeof(*p))
+ return NULL;
+
+ r->timestamp = timestamp;
+ r->agent_id = le32_to_cpu(p->agent_id);
+ r->status = le32_to_cpu(p->status);
+ r->num_dwords = le32_to_cpu(p->num_dwords);
+
+ /*Check boundaries and wraparounds */
+ if (check_mul_overflow(r->num_dwords, sizeof(r->dwords[0]), &dwords_sz))
+ return NULL;
+
+ if (check_add_overflow(sizeof(*p), dwords_sz, &msg_payld_sz))
+ return NULL;
+
+ if (msg_payld_sz > payld_sz)
+ return NULL;
+
+ /*
+ * Allocated dwords and report are sized as max_msg_size, so as
+ * to allow for the maximum payload permitted by the configured
+ * transport. Overflow is not possible since out-of-size messages
+ * are dropped at the transport layer.
+ */
+ if (r->num_dwords)
+ memcpy_from_le32(r->dwords, p->array, r->num_dwords);
+
+ *src_id = 0;
+
+ return r;
+}
+
+static const struct scmi_event tlm_events[] = {
+ {
+ .id = SCMI_EVENT_TELEMETRY_UPDATE,
+ .max_payld_sz = 0,
+ .max_report_sz = 0,
+ },
+};
+
+static const struct scmi_event_ops tlm_event_ops = {
+ .is_notify_supported = scmi_telemetry_notify_supported,
+ .set_notify_enabled = scmi_telemetry_set_notify_enabled,
+ .fill_custom_report = scmi_telemetry_fill_custom_report,
+};
+
+static const struct scmi_protocol_events tlm_protocol_events = {
+ .queue_sz = SCMI_PROTO_QUEUE_SZ,
+ .ops = &tlm_event_ops,
+ .evts = tlm_events,
+ .num_events = ARRAY_SIZE(tlm_events),
+ .num_sources = 1,
+};
+
+static int scmi_telemetry_notifier(struct notifier_block *nb,
+ unsigned long event, void *data)
+{
+ struct scmi_telemetry_update_report *er = data;
+ struct telemetry_info *ti = telemetry_nb_to_info(nb);
+
+ if (er->status) {
+ trace_scmi_tlm_access(0, "BAD_NOTIF_MSG", 0, 0);
+ return NOTIFY_DONE;
+ }
+
+ trace_scmi_tlm_access(0, "TLM_UPDATE_MSG", 0, 0);
+ /* Lookup the embedded DEs in the notification payload ... */
+ if (er->num_dwords) {
+ size_t payld_bytes = sizeof(er->dwords[0]) * er->num_dwords;
+
+ __le32 *dwords __free(kvfree) =
+ kvcalloc(er->num_dwords, sizeof(*dwords), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!dwords)
+ return NOTIFY_DONE;
+
+ memcpy_to_le32(dwords, er->dwords, er->num_dwords);
+ /* The report payload size was bound checked on rx */
+ scmi_telemetry_msg_payld_process(ti, er->num_dwords, dwords,
+ payld_bytes);
+ }
+
+ /* ...scan the SHMTI/FCs for any other DE updates. */
+ if (ti->streaming_mode)
+ scmi_telemetry_scan_update(ti);
+
+ return NOTIFY_OK;
+}
+
/**
* scmi_telemetry_resources_alloc - Resources allocation
* @ti: A reference to the telemetry info descriptor for this instance
@@ -3297,7 +3422,27 @@ static int scmi_telemetry_protocol_init(const struct scmi_protocol_handle *ph)
ti->info.base.version = ph->version;
- return ph->set_priv(ph, ti);
+ ret = ph->set_priv(ph, ti);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ /*
+ * Register a notifier anyway straight upon protocol initialization
+ * since there could be some DEs that are ONLY reported by notifications
+ * even though the chosen collection method was SHMTI/FCs.
+ */
+ if (ti->info.continuos_update_support) {
+ ti->telemetry_nb.notifier_call = &scmi_telemetry_notifier;
+ ret = ph->instance_notifier_register(ph, SCMI_EVENT_TELEMETRY_UPDATE,
+ NULL, &ti->telemetry_nb);
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(ph->dev,
+ "Could NOT register Telemetry notifier\n");
+ return ret;
+ }
+ }
+
+ return 0;
}
static const struct scmi_protocol scmi_telemetry = {
@@ -3305,6 +3450,7 @@ static const struct scmi_protocol scmi_telemetry = {
.owner = THIS_MODULE,
.instance_init = &scmi_telemetry_protocol_init,
.ops = &tlm_proto_ops,
+ .events = &tlm_protocol_events,
.supported_version = SCMI_PROTOCOL_SUPPORTED_VERSION,
};
diff --git a/include/linux/scmi_protocol.h b/include/linux/scmi_protocol.h
index aadabaee6067..2d571c78613b 100644
--- a/include/linux/scmi_protocol.h
+++ b/include/linux/scmi_protocol.h
@@ -1252,6 +1252,7 @@ enum scmi_notification_events {
SCMI_EVENT_SYSTEM_POWER_STATE_NOTIFIER = 0x0,
SCMI_EVENT_POWERCAP_CAP_CHANGED = 0x0,
SCMI_EVENT_POWERCAP_MEASUREMENTS_CHANGED = 0x1,
+ SCMI_EVENT_TELEMETRY_UPDATE = 0x0,
};
struct scmi_power_state_changed_report {
@@ -1339,4 +1340,12 @@ struct scmi_powercap_meas_changed_report {
unsigned int domain_id;
unsigned int power;
};
+
+struct scmi_telemetry_update_report {
+ ktime_t timestamp;
+ unsigned int agent_id;
+ int status;
+ unsigned int num_dwords;
+ unsigned int dwords[];
+};
#endif /* _LINUX_SCMI_PROTOCOL_H */
--
2.54.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v10 11/24] firmware: arm_scmi: Add Telemetry notification support
[not found] <<20260815232604.3730754-12-cristian.marussi@arm.com>
@ 2026-08-21 15:20 ` Fayssal Benmlih
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Fayssal Benmlih @ 2026-08-21 15:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Cristian Marussi
Cc: arm-scmi@vger.kernel.org, d-gole@ti.com, david@kernel.org,
Elif Topuz, etienne.carriere@st.com, f.fainelli@gmail.com,
james.quinlan@broadcom.com, jic23@kernel.org, kas@kernel.org,
kernel-team@meta.com, leitao@kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Lukasz Luba, michal.simek@amd.com,
peng.fan@oss.nxp.com, Philip Radford, puranjay@kernel.org,
Souvik Chakravarty, sudeep.holla@kernel.org, usama.arif@linux.dev,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org
Hi Cristian,
The V10 multiplication and wire-payload boundary checks address the first
notification issue I reported in V7.
The decoded report sizing issue appears to remain.
tlm_events[] still declares:
.max_payld_sz = 0,
.max_report_sz = 0,
so the generic code allocates max_msg_size for the decoded report.
However, struct scmi_telemetry_update_report has a larger fixed header than
the wire payload because it also contains ktime_t.
A maximum-sized valid wire payload can therefore require more than
max_msg_size once decoded, even though the wire message itself passed the
transport-size check. The comment in fill_custom_report() that both objects
are max_msg_size does not account for this header-size difference.
Please either allocate a report large enough for the decoded header plus
the maximum dword array, or constrain num_dwords using the actual decoded
report-buffer capacity before copying.
Thanks,
Fayçal
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-08-21 15:21 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <<20260815232604.3730754-12-cristian.marussi@arm.com>
2026-08-21 15:20 ` [PATCH v10 11/24] firmware: arm_scmi: Add Telemetry notification support Fayssal Benmlih
2026-08-15 23:25 [PATCH v10 00/24] Introduce SCMI Telemetry support Cristian Marussi
2026-08-15 23:25 ` [PATCH v10 11/24] firmware: arm_scmi: Add Telemetry notification support Cristian Marussi
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox