public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>
To: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
Cc: Felix Fietkau <nbd@nbd.name>, Sean Wang <sean.wang@mediatek.com>,
	Mark Lee <Mark-MC.Lee@mediatek.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@gmail.com>,
	AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
	<angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: airoha: Fix EGRESS_RATE_METER_EN_MASK definition
Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2024 12:24:44 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ZwET7MzCGVoDjIqt@lore-desk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e4574a97-8e34-49be-9ec6-bb787104e6db@intel.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2417 bytes --]

> 
> 
> On 10/4/2024 2:51 PM, Lorenzo Bianconi wrote:
> > Fix typo in EGRESS_RATE_METER_EN_MASK mask definition. This bus was not
> > introducing any user visible problem.
> > 
> 
> I'm not sure I follow. This bit is used by airoha_qdma_init_qos which
> sets the REG_EGRESS_RATE_METER_CFG register?
> 
> How does this not provide any user visible issues? It seems like an
> incorrect enable bit likely means that QOS is not enabled? I'm guessing
> bit 29 is reserved?

Hi Jacob,

even if we are setting EGRESS_RATE_METER_EN_MASK bit (with a wrong value) in
REG_EGRESS_RATE_METER_CFG register, egress QoS metering will not be supported
yet since we are missing some other configuration (token bucket rate, token
bucket size. Airoha folks please correct me if I am wrong). This is why I do
not think it is important to backport this patch and I did not added any Fixes
tag.
QoS hw ingress/egress metering is in my ToDo list. Here I have ported the basic
qos configuration I found in the vendor sdk. I will add more info in the commit
log in v2. Sorry for the confusion.

Regards,
Lorenzo

> 
> It would be good to understand why this is not considered a fix?  The
> offending commit is in the net branch already.
> 
> > Introduced by commit 23020f049327 ("net: airoha: Introduce ethernet support
> > for EN7581 SoC")
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/airoha_eth.c | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/airoha_eth.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/airoha_eth.c
> > index 2e01abc70c170f32f4206b34e116b441c14c628e..a1cfdc146a41610a3a6b060bfdc6e1d9aad97d5d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/airoha_eth.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mediatek/airoha_eth.c
> > @@ -554,7 +554,7 @@
> >  #define FWD_DSCP_LOW_THR_MASK		GENMASK(17, 0)
> >  
> >  #define REG_EGRESS_RATE_METER_CFG		0x100c
> > -#define EGRESS_RATE_METER_EN_MASK		BIT(29)
> > +#define EGRESS_RATE_METER_EN_MASK		BIT(31)
> >  #define EGRESS_RATE_METER_EQ_RATE_EN_MASK	BIT(17)
> >  #define EGRESS_RATE_METER_WINDOW_SZ_MASK	GENMASK(16, 12)
> >  #define EGRESS_RATE_METER_TIMESLICE_MASK	GENMASK(10, 0)
> > 
> > ---
> > base-commit: c55ff46aeebed1704a9a6861777b799f15ce594d
> > change-id: 20241004-airoha-fixes-8aaa8177b234
> > 
> > Best regards,
> 

[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2024-10-05 10:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-04 21:51 [PATCH net-next] net: airoha: Fix EGRESS_RATE_METER_EN_MASK definition Lorenzo Bianconi
2024-10-04 22:49 ` Jacob Keller
2024-10-05 10:24   ` Lorenzo Bianconi [this message]
2024-10-08 16:46     ` Jacob Keller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ZwET7MzCGVoDjIqt@lore-desk \
    --to=lorenzo@kernel.org \
    --cc=Mark-MC.Lee@mediatek.com \
    --cc=angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
    --cc=nbd@nbd.name \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=sean.wang@mediatek.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox