[PATCH V2 0/7] arm64/hw_breakpoint: Enable FEAT_Debugv8p9

[PATCH V2 0/7] arm64/hw_breakpoint: Enable FEAT_Debugv8p9

[Anshuman Khandual]

This series enables FEAT_Debugv8p9 thus extending breakpoint and watchpoint
support upto 64. This series is based on v6.12-rc5 although this depends on
FEAT_FGT2 FGU series posted earlier, for MDSELR_EL1 handling in various KVM
guest configurations.

https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241001024356.1096072-1-anshuman.khandual@arm.com/

Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Changes in V2:

Following changes have been made per review comments from Mark Rutland

- Orr MDCR_EL2_EBWE directly without an intermittent register
- Alphabetically order header files in debug-monitors.c
- Dropped embwe_ref_count mechanism
- Dropped preempt_enable() from AARCH64_DBG_READ
- Dropped preempt_disable() from AARCH64_DBG_WRITE
- Dropped set_bank_index()
- Renamed read/write_wb_reg() as __read/__write_wb_reg()
- Modified read/write_wb_reg() to have MDSELR_E1 based banked read/write
- Added required sysreg tools patches from KVM FEAT_FGT2 series for build

Changes in V1:

https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241001043602.1116991-1-anshuman.khandual@arm.com/

- Changed FTR_STRICT to FTR_NONSTRICT for the following ID_AA64DFR1_EL1
  register fields - ABL_CMPs, DPFZS, PMICNTR, CTX_CMPs, WRPs and BRPs

Changes in RFC V2:

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20240620092607.267132-1-anshuman.khandual@arm.com/

- This series has been split from RFC V1 dealing only with arm64 breakpoints
- Restored back DBG_MDSCR_MASK definition (unrelated change)
- Added preempt_disable()/enable() blocks between selecting banks and registers

Changes in RFC:

https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240405080008.1225223-1-anshuman.khandual@arm.com/

Anshuman Khandual (7):
  arm64/sysreg: Update register fields for ID_AA64MMFR0_EL1
  arm64/sysreg: Add register fields for MDSELR_EL1
  arm64/sysreg: Add register fields for HDFGRTR2_EL2
  arm64/sysreg: Add register fields for HDFGWTR2_EL2
  arm64/cpufeature: Add field details for ID_AA64DFR1_EL1 register
  arm64/boot: Enable EL2 requirements for FEAT_Debugv8p9
  arm64/hw_breakpoint: Enable FEAT_Debugv8p9

 Documentation/arch/arm64/booting.rst    | 19 +++++++
 arch/arm64/include/asm/debug-monitors.h |  1 +
 arch/arm64/include/asm/el2_setup.h      | 26 +++++++++
 arch/arm64/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h  | 46 ++++++++++++----
 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h        |  1 +
 arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c          | 21 ++++++--
 arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c      | 15 ++++--
 arch/arm64/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c       | 38 +++++++++++++-
 arch/arm64/tools/sysreg                 | 70 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
 9 files changed, 216 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

-- 
2.25.1

[PATCH V2 1/7] arm64/sysreg: Update register fields for ID_AA64MMFR0_EL1

[Anshuman Khandual]

This updates ID_AA64MMFR0_EL1 register fields as per the definitions based
on DDI0601 2024-09.

Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
---
 arch/arm64/tools/sysreg | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/tools/sysreg b/arch/arm64/tools/sysreg
index 8d637ac4b7c6..41b0e54515eb 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/tools/sysreg
+++ b/arch/arm64/tools/sysreg
@@ -1556,6 +1556,7 @@ EndEnum
 UnsignedEnum	59:56	FGT
 	0b0000	NI
 	0b0001	IMP
+	0b0010	FGT2
 EndEnum
 Res0	55:48
 UnsignedEnum	47:44	EXS
@@ -1617,6 +1618,7 @@ Enum	3:0	PARANGE
 	0b0100	44
 	0b0101	48
 	0b0110	52
+	0b0111	56
 EndEnum
 EndSysreg
 
-- 
2.25.1

[PATCH V2 2/7] arm64/sysreg: Add register fields for MDSELR_EL1

[Anshuman Khandual]

This adds register fields for MDSELR_EL1 as per the definitions based
on DDI0601 2024-09.

Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
---
 arch/arm64/tools/sysreg | 11 +++++++++++
 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/tools/sysreg b/arch/arm64/tools/sysreg
index 41b0e54515eb..a92fc241fb4e 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/tools/sysreg
+++ b/arch/arm64/tools/sysreg
@@ -93,6 +93,17 @@ Res0	63:32
 Field	31:0	DTRTX
 EndSysreg
 
+Sysreg	MDSELR_EL1	2	0	0	4	2
+Res0	63:6
+Enum	5:4	BANK
+	0b00	BANK_0
+	0b01	BANK_1
+	0b10	BANK_2
+	0b11	BANK_3
+EndEnum
+Res0	3:0
+EndSysreg
+
 Sysreg	OSECCR_EL1	2	0	0	6	2
 Res0	63:32
 Field	31:0	EDECCR
-- 
2.25.1

[PATCH V2 3/7] arm64/sysreg: Add register fields for HDFGRTR2_EL2

[Anshuman Khandual]

This adds register fields for HDFGRTR2_EL2 as per the definitions based
on DDI0601 2024-09.

Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
---
 arch/arm64/tools/sysreg | 29 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 29 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/tools/sysreg b/arch/arm64/tools/sysreg
index a92fc241fb4e..1ee850b3e7a7 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/tools/sysreg
+++ b/arch/arm64/tools/sysreg
@@ -2476,6 +2476,35 @@ Field	1	ICIALLU
 Field	0	ICIALLUIS
 EndSysreg
 
+Sysreg HDFGRTR2_EL2	3	4	3	1	0
+Res0	63:25
+Field	24	nPMBMAR_EL1
+Field	23	nMDSTEPOP_EL1
+Field	22	nTRBMPAM_EL1
+Res0	21
+Field	20	nTRCITECR_EL1
+Field	19	nPMSDSFR_EL1
+Field	18	nSPMDEVAFF_EL1
+Field	17	nSPMID
+Field	16	nSPMSCR_EL1
+Field	15	nSPMACCESSR_EL1
+Field	14	nSPMCR_EL0
+Field	13	nSPMOVS
+Field	12	nSPMINTEN
+Field	11	nSPMCNTEN
+Field	10	nSPMSELR_EL0
+Field	9	nSPMEVTYPERn_EL0
+Field	8	nSPMEVCNTRn_EL0
+Field	7	nPMSSCR_EL1
+Field	6	nPMSSDATA
+Field	5	nMDSELR_EL1
+Field	4	nPMUACR_EL1
+Field	3	nPMICFILTR_EL0
+Field	2	nPMICNTR_EL0
+Field	1	nPMIAR_EL1
+Field	0	nPMECR_EL1
+EndSysreg
+
 Sysreg HDFGRTR_EL2	3	4	3	1	4
 Field	63	PMBIDR_EL1
 Field	62	nPMSNEVFR_EL1
-- 
2.25.1

[PATCH V2 4/7] arm64/sysreg: Add register fields for HDFGWTR2_EL2

[Anshuman Khandual]

This adds register fields for HDFGWTR2_EL2 as per the definitions based
on DDI0601 2024-09.

Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
---
 arch/arm64/tools/sysreg | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/tools/sysreg b/arch/arm64/tools/sysreg
index 1ee850b3e7a7..3e97af013ef7 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/tools/sysreg
+++ b/arch/arm64/tools/sysreg
@@ -2505,6 +2505,34 @@ Field	1	nPMIAR_EL1
 Field	0	nPMECR_EL1
 EndSysreg
 
+Sysreg HDFGWTR2_EL2	3	4	3	1	1
+Res0	63:25
+Field	24	nPMBMAR_EL1
+Field	23	nMDSTEPOP_EL1
+Field	22	nTRBMPAM_EL1
+Field	21	nPMZR_EL0
+Field	20	nTRCITECR_EL1
+Field	19	nPMSDSFR_EL1
+Res0	18:17
+Field	16	nSPMSCR_EL1
+Field	15	nSPMACCESSR_EL1
+Field	14	nSPMCR_EL0
+Field	13	nSPMOVS
+Field	12	nSPMINTEN
+Field	11	nSPMCNTEN
+Field	10	nSPMSELR_EL0
+Field	9	nSPMEVTYPERn_EL0
+Field	8	nSPMEVCNTRn_EL0
+Field	7	nPMSSCR_EL1
+Res0	6
+Field	5	nMDSELR_EL1
+Field	4	nPMUACR_EL1
+Field	3	nPMICFILTR_EL0
+Field	2	nPMICNTR_EL0
+Field	1	nPMIAR_EL1
+Field	0	nPMECR_EL1
+EndSysreg
+
 Sysreg HDFGRTR_EL2	3	4	3	1	4
 Field	63	PMBIDR_EL1
 Field	62	nPMSNEVFR_EL1
-- 
2.25.1

[PATCH V2 5/7] arm64/cpufeature: Add field details for ID_AA64DFR1_EL1 register

[Anshuman Khandual]

This adds required field details for ID_AA64DFR1_EL1, and also drops dummy
ftr_raz[] array which is now redundant. These register fields will be used
to enable increased breakpoint and watchpoint registers via FEAT_Debugv8p9
later.

Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
---
 arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
index 718728a85430..bd4d85f5dd92 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
@@ -530,6 +530,21 @@ static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_id_aa64dfr0[] = {
 	ARM64_FTR_END,
 };
 
+static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_id_aa64dfr1[] = {
+	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_NONSTRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64DFR1_EL1_ABL_CMPs_SHIFT, 8, 0),
+	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_NONSTRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64DFR1_EL1_DPFZS_SHIFT, 4, 0),
+	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64DFR1_EL1_EBEP_SHIFT, 4, 0),
+	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64DFR1_EL1_ITE_SHIFT, 4, 0),
+	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64DFR1_EL1_ABLE_SHIFT, 4, 0),
+	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_NONSTRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64DFR1_EL1_PMICNTR_SHIFT, 4, 0),
+	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64DFR1_EL1_SPMU_SHIFT, 4, 0),
+	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_NONSTRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64DFR1_EL1_CTX_CMPs_SHIFT, 8, 0),
+	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_NONSTRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64DFR1_EL1_WRPs_SHIFT, 8, 0),
+	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_NONSTRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64DFR1_EL1_BRPs_SHIFT, 8, 0),
+	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64DFR1_EL1_SYSPMUID_SHIFT, 8, 0),
+	ARM64_FTR_END,
+};
+
 static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_mvfr0[] = {
 	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, MVFR0_EL1_FPRound_SHIFT, 4, 0),
 	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, MVFR0_EL1_FPShVec_SHIFT, 4, 0),
@@ -708,10 +723,6 @@ static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_single32[] = {
 	ARM64_FTR_END,
 };
 
-static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_raz[] = {
-	ARM64_FTR_END,
-};
-
 #define __ARM64_FTR_REG_OVERRIDE(id_str, id, table, ovr) {	\
 		.sys_id = id,					\
 		.reg = 	&(struct arm64_ftr_reg){		\
@@ -784,7 +795,7 @@ static const struct __ftr_reg_entry {
 
 	/* Op1 = 0, CRn = 0, CRm = 5 */
 	ARM64_FTR_REG(SYS_ID_AA64DFR0_EL1, ftr_id_aa64dfr0),
-	ARM64_FTR_REG(SYS_ID_AA64DFR1_EL1, ftr_raz),
+	ARM64_FTR_REG(SYS_ID_AA64DFR1_EL1, ftr_id_aa64dfr1),
 
 	/* Op1 = 0, CRn = 0, CRm = 6 */
 	ARM64_FTR_REG(SYS_ID_AA64ISAR0_EL1, ftr_id_aa64isar0),
-- 
2.25.1

[PATCH V2 6/7] arm64/boot: Enable EL2 requirements for FEAT_Debugv8p9

[Anshuman Khandual]

Fine grained trap control for MDSELR_EL1 register needs to be configured in
HDFGRTR2_EL2, and HDFGWTR2_EL2 registers when kernel enters at EL1, but EL2
is also present. This adds a new helper __init_el2_fgt2() initializing this
new FEAT_FGT2 based fine grained registers.

MDCR_EL2.EBWE needs to be enabled for additional (beyond 16) breakpoint and
watchpoint exceptions when kernel enters at EL1, but EL2 is also present.
This updates __init_el2_debug() as required for FEAT_Debugv8p9.

While here, also update booting.rst with MDCR_EL3 and SCR_EL3 requirements.

Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
---
Changes in V2:

- Orr MDCR_EL2_EBWE directly without an intermittent register

 Documentation/arch/arm64/booting.rst | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
 arch/arm64/include/asm/el2_setup.h   | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h     |  1 +
 3 files changed, 46 insertions(+)

diff --git a/Documentation/arch/arm64/booting.rst b/Documentation/arch/arm64/booting.rst
index b57776a68f15..e69d972018cf 100644
--- a/Documentation/arch/arm64/booting.rst
+++ b/Documentation/arch/arm64/booting.rst
@@ -285,6 +285,12 @@ Before jumping into the kernel, the following conditions must be met:
 
     - SCR_EL3.FGTEn (bit 27) must be initialised to 0b1.
 
+  For CPUs with the Fine Grained Traps (FEAT_FGT2) extension present:
+
+  - If EL3 is present and the kernel is entered at EL2:
+
+    - SCR_EL3.FGTEn2 (bit 59) must be initialised to 0b1.
+
   For CPUs with support for HCRX_EL2 (FEAT_HCX) present:
 
   - If EL3 is present and the kernel is entered at EL2:
@@ -319,6 +325,19 @@ Before jumping into the kernel, the following conditions must be met:
     - ZCR_EL2.LEN must be initialised to the same value for all CPUs the
       kernel will execute on.
 
+  For CPUs with FEAT_Debugv8p9 extension present:
+
+  - If the kernel is entered at EL1 and EL2 is present:
+
+    - HDFGRTR2_EL2.nMDSELR_EL1 (bit 5) must be initialized to 0b1
+    - HDFGWTR2_EL2.nMDSELR_EL1 (bit 5) must be initialized to 0b1
+    - MDCR_EL2.EBWE (bit 43) must be initialized to 0b1
+
+  - If EL3 is present:
+
+    - MDCR_EL3.TDA (bit 9) must be initialized to 0b0
+    - MDCR_EL3.EBWE (bit 43) must be initialized to 0b1
+
   For CPUs with the Scalable Matrix Extension (FEAT_SME):
 
   - If EL3 is present:
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/el2_setup.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/el2_setup.h
index e0ffdf13a18b..289e9d8f8ee6 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/el2_setup.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/el2_setup.h
@@ -97,6 +97,13 @@
 						// to own it.
 
 .Lskip_trace_\@:
+	mrs	x1, id_aa64dfr0_el1
+	ubfx	x1, x1, #ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_DebugVer_SHIFT, #4
+	cmp	x1, #ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_DebugVer_V8P9
+	b.lt	.Lskip_dbg_v8p9_\@
+
+	orr	x2, x2, #MDCR_EL2_EBWE
+.Lskip_dbg_v8p9_\@:
 	msr	mdcr_el2, x2			// Configure debug traps
 .endm
 
@@ -215,6 +222,24 @@
 .Lskip_fgt_\@:
 .endm
 
+.macro __init_el2_fgt2
+	mrs	x1, id_aa64mmfr0_el1
+	ubfx	x1, x1, #ID_AA64MMFR0_EL1_FGT_SHIFT, #4
+	cmp	x1, #ID_AA64MMFR0_EL1_FGT_FGT2
+	b.lt	.Lskip_fgt2_\@
+
+	mrs	x1, id_aa64dfr0_el1
+	ubfx	x1, x1, #ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_DebugVer_SHIFT, #4
+	cmp	x1, #ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_DebugVer_V8P9
+	b.lt	.Lskip_dbg_v8p9_\@
+
+	mov_q   x0, HDFGWTR2_EL2_nMDSELR_EL1
+	msr_s	SYS_HDFGWTR2_EL2, x0
+	msr_s	SYS_HDFGRTR2_EL2, x0
+.Lskip_dbg_v8p9_\@:
+.Lskip_fgt2_\@:
+.endm
+
 .macro __init_el2_nvhe_prepare_eret
 	mov	x0, #INIT_PSTATE_EL1
 	msr	spsr_el2, x0
@@ -240,6 +265,7 @@
 	__init_el2_nvhe_idregs
 	__init_el2_cptr
 	__init_el2_fgt
+	__init_el2_fgt2
 .endm
 
 #ifndef __KVM_NVHE_HYPERVISOR__
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h
index 109a85ee6910..34936f550118 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h
@@ -312,6 +312,7 @@
 				 GENMASK(15, 0))
 
 /* Hyp Debug Configuration Register bits */
+#define MDCR_EL2_EBWE		(UL(1) << 43)
 #define MDCR_EL2_E2TB_MASK	(UL(0x3))
 #define MDCR_EL2_E2TB_SHIFT	(UL(24))
 #define MDCR_EL2_HPMFZS		(UL(1) << 36)
-- 
2.25.1

[PATCH V2 7/7] arm64/hw_breakpoint: Enable FEAT_Debugv8p9

[Anshuman Khandual]

Currently there can be maximum 16 breakpoints, and 16 watchpoints available
on a given platform - as detected from ID_AA64DFR0_EL1.[BRPs|WRPs] register
fields. But these breakpoint, and watchpoints can be extended further up to
64 via a new arch feature FEAT_Debugv8p9.

This first enables banked access for the breakpoint and watchpoint register
set via MDSELR_EL1, extended exceptions via MDSCR_EL1.EMBWE and determining
available breakpoints and watchpoints in the platform from ID_AA64DFR1_EL1,
when FEAT_Debugv8p9 is enabled.

Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
---
Changes in V2:

- Alphabetically order header files in debug-monitors.c
- Dropped embwe_ref_count mechanism
- Dropped preempt_enable() from AARCH64_DBG_READ
- Dropped preempt_disable() from AARCH64_DBG_WRITE
- Dropped set_bank_index()
- Renamed read/write_wb_reg() as __read/__write_wb_reg()
- Modified read/write_wb_reg() to have MDSELR_E1 based banked read/write

 arch/arm64/include/asm/debug-monitors.h |  1 +
 arch/arm64/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h  | 46 +++++++++++++++++++------
 arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c      | 15 +++++---
 arch/arm64/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c       | 38 ++++++++++++++++++--
 4 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/debug-monitors.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/debug-monitors.h
index 13d437bcbf58..a14097673ae0 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/debug-monitors.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/debug-monitors.h
@@ -20,6 +20,7 @@
 #define DBG_MDSCR_KDE		(1 << 13)
 #define DBG_MDSCR_MDE		(1 << 15)
 #define DBG_MDSCR_MASK		~(DBG_MDSCR_KDE | DBG_MDSCR_MDE)
+#define DBG_MDSCR_EMBWE		(1UL << 32)
 
 #define	DBG_ESR_EVT(x)		(((x) >> 27) & 0x7)
 
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h
index bd81cf17744a..ec7c7901c61a 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h
@@ -79,8 +79,8 @@ static inline void decode_ctrl_reg(u32 reg,
  * Limits.
  * Changing these will require modifications to the register accessors.
  */
-#define ARM_MAX_BRP		16
-#define ARM_MAX_WRP		16
+#define ARM_MAX_BRP		64
+#define ARM_MAX_WRP		64
 
 /* Virtual debug register bases. */
 #define AARCH64_DBG_REG_BVR	0
@@ -94,6 +94,14 @@ static inline void decode_ctrl_reg(u32 reg,
 #define AARCH64_DBG_REG_NAME_WVR	wvr
 #define AARCH64_DBG_REG_NAME_WCR	wcr
 
+static inline bool is_debug_v8p9_enabled(void)
+{
+	u64 dfr0 = read_sanitised_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_AA64DFR0_EL1);
+	int dver = cpuid_feature_extract_unsigned_field(dfr0, ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_DebugVer_SHIFT);
+
+	return dver == ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_DebugVer_V8P9;
+}
+
 /* Accessor macros for the debug registers. */
 #define AARCH64_DBG_READ(N, REG, VAL) do {\
 	VAL = read_sysreg(dbg##REG##N##_el1);\
@@ -138,19 +146,37 @@ static inline void ptrace_hw_copy_thread(struct task_struct *task)
 /* Determine number of BRP registers available. */
 static inline int get_num_brps(void)
 {
-	u64 dfr0 = read_sanitised_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_AA64DFR0_EL1);
-	return 1 +
-		cpuid_feature_extract_unsigned_field(dfr0,
-						ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_BRPs_SHIFT);
+	u64 dfr0, dfr1;
+	int dver, brps;
+
+	dfr0 = read_sanitised_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_AA64DFR0_EL1);
+	dver = cpuid_feature_extract_unsigned_field(dfr0, ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_DebugVer_SHIFT);
+	if (dver == ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_DebugVer_V8P9) {
+		dfr1 = read_sanitised_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_AA64DFR1_EL1);
+		brps = cpuid_feature_extract_unsigned_field_width(dfr1,
+								  ID_AA64DFR1_EL1_BRPs_SHIFT, 8);
+	} else {
+		brps = cpuid_feature_extract_unsigned_field(dfr0, ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_BRPs_SHIFT);
+	}
+	return 1 + brps;
 }
 
 /* Determine number of WRP registers available. */
 static inline int get_num_wrps(void)
 {
-	u64 dfr0 = read_sanitised_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_AA64DFR0_EL1);
-	return 1 +
-		cpuid_feature_extract_unsigned_field(dfr0,
-						ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_WRPs_SHIFT);
+	u64 dfr0, dfr1;
+	int dver, wrps;
+
+	dfr0 = read_sanitised_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_AA64DFR0_EL1);
+	dver = cpuid_feature_extract_unsigned_field(dfr0, ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_DebugVer_SHIFT);
+	if (dver == ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_DebugVer_V8P9) {
+		dfr1 = read_sanitised_ftr_reg(SYS_ID_AA64DFR1_EL1);
+		wrps = cpuid_feature_extract_unsigned_field_width(dfr1,
+								  ID_AA64DFR1_EL1_WRPs_SHIFT, 8);
+	} else {
+		wrps = cpuid_feature_extract_unsigned_field(dfr0, ID_AA64DFR0_EL1_WRPs_SHIFT);
+	}
+	return 1 + wrps;
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_CPU_PM
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c
index 024a7b245056..b56716c654d8 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c
@@ -21,6 +21,7 @@
 #include <asm/cputype.h>
 #include <asm/daifflags.h>
 #include <asm/debug-monitors.h>
+#include <asm/hw_breakpoint.h>
 #include <asm/system_misc.h>
 #include <asm/traps.h>
 
@@ -34,7 +35,7 @@ u8 debug_monitors_arch(void)
 /*
  * MDSCR access routines.
  */
-static void mdscr_write(u32 mdscr)
+static void mdscr_write(u64 mdscr)
 {
 	unsigned long flags;
 	flags = local_daif_save();
@@ -43,7 +44,7 @@ static void mdscr_write(u32 mdscr)
 }
 NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(mdscr_write);
 
-static u32 mdscr_read(void)
+static u64 mdscr_read(void)
 {
 	return read_sysreg(mdscr_el1);
 }
@@ -79,7 +80,7 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, kde_ref_count);
 
 void enable_debug_monitors(enum dbg_active_el el)
 {
-	u32 mdscr, enable = 0;
+	u64 mdscr, enable = 0;
 
 	WARN_ON(preemptible());
 
@@ -90,6 +91,9 @@ void enable_debug_monitors(enum dbg_active_el el)
 	    this_cpu_inc_return(kde_ref_count) == 1)
 		enable |= DBG_MDSCR_KDE;
 
+	if (is_debug_v8p9_enabled())
+		enable |= DBG_MDSCR_EMBWE;
+
 	if (enable && debug_enabled) {
 		mdscr = mdscr_read();
 		mdscr |= enable;
@@ -100,7 +104,7 @@ NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(enable_debug_monitors);
 
 void disable_debug_monitors(enum dbg_active_el el)
 {
-	u32 mdscr, disable = 0;
+	u64 mdscr, disable = 0;
 
 	WARN_ON(preemptible());
 
@@ -111,6 +115,9 @@ void disable_debug_monitors(enum dbg_active_el el)
 	    this_cpu_dec_return(kde_ref_count) == 0)
 		disable &= ~DBG_MDSCR_KDE;
 
+	if (is_debug_v8p9_enabled())
+		disable &= ~DBG_MDSCR_EMBWE;
+
 	if (disable) {
 		mdscr = mdscr_read();
 		mdscr &= disable;
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
index 722ac45f9f7b..630db607ca2b 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c
@@ -103,7 +103,7 @@ int hw_breakpoint_slots(int type)
 	WRITE_WB_REG_CASE(OFF, 14, REG, VAL);	\
 	WRITE_WB_REG_CASE(OFF, 15, REG, VAL)
 
-static u64 read_wb_reg(int reg, int n)
+static u64 __read_wb_reg(int reg, int n)
 {
 	u64 val = 0;
 
@@ -118,9 +118,27 @@ static u64 read_wb_reg(int reg, int n)
 
 	return val;
 }
+
+static u64 read_wb_reg(int reg, int n)
+{
+	int mdsel_bank, index;
+	u64 val;
+
+	if (!is_debug_v8p9_enabled())
+		return __read_wb_reg(reg, n);
+
+	mdsel_bank = n / 16;
+	index = n % 16;
+	preempt_disable();
+	write_sysreg_s(mdsel_bank << MDSELR_EL1_BANK_SHIFT, SYS_MDSELR_EL1);
+	isb();
+	val = __read_wb_reg(reg, index);
+	preempt_enable();
+	return val;
+}
 NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(read_wb_reg);
 
-static void write_wb_reg(int reg, int n, u64 val)
+static void __write_wb_reg(int reg, int n, u64 val)
 {
 	switch (reg + n) {
 	GEN_WRITE_WB_REG_CASES(AARCH64_DBG_REG_BVR, AARCH64_DBG_REG_NAME_BVR, val);
@@ -132,6 +150,22 @@ static void write_wb_reg(int reg, int n, u64 val)
 	}
 	isb();
 }
+
+static void write_wb_reg(int reg, int n, u64 val)
+{
+	int mdsel_bank, index;
+
+	if (!is_debug_v8p9_enabled())
+		return __write_wb_reg(reg, n, val);
+
+	mdsel_bank = n / 16;
+	index = n % 16;
+	preempt_disable();
+	write_sysreg_s(mdsel_bank << MDSELR_EL1_BANK_SHIFT, SYS_MDSELR_EL1);
+	isb();
+	__write_wb_reg(reg, index, val);
+	preempt_enable();
+}
 NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(write_wb_reg);
 
 /*
-- 
2.25.1

Re: [PATCH V2 5/7] arm64/cpufeature: Add field details for ID_AA64DFR1_EL1 register

[Will Deacon]

On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 11:04:24AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> This adds required field details for ID_AA64DFR1_EL1, and also drops dummy
> ftr_raz[] array which is now redundant. These register fields will be used
> to enable increased breakpoint and watchpoint registers via FEAT_Debugv8p9
> later.
> 
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++-----
>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> index 718728a85430..bd4d85f5dd92 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> @@ -530,6 +530,21 @@ static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_id_aa64dfr0[] = {
>  	ARM64_FTR_END,
>  };
>  
> +static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_id_aa64dfr1[] = {
> +	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_NONSTRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64DFR1_EL1_ABL_CMPs_SHIFT, 8, 0),
> +	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_NONSTRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64DFR1_EL1_DPFZS_SHIFT, 4, 0),
> +	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64DFR1_EL1_EBEP_SHIFT, 4, 0),
> +	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64DFR1_EL1_ITE_SHIFT, 4, 0),
> +	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64DFR1_EL1_ABLE_SHIFT, 4, 0),
> +	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_NONSTRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64DFR1_EL1_PMICNTR_SHIFT, 4, 0),
> +	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64DFR1_EL1_SPMU_SHIFT, 4, 0),
> +	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_NONSTRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64DFR1_EL1_CTX_CMPs_SHIFT, 8, 0),
> +	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_NONSTRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64DFR1_EL1_WRPs_SHIFT, 8, 0),
> +	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_NONSTRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64DFR1_EL1_BRPs_SHIFT, 8, 0),
> +	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64DFR1_EL1_SYSPMUID_SHIFT, 8, 0),
> +	ARM64_FTR_END,
> +};

I think I mentioned this on an earlier series, but it would be useful to
see some justification in the commit message as to why some of these
features are considered STRICT vs NONSTRICT and why LOWER_SAFE is
preferred over EXACT.

For example, why is EBEP strict whereas other PMU-related fields aren't?
Why is the CTX_CMPs field treated differently to the same field in DFR0?

I'm not saying the above table is wrong, it just looks arbitrary without
the justification.

Will

Re: [PATCH V2 5/7] arm64/cpufeature: Add field details for ID_AA64DFR1_EL1 register

[Mark Rutland]

On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 04:41:44PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 11:04:24AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> > +static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_id_aa64dfr1[] = {
> > +	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_NONSTRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64DFR1_EL1_ABL_CMPs_SHIFT, 8, 0),
> > +	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_NONSTRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64DFR1_EL1_DPFZS_SHIFT, 4, 0),
> > +	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64DFR1_EL1_EBEP_SHIFT, 4, 0),
> > +	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64DFR1_EL1_ITE_SHIFT, 4, 0),
> > +	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64DFR1_EL1_ABLE_SHIFT, 4, 0),
> > +	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_NONSTRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64DFR1_EL1_PMICNTR_SHIFT, 4, 0),
> > +	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64DFR1_EL1_SPMU_SHIFT, 4, 0),
> > +	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_NONSTRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64DFR1_EL1_CTX_CMPs_SHIFT, 8, 0),
> > +	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_NONSTRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64DFR1_EL1_WRPs_SHIFT, 8, 0),
> > +	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_NONSTRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64DFR1_EL1_BRPs_SHIFT, 8, 0),
> > +	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64DFR1_EL1_SYSPMUID_SHIFT, 8, 0),
> > +	ARM64_FTR_END,
> > +};
> 
> I think I mentioned this on an earlier series, but it would be useful to
> see some justification in the commit message as to why some of these
> features are considered STRICT vs NONSTRICT and why LOWER_SAFE is
> preferred over EXACT.
> 
> For example, why is EBEP strict whereas other PMU-related fields aren't?
> Why is the CTX_CMPs field treated differently to the same field in DFR0?
> 
> I'm not saying the above table is wrong, it just looks arbitrary without
> the justification.

FWIW, Anshuman and I discussed that on the v1 thread, after this v2
thread was posted. Anshuman promised to provide some rationale and make
some updates in the next version (i.e. v3):

  https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/8efe902c-8b9f-494a-b9da-430d8ced32ef@arm.com/

Mark.

Re: [PATCH V2 0/7] arm64/hw_breakpoint: Enable FEAT_Debugv8p9

[Mark Rutland]

On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 11:04:19AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> This series enables FEAT_Debugv8p9 thus extending breakpoint and watchpoint
> support upto 64. This series is based on v6.12-rc5 although this depends on
> FEAT_FGT2 FGU series posted earlier, for MDSELR_EL1 handling in various KVM
> guest configurations.
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241001024356.1096072-1-anshuman.khandual@arm.com/

To avoid further confusion: since we discussed things further on the v1
thread after this v2 thread was posted, I'm waiting for a v3 to be
posted which addresses the comments there (e.g. ID reg field handling,
mutual exclusion for breakpoint manipulation).

Mark.

> Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> Cc: Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>
> Cc: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
> Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> Cc: kvmarm@lists.linux.dev
> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> 
> Changes in V2:
> 
> Following changes have been made per review comments from Mark Rutland
> 
> - Orr MDCR_EL2_EBWE directly without an intermittent register
> - Alphabetically order header files in debug-monitors.c
> - Dropped embwe_ref_count mechanism
> - Dropped preempt_enable() from AARCH64_DBG_READ
> - Dropped preempt_disable() from AARCH64_DBG_WRITE
> - Dropped set_bank_index()
> - Renamed read/write_wb_reg() as __read/__write_wb_reg()
> - Modified read/write_wb_reg() to have MDSELR_E1 based banked read/write
> - Added required sysreg tools patches from KVM FEAT_FGT2 series for build
> 
> Changes in V1:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241001043602.1116991-1-anshuman.khandual@arm.com/
> 
> - Changed FTR_STRICT to FTR_NONSTRICT for the following ID_AA64DFR1_EL1
>   register fields - ABL_CMPs, DPFZS, PMICNTR, CTX_CMPs, WRPs and BRPs
> 
> Changes in RFC V2:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20240620092607.267132-1-anshuman.khandual@arm.com/
> 
> - This series has been split from RFC V1 dealing only with arm64 breakpoints
> - Restored back DBG_MDSCR_MASK definition (unrelated change)
> - Added preempt_disable()/enable() blocks between selecting banks and registers
> 
> Changes in RFC:
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240405080008.1225223-1-anshuman.khandual@arm.com/
> 
> Anshuman Khandual (7):
>   arm64/sysreg: Update register fields for ID_AA64MMFR0_EL1
>   arm64/sysreg: Add register fields for MDSELR_EL1
>   arm64/sysreg: Add register fields for HDFGRTR2_EL2
>   arm64/sysreg: Add register fields for HDFGWTR2_EL2
>   arm64/cpufeature: Add field details for ID_AA64DFR1_EL1 register
>   arm64/boot: Enable EL2 requirements for FEAT_Debugv8p9
>   arm64/hw_breakpoint: Enable FEAT_Debugv8p9
> 
>  Documentation/arch/arm64/booting.rst    | 19 +++++++
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/debug-monitors.h |  1 +
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/el2_setup.h      | 26 +++++++++
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/hw_breakpoint.h  | 46 ++++++++++++----
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_arm.h        |  1 +
>  arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c          | 21 ++++++--
>  arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c      | 15 ++++--
>  arch/arm64/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c       | 38 +++++++++++++-
>  arch/arm64/tools/sysreg                 | 70 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  9 files changed, 216 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> 2.25.1
> 

Re: [PATCH V2 5/7] arm64/cpufeature: Add field details for ID_AA64DFR1_EL1 register

[Will Deacon]

On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 04:56:25PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 04:41:44PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 11:04:24AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> > > +static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_id_aa64dfr1[] = {
> > > +	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_NONSTRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64DFR1_EL1_ABL_CMPs_SHIFT, 8, 0),
> > > +	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_NONSTRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64DFR1_EL1_DPFZS_SHIFT, 4, 0),
> > > +	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64DFR1_EL1_EBEP_SHIFT, 4, 0),
> > > +	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64DFR1_EL1_ITE_SHIFT, 4, 0),
> > > +	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64DFR1_EL1_ABLE_SHIFT, 4, 0),
> > > +	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_NONSTRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64DFR1_EL1_PMICNTR_SHIFT, 4, 0),
> > > +	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64DFR1_EL1_SPMU_SHIFT, 4, 0),
> > > +	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_NONSTRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64DFR1_EL1_CTX_CMPs_SHIFT, 8, 0),
> > > +	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_NONSTRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64DFR1_EL1_WRPs_SHIFT, 8, 0),
> > > +	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_NONSTRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64DFR1_EL1_BRPs_SHIFT, 8, 0),
> > > +	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64DFR1_EL1_SYSPMUID_SHIFT, 8, 0),
> > > +	ARM64_FTR_END,
> > > +};
> > 
> > I think I mentioned this on an earlier series, but it would be useful to
> > see some justification in the commit message as to why some of these
> > features are considered STRICT vs NONSTRICT and why LOWER_SAFE is
> > preferred over EXACT.
> > 
> > For example, why is EBEP strict whereas other PMU-related fields aren't?
> > Why is the CTX_CMPs field treated differently to the same field in DFR0?
> > 
> > I'm not saying the above table is wrong, it just looks arbitrary without
> > the justification.
> 
> FWIW, Anshuman and I discussed that on the v1 thread, after this v2
> thread was posted. Anshuman promised to provide some rationale and make
> some updates in the next version (i.e. v3):
> 
>   https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/8efe902c-8b9f-494a-b9da-430d8ced32ef@arm.com/

Perfect! I'll wait for the v3, then.

Will

Re: [PATCH V2 5/7] arm64/cpufeature: Add field details for ID_AA64DFR1_EL1 register

[Anshuman Khandual]

On 12/10/24 22:11, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 11:04:24AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>> This adds required field details for ID_AA64DFR1_EL1, and also drops dummy
>> ftr_raz[] array which is now redundant. These register fields will be used
>> to enable increased breakpoint and watchpoint registers via FEAT_Debugv8p9
>> later.
>>
>> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
>> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
>> cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
>> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
>> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
>> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
>> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++-----
>>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
>> index 718728a85430..bd4d85f5dd92 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
>> @@ -530,6 +530,21 @@ static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_id_aa64dfr0[] = {
>>  	ARM64_FTR_END,
>>  };
>>  
>> +static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_id_aa64dfr1[] = {
>> +	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_NONSTRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64DFR1_EL1_ABL_CMPs_SHIFT, 8, 0),
>> +	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_NONSTRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64DFR1_EL1_DPFZS_SHIFT, 4, 0),
>> +	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64DFR1_EL1_EBEP_SHIFT, 4, 0),
>> +	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64DFR1_EL1_ITE_SHIFT, 4, 0),
>> +	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64DFR1_EL1_ABLE_SHIFT, 4, 0),
>> +	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_NONSTRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64DFR1_EL1_PMICNTR_SHIFT, 4, 0),
>> +	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64DFR1_EL1_SPMU_SHIFT, 4, 0),
>> +	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_NONSTRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64DFR1_EL1_CTX_CMPs_SHIFT, 8, 0),
>> +	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_NONSTRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64DFR1_EL1_WRPs_SHIFT, 8, 0),
>> +	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_NONSTRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64DFR1_EL1_BRPs_SHIFT, 8, 0),
>> +	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64DFR1_EL1_SYSPMUID_SHIFT, 8, 0),
>> +	ARM64_FTR_END,
>> +};
> 
> I think I mentioned this on an earlier series, but it would be useful to
> see some justification in the commit message as to why some of these
> features are considered STRICT vs NONSTRICT and why LOWER_SAFE is
> preferred over EXACT.

I have updated the commit message regarding STRICT vs NONSTRICT as Mark had
mentioned earlier (see below). But just wondering about FTR_LOWER_SAFE. All
similar fields have been marked as FTR_LOWER_SAFE.

> 
> For example, why is EBEP strict whereas other PMU-related fields aren't?

IIUC there are two types of fields here.

- Feature presence     (EBEP, ITE, ABLE etc)		---> FTR_STRICT
- Debug resource count (WRPs, BRPs, CTX_CMPs etc)	---> FTR_NONSTRICT

> Why is the CTX_CMPs field treated differently to the same field in DFR0?

There is mismatch not only for CTX_CMPs but for WRPs and BRPs as well. As
mentioned earlier, being resource count type, I believe these should be
marked as FTR_NONSTRICT in existing DFR0 as well. I could send a patch
fixing DFR0 first.

> 
> I'm not saying the above table is wrong, it just looks arbitrary without
> the justification.

Please find the updated version (v3) for this patch here for reference.

--------------
[PATCH] arm64/cpufeature: Add field details for ID_AA64DFR1_EL1 register

This adds required field details for ID_AA64DFR1_EL1, and also drops dummy
ftr_raz[] array which is now redundant. These register fields will be used
to enable increased breakpoint and watchpoint registers via FEAT_Debugv8p9
later. The register fields have been marked as FTR_STRICT, unless there is
a known variation in practice.

Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
---
 arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
index 6ce71f444ed8..0dc22fde104e 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
@@ -534,6 +534,21 @@ static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_id_aa64dfr0[] = {
 	ARM64_FTR_END,
 };
 
+static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_id_aa64dfr1[] = {
+	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_NONSTRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64DFR1_EL1_ABL_CMPs_SHIFT, 8, 0),
+	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_NONSTRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64DFR1_EL1_DPFZS_SHIFT, 4, 0),
+	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64DFR1_EL1_EBEP_SHIFT, 4, 0),
+	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64DFR1_EL1_ITE_SHIFT, 4, 0),
+	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_NONSTRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64DFR1_EL1_ABLE_SHIFT, 4, 0),
+	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_NONSTRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64DFR1_EL1_PMICNTR_SHIFT, 4, 0),
+	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64DFR1_EL1_SPMU_SHIFT, 4, 0),
+	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_NONSTRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64DFR1_EL1_CTX_CMPs_SHIFT, 8, 0),
+	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_NONSTRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64DFR1_EL1_WRPs_SHIFT, 8, 0),
+	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_NONSTRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64DFR1_EL1_BRPs_SHIFT, 8, 0),
+	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64DFR1_EL1_SYSPMUID_SHIFT, 8, 0),
+	ARM64_FTR_END,
+};
+
 static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_mvfr0[] = {
 	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, MVFR0_EL1_FPRound_SHIFT, 4, 0),
 	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, MVFR0_EL1_FPShVec_SHIFT, 4, 0),
@@ -720,10 +735,6 @@ static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_single32[] = {
 	ARM64_FTR_END,
 };
 
-static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_raz[] = {
-	ARM64_FTR_END,
-};
-
 #define __ARM64_FTR_REG_OVERRIDE(id_str, id, table, ovr) {	\
 		.sys_id = id,					\
 		.reg = 	&(struct arm64_ftr_reg){		\
@@ -796,7 +807,7 @@ static const struct __ftr_reg_entry {
 
 	/* Op1 = 0, CRn = 0, CRm = 5 */
 	ARM64_FTR_REG(SYS_ID_AA64DFR0_EL1, ftr_id_aa64dfr0),
-	ARM64_FTR_REG(SYS_ID_AA64DFR1_EL1, ftr_raz),
+	ARM64_FTR_REG(SYS_ID_AA64DFR1_EL1, ftr_id_aa64dfr1),
 
 	/* Op1 = 0, CRn = 0, CRm = 6 */
 	ARM64_FTR_REG(SYS_ID_AA64ISAR0_EL1, ftr_id_aa64isar0),
-- 
2.25.1
--------------
Changes in V3:
 
- Updated commit message regarding FTR_STRICT
- Updated ID_AA64DFR1_EL1.ABLE as FTR_NONSTRICT

Re: [PATCH V2 0/7] arm64/hw_breakpoint: Enable FEAT_Debugv8p9

[Anshuman Khandual]

On 12/10/24 22:29, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 11:04:19AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>> This series enables FEAT_Debugv8p9 thus extending breakpoint and watchpoint
>> support upto 64. This series is based on v6.12-rc5 although this depends on
>> FEAT_FGT2 FGU series posted earlier, for MDSELR_EL1 handling in various KVM
>> guest configurations.
>>
>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241001024356.1096072-1-anshuman.khandual@arm.com/
> To avoid further confusion: since we discussed things further on the v1
> thread after this v2 thread was posted, I'm waiting for a v3 to be
> posted which addresses the comments there (e.g. ID reg field handling,
> mutual exclusion for breakpoint manipulation).

Agreed, although I am still working on the mutual exclusion for breakpoint
manipulation problem. Besides just carved out - MDCR_EL3.[TDS|TPM] related
EL3 boot requirement's document update in a separate series as discussed.

https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241211065425.1106683-1-anshuman.khandual@arm.com/

Re: [PATCH V2 5/7] arm64/cpufeature: Add field details for ID_AA64DFR1_EL1 register

[Will Deacon]

On Wed, Dec 11, 2024 at 10:02:42AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> 
> 
> On 12/10/24 22:11, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 11:04:24AM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
> >> This adds required field details for ID_AA64DFR1_EL1, and also drops dummy
> >> ftr_raz[] array which is now redundant. These register fields will be used
> >> to enable increased breakpoint and watchpoint registers via FEAT_Debugv8p9
> >> later.
> >>
> >> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
> >> Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
> >> cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
> >> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> >> Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> >> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
> >> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
> >> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
> >> ---
> >>  arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 21 ++++++++++++++++-----
> >>  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> >> index 718728a85430..bd4d85f5dd92 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> >> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
> >> @@ -530,6 +530,21 @@ static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_id_aa64dfr0[] = {
> >>  	ARM64_FTR_END,
> >>  };
> >>  
> >> +static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_id_aa64dfr1[] = {
> >> +	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_NONSTRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64DFR1_EL1_ABL_CMPs_SHIFT, 8, 0),
> >> +	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_NONSTRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64DFR1_EL1_DPFZS_SHIFT, 4, 0),
> >> +	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64DFR1_EL1_EBEP_SHIFT, 4, 0),
> >> +	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64DFR1_EL1_ITE_SHIFT, 4, 0),
> >> +	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64DFR1_EL1_ABLE_SHIFT, 4, 0),
> >> +	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_NONSTRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64DFR1_EL1_PMICNTR_SHIFT, 4, 0),
> >> +	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64DFR1_EL1_SPMU_SHIFT, 4, 0),
> >> +	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_NONSTRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64DFR1_EL1_CTX_CMPs_SHIFT, 8, 0),
> >> +	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_NONSTRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64DFR1_EL1_WRPs_SHIFT, 8, 0),
> >> +	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_NONSTRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64DFR1_EL1_BRPs_SHIFT, 8, 0),
> >> +	ARM64_FTR_BITS(FTR_HIDDEN, FTR_STRICT, FTR_LOWER_SAFE, ID_AA64DFR1_EL1_SYSPMUID_SHIFT, 8, 0),
> >> +	ARM64_FTR_END,
> >> +};
> > 
> > I think I mentioned this on an earlier series, but it would be useful to
> > see some justification in the commit message as to why some of these
> > features are considered STRICT vs NONSTRICT and why LOWER_SAFE is
> > preferred over EXACT.
> 
> I have updated the commit message regarding STRICT vs NONSTRICT as Mark had
> mentioned earlier (see below). But just wondering about FTR_LOWER_SAFE. All
> similar fields have been marked as FTR_LOWER_SAFE.
> 
> > 
> > For example, why is EBEP strict whereas other PMU-related fields aren't?
> 
> IIUC there are two types of fields here.
> 
> - Feature presence     (EBEP, ITE, ABLE etc)		---> FTR_STRICT
> - Debug resource count (WRPs, BRPs, CTX_CMPs etc)	---> FTR_NONSTRICT
> 
> > Why is the CTX_CMPs field treated differently to the same field in DFR0?
> 
> There is mismatch not only for CTX_CMPs but for WRPs and BRPs as well. As
> mentioned earlier, being resource count type, I believe these should be
> marked as FTR_NONSTRICT in existing DFR0 as well. I could send a patch
> fixing DFR0 first.
> 
> > 
> > I'm not saying the above table is wrong, it just looks arbitrary without
> > the justification.
> 
> Please find the updated version (v3) for this patch here for reference.

Please send new versions as new threads otherwise it's too easy to lose
track. Also, please give the rationale for the handling of each new field
in the commit message.

Will