From: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
To: Wen Jiang <jiangwenxiaomi@gmail.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, urezki@gmail.com
Cc: baohua@kernel.org, Xueyuan.chen21@gmail.com, rppt@kernel.org,
david@kernel.org, ryan.roberts@arm.com,
anshuman.khandual@arm.com, ajd@linux.ibm.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, jiangwen6@xiaomi.com,
shanghaoqiang@xiaomi.com, Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/6] mm/vmalloc: Speed up ioremap, vmalloc and vmap with contiguous memory
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 2026 12:07:11 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <a6e410bd-7413-45f0-9033-a60cd5386512@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260618084726.1070022-1-jiangwen6@xiaomi.com>
On 18/06/26 2:17 pm, Wen Jiang wrote:
> This patchset accelerates ioremap, vmalloc, and vmap when the memory
> is physically fully or partially contiguous. Two techniques are used:
>
> 1. Avoid page table rewalk when setting PTEs/PMDs for multiple memory
> segments
> 2. Use batched mappings wherever possible in both vmalloc and ARM64
> layers
>
> Besides accelerating the mapping path, this also enables large
> mappings (PMD and cont-PTE) for vmap, which are currently not
> supported.
>
> Patches 1-2 extend ARM64 vmalloc CONT-PTE mapping to support multiple
> CONT-PTE regions instead of just one.
>
> Patch 3 extracts a common helper vmap_set_ptes() that consolidates PTE
> mapping logic between the ioremap and vmalloc/vmap paths, handling both
> CONT_PTE and regular PTE mappings. This prepares for the next patch.
>
> Patch 4 extends the page table walk path to support page shifts other
> than PAGE_SHIFT and eliminates the page table rewalk for huge vmalloc
> mappings. The function is renamed from vmap_small_pages_range_noflush()
> to vmap_pages_range_noflush_walk().
>
> Patches 5-6 add huge vmap support for contiguous pages, including
> support for non-compound pages with pfn alignment verification.
>
> On the RK3588 8-core ARM64 SoC, with tasks pinned to a little core and
> the performance CPUfreq policy enabled, benchmark results:
>
> * ioremap(1 MB): 1.35x faster (3407 ns -> 2526 ns)
> * vmalloc(1 MB) mapping time (excluding allocation) with
> VM_ALLOW_HUGE_VMAP: 1.42x faster (5.00 us -> 3.53us)
> * vmap(100MB) with order-8 pages: 8.3x faster (1235 us -> 149 us)
>
> Many thanks to Xueyuan Chen for his testing efforts on RK3588 boards.
>
I am still a little nervous about doing vmap-huge by default.
We can play set_memory_* games on a vmap huge mapping partially, thus
forcing a pgtable split, and not all arches can handle a kernel pgtable
split.
For arm64, we can handle that with BBML2_NOABORT, but interestingly, in
change_memory_common, arch/arm64/mm/pageattr.c:
area = find_vm_area((void *)addr);
if (!area ||
((unsigned long)kasan_reset_tag((void *)end) >
(unsigned long)kasan_reset_tag(area->addr) + area->size) ||
((area->flags & (VM_ALLOC | VM_ALLOW_HUGE_VMAP)) != VM_ALLOC))
return -EINVAL;
Even before my change fcf8dda8cc48, we were bailing out on
!(area->flags & VM_ALLOC))
So on arm64 we haven't been supporting set_memory_* for vmap memory at all, because
it has VM_MAP set and not VM_ALLOC. Although we have a contradictory comment above
this code so not sure if this was intentional:
"Let's restrict ourselves to mappings created by vmalloc (or vmap)."
So either there is no user in the kernel doing vmap + set_memory_* (looks like it
by doing an LLM scan), or it is not fatal for set_memory_* to fail.
But even if no one does it now, technically the API allows it.
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-25 6:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-18 8:47 [PATCH v4 0/6] mm/vmalloc: Speed up ioremap, vmalloc and vmap with contiguous memory Wen Jiang
2026-06-18 8:47 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] arm64/hugetlb: Extend batching of multiple CONT_PTE in a single PTE setup Wen Jiang
2026-06-29 5:34 ` Dev Jain
2026-06-18 8:47 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] arm64/vmalloc: Allow arch_vmap_pte_range_map_size to batch multiple CONT_PTE Wen Jiang
2026-06-29 5:34 ` Dev Jain
2026-06-18 8:47 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] mm/vmalloc: Extract vmap_set_ptes() to consolidate PTE mapping logic Wen Jiang
2026-06-26 16:21 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2026-06-29 5:54 ` Dev Jain
2026-06-18 8:47 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] mm/vmalloc: Extend page table walk to support larger page_shift sizes and eliminate page table rewalk Wen Jiang
2026-06-29 6:20 ` Dev Jain
2026-06-18 8:47 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] mm/vmalloc: map contiguous pages in batches for vmap() if possible Wen Jiang
2026-06-30 13:54 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2026-07-02 9:18 ` Wen Jiang
2026-07-05 20:35 ` Andrew Morton
2026-07-06 7:22 ` Wen Jiang
2026-06-18 8:47 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] mm/vmalloc: align vm_area so vmap() can batch mappings Wen Jiang
2026-06-26 16:20 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2026-06-29 6:47 ` Dev Jain
2026-07-02 9:26 ` Wen Jiang
2026-06-25 2:57 ` [PATCH v4 0/6] mm/vmalloc: Speed up ioremap, vmalloc and vmap with contiguous memory Andrew Morton
2026-07-02 6:35 ` Wen Jiang
2026-07-02 9:04 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2026-07-02 9:12 ` Wen Jiang
2026-06-25 6:37 ` Dev Jain [this message]
2026-06-26 11:09 ` Barry Song
2026-06-26 15:12 ` Leo Yan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=a6e410bd-7413-45f0-9033-a60cd5386512@arm.com \
--to=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=Xueyuan.chen21@gmail.com \
--cc=ajd@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=david@kernel.org \
--cc=jiangwen6@xiaomi.com \
--cc=jiangwenxiaomi@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=shanghaoqiang@xiaomi.com \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox