public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hans Zhang <18255117159@163.com>
To: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>,
	Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, "Dom Cobley" <popcornmix@gmail.com>,
	"Phil Elwell" <phil@raspberrypi.com>,
	"Jim Quinlan" <jim2101024@gmail.com>,
	"Broadcom internal kernel review list"
	<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com>,
	"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
	"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kwilczynski@kernel.org>,
	"Manivannan Sadhasivam" <mani@kernel.org>,
	"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
	"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
	"moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2711/BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE"
	<linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"moderated list:BROADCOM BCM2711/BCM2835 ARM ARCHITECTURE"
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	"open list" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: brcmstb: Assign pcie->gen from pcie_get_link_speed()
Date: Tue, 5 May 2026 01:26:48 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <a491a592-5576-4987-a866-a8491f8612e8@163.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2f453b89-0ce8-4ef3-ae93-c282a2d08fd7@broadcom.com>



On 5/5/26 00:58, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> On 5/2/26 04:40, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> On Fri, May 01, 2026 at 01:24:38PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>> After commit 03f920936977 ("PCI: controller: Validate max-link-speed"),
>>> pcie->gen stopped being assigned and as a result the established PCIe
>>> link would stop supporting Gen3 speeds on 2712 since pcie->gen is used
>>> to populate LnkCntl2 and LnkCap in brcm_pcie_set_gen().
>>>
>>> Link: https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux/issues/7343
>>> Reported-by: Dom Cobley <popcornmix@gmail.com>
>>> Reported-by: Phil Elwell <phil@raspberrypi.com>
>>> Fixes: 03f920936977 ("PCI: controller: Validate max-link-speed")
>>> Signed-off-by: Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c | 3 +--
>>>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c b/drivers/pci/ 
>>> controller/pcie-brcmstb.c
>>> index 714bcab97b60..6138fc4bc064 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c
>>> @@ -2072,8 +2072,7 @@ static int brcm_pcie_probe(struct 
>>> platform_device *pdev)
>>>           return PTR_ERR(pcie->clk);
>>>       ret = of_pci_get_max_link_speed(np);
>>> -    if (pcie_get_link_speed(ret) == PCI_SPEED_UNKNOWN)
>>> -        pcie->gen = 0;
>>> +    pcie->gen = pcie_get_link_speed(ret);
>>
>> Take a look at https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260501202438.376033-1- 
>> florian.fainelli%40broadcom.com
>>
>> The notes at https://github.com/raspberrypi/linux/issues/7343 assumed
>> PCI_SPEED_UNKNOWN was 0, but in fact it is 0xff, which means you might
>> want the more defensive patch instead.
>>
>> I'll be happy to replace what's on pci/for-linus if so.
> 
> I am starting to think a revert is the simplest path forward, it's not 
> clear what pcie_get_link_speed() brings to the table honestly.

Hi Florian,

The pcie_get_link_speed function is designed to prevent other Root Port 
drivers from accessing the array pcie_link_speed out of bounds.



commit 03f920936977 ("PCI: controller: Validate max-link-speed")

diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c 
b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c
index 062f55690012..714bcab97b60 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c
@@ -1442,7 +1442,7 @@ static int brcm_pcie_start_link(struct brcm_pcie 
*pcie)
         cls = FIELD_GET(PCI_EXP_LNKSTA_CLS, lnksta);
         nlw = FIELD_GET(PCI_EXP_LNKSTA_NLW, lnksta);
         dev_info(dev, "link up, %s x%u %s\n",
-                pci_speed_string(pcie_link_speed[cls]), nlw,
+                pci_speed_string(pcie_get_link_speed(cls)), nlw,
                  ssc_good ? "(SSC)" : "(!SSC)");

         return 0;
@@ -2072,7 +2072,8 @@ static int brcm_pcie_probe(struct platform_device 
*pdev)
                 return PTR_ERR(pcie->clk);

         ret = of_pci_get_max_link_speed(np);
-       pcie->gen = (ret < 0) ? 0 : ret;
+       if (pcie_get_link_speed(ret) == PCI_SPEED_UNKNOWN)
+               pcie->gen = 0;




Sorry, it's my fault. Should it be changed to the following?
Florian, what do you think?



diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c 
b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c
index 714bcab97b60..9a09a48acfb5 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c
@@ -2074,6 +2074,8 @@ static int brcm_pcie_probe(struct platform_device 
*pdev)
         ret = of_pci_get_max_link_speed(np);
         if (pcie_get_link_speed(ret) == PCI_SPEED_UNKNOWN)
                 pcie->gen = 0;
+       else
+               pcie->gen = ret;

         pcie->ssc = of_property_read_bool(np, "brcm,enable-ssc");



or



diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c 
b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c
index 714bcab97b60..1187e19fbe89 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c
@@ -2072,8 +2072,7 @@ static int brcm_pcie_probe(struct platform_device 
*pdev)
                 return PTR_ERR(pcie->clk);

         ret = of_pci_get_max_link_speed(np);
-       if (pcie_get_link_speed(ret) == PCI_SPEED_UNKNOWN)
-               pcie->gen = 0;
+       pcie->gen = (ret < 0) ? 0 : ret;


Best regards,
Hans





  reply	other threads:[~2026-05-04 17:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-01 20:24 [PATCH] PCI: brcmstb: Assign pcie->gen from pcie_get_link_speed() Florian Fainelli
2026-05-01 22:03 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-05-01 22:05   ` Florian Fainelli
2026-05-02 11:40 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-05-04 16:58   ` Florian Fainelli
2026-05-04 17:26     ` Hans Zhang [this message]
2026-05-04 23:46       ` Florian Fainelli
2026-05-05 12:54         ` Hans Zhang
2026-05-05 16:01         ` Bjorn Helgaas
2026-05-05 17:58           ` Florian Fainelli
2026-05-05 21:31             ` Bjorn Helgaas

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=a491a592-5576-4987-a866-a8491f8612e8@163.com \
    --to=18255117159@163.com \
    --cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=florian.fainelli@broadcom.com \
    --cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
    --cc=jim2101024@gmail.com \
    --cc=kwilczynski@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
    --cc=mani@kernel.org \
    --cc=phil@raspberrypi.com \
    --cc=popcornmix@gmail.com \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox