From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, broonie@kernel.org,
catalin.marinas@arm.com, daniel.kiss@arm.com,
david.spickett@arm.com, luis.machado@arm.com, maz@kernel.org,
richard.sandiford@arm.com, sander.desmalen@arm.com,
tabba@google.com, tamas.petz@arm.com, tkjos@google.com,
yury.khrustalev@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/20] arm64/fpsimd: Make clone() compatible with ZA lazy saving
Date: Wed, 7 May 2025 16:22:06 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aBt6nvRmk1O_easH@J2N7QTR9R3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250507145800.GC2475@willie-the-truck>
On Wed, May 07, 2025 at 03:58:01PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Tue, May 06, 2025 at 04:25:16PM +0100, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > @@ -441,14 +449,39 @@ int copy_thread(struct task_struct *p, const struct kernel_clone_args *args)
> > childregs->sp = stack_start;
> > }
> >
> > + /*
> > + * Due to the AAPCS64 "ZA lazy saving scheme", PSTATE.ZA and
> > + * TPIDR2 need to be manipulated as a pair, and either both
> > + * need to be inherited or both need to be reset.
> > + *
> > + * Within a process, child threads must not inherit their
> > + * parent's TPIDR2 value or they may clobber their parent's
> > + * stack at some later point.
> > + *
> > + * When a process is fork()'d, the child must inherit ZA and
> > + * TPIDR2 from its parent in case there was dormant ZA state.
> > + *
> > + * Use CLONE_VM to determine when the child will share the
> > + * address space with the parent, and cannot safely inherit the
> > + * state.
> > + */
> > + if (system_supports_sme()) {
> > + if (!(clone_flags & CLONE_VM)) {
> > + p->thread.tpidr2_el0 = read_sysreg_s(SYS_TPIDR2_EL0);
>
> Why do we need to re-read this register given that we did this just a few
> lines earlier?
Sorry -- I had meant to delete the earlier read. My intent was to centralise
manipulation of TPIDR2 (and ZA) in this block so that it was clear that they
were manipulated as a pair.
I will delete the earlier read, and make this:
| if (system_supports_sme()) {
| if (!(clone_flags & CLONE_VM)) {
| p->thread.tpidr2_el0 = read_sysreg_s(SYS_TPIDR2_EL0);
| ret = copy_thread_za(p, current);
| if (ret)
| return ret;
| } else {
| p->thread.tpidr2_el0 = 0;
| WARN_ON_ONCE(p->thread.svcr & SVCR_ZA_MASK);
| }
| }
... or I can clear TPIDR2 in arch_dup_task_struct() along with ZA, delete the
earlier read here, and make this:
| if (system_supports_sme() && !(clone_flags & CLONE_VM)) {
| p->thread.tpidr2_el0 = read_sysreg_s(SYS_TPIDR2_EL0);
| ret = copy_thread_za(p, current);
| if (ret)
| return ret;
| }
Any preference?
[...]
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/abi/tpidr2.c b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/abi/tpidr2.c
> Thank you for updating the selftest, but please can you put it in a
> separate patch?
Sure; I'll factor all the selftest changes out into separate patches.
Mark.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-07 15:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-05-06 15:25 [PATCH 00/20] arm64: FPSIMD/SVE/SME fixes + re-eanble SME Mark Rutland
2025-05-06 15:25 ` [PATCH 01/20] kselftest/arm64: fp-ptrace: Fix expected FPMR value when PSTATE.SM is changed Mark Rutland
2025-05-06 15:25 ` [PATCH 02/20] arm64/fpsimd: Do not discard modified SVE state Mark Rutland
2025-05-06 15:25 ` [PATCH 03/20] arm64/fpsimd: signal: Clear PSTATE.SM when restoring FPSIMD frame only Mark Rutland
2025-05-07 12:46 ` Will Deacon
2025-05-07 14:01 ` Mark Rutland
2025-05-07 14:39 ` Will Deacon
2025-05-06 15:25 ` [PATCH 04/20] arm64/fpsimd: signal: Mandate SVE payload for streaming-mode state Mark Rutland
2025-05-07 0:59 ` Mark Brown
2025-05-07 12:59 ` Will Deacon
2025-05-07 14:21 ` Mark Rutland
2025-05-07 14:29 ` Will Deacon
2025-05-07 15:02 ` Mark Rutland
2025-05-07 16:14 ` Will Deacon
2025-05-06 15:25 ` [PATCH 05/20] arm64/fpsimd: ptrace: Consistently handle partial writes to NT_ARM_(S)SVE Mark Rutland
2025-05-06 15:25 ` [PATCH 06/20] arm64/fpsimd: Clarify sve_sync_*() functions Mark Rutland
2025-05-06 15:25 ` [PATCH 07/20] arm64/fpsimd: Factor out {sve,sme}_state_size() helpers Mark Rutland
2025-05-06 15:25 ` [PATCH 08/20] arm64/fpsimd: Add task_smstop_sm() Mark Rutland
2025-05-06 15:25 ` [PATCH 09/20] arm64/fpsimd: signal: Use SMSTOP behaviour in setup_return() Mark Rutland
2025-05-06 15:25 ` [PATCH 10/20] arm64/fpsimd: Remove redundant task->mm check Mark Rutland
2025-05-06 15:25 ` [PATCH 11/20] arm64/fpsimd: Consistently preserve FPSIMD state during clone() Mark Rutland
2025-05-06 15:25 ` [PATCH 12/20] arm64/fpsimd: Clear PSTATE.SM " Mark Rutland
2025-05-06 15:25 ` [PATCH 13/20] arm64/fpsimd: Make clone() compatible with ZA lazy saving Mark Rutland
2025-05-07 14:58 ` Will Deacon
2025-05-07 15:22 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2025-05-07 16:11 ` Will Deacon
2025-05-07 17:21 ` Mark Rutland
2025-05-07 15:57 ` Yury Khrustalev
2025-05-06 15:25 ` [PATCH 14/20] arm64/fpsimd: ptrace/prctl: Ensure VL changes do not resurrect stale data Mark Rutland
2025-05-06 15:25 ` [PATCH 15/20] arm64/fpsimd: ptrace/prctl: Ensure VL changes leave task in a valid state Mark Rutland
2025-05-07 16:12 ` Will Deacon
2025-05-07 17:10 ` Mark Rutland
2025-05-08 10:31 ` Will Deacon
2025-05-06 15:25 ` [PATCH 16/20] arm64/fpsimd: ptrace: Save task state before generating SVE header Mark Rutland
2025-05-06 15:25 ` [PATCH 17/20] arm64/fpsimd: ptrace: Do not present register data for inactive mode Mark Rutland
2025-05-06 15:25 ` [PATCH 18/20] arm64/fpsimd: ptrace: Mandate SVE payload for streaming-mode state Mark Rutland
2025-05-07 1:09 ` Mark Brown
2025-05-06 15:25 ` [PATCH 19/20] arm64/fpsimd: ptrace: Gracefully handle errors Mark Rutland
2025-05-07 16:32 ` Will Deacon
2025-05-08 12:12 ` Mark Rutland
2025-05-06 15:25 ` [PATCH 20/20] arm64/fpsimd: Allow CONFIG_ARM64_SME to be selected Mark Rutland
2025-05-07 1:48 ` [PATCH 00/20] arm64: FPSIMD/SVE/SME fixes + re-eanble SME Mark Brown
2025-05-07 9:56 ` Mark Rutland
2025-05-07 11:26 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aBt6nvRmk1O_easH@J2N7QTR9R3 \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=daniel.kiss@arm.com \
--cc=david.spickett@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=luis.machado@arm.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=richard.sandiford@arm.com \
--cc=sander.desmalen@arm.com \
--cc=tabba@google.com \
--cc=tamas.petz@arm.com \
--cc=tkjos@google.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yury.khrustalev@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox