From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: Ada Couprie Diaz <ada.coupriediaz@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
"Luis Claudio R . Goncalves" <lgoncalv@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 08/13] arm64: debug: refactor reinstall_suspended_bps()
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2025 16:46:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aF681FoBo8Bh-Pk6@willie-the-truck> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250620211207.773980-9-ada.coupriediaz@arm.com>
On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 10:12:02PM +0100, Ada Couprie Diaz wrote:
> `reinstall_suspended_bps()` plays a key part in the stepping process
> when we have hardware breakpoints and watchpoints enabled.
> It checks if we need to step one, will re-enable it if it has
> been handled and will return whether or not we need to proceed with
> a single-step.
>
> However, the current naming and return values make it harder to understand
> the logic and goal of the function.
>
> Rename it `try_step_suspended_breakpoints()` and change the return value
> to a boolean, aligning it with similar functions used in
> `do_el0_undef()` like `try_emulate_mrs()`, and making its behaviour
> more obvious.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ada Couprie Diaz <ada.coupriediaz@arm.com>
> Tested-by: Luis Claudio R. Goncalves <lgoncalv@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/debug-monitors.h | 6 +++---
> arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c | 2 +-
> arch/arm64/kernel/hw_breakpoint.c | 25 ++++++++++++-------------
> 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Will
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-27 16:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-20 21:11 [PATCH v4 00/13] arm64: debug: remove hook registration, split exception entry Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-06-20 21:11 ` [PATCH v4 01/13] arm64: debug: clean up single_step_handler logic Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-06-27 15:44 ` Will Deacon
2025-06-20 21:11 ` [PATCH v4 02/13] arm64: refactor aarch32_break_handler() Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-06-27 15:45 ` Will Deacon
2025-06-20 21:11 ` [PATCH v4 03/13] arm64: debug: call software breakpoint handlers statically Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-06-27 15:45 ` Will Deacon
2025-06-20 21:11 ` [PATCH v4 04/13] arm64: debug: call step " Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-06-27 15:45 ` Will Deacon
2025-06-20 21:11 ` [PATCH v4 05/13] arm64: debug: remove break/step handler registration infrastructure Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-06-27 15:45 ` Will Deacon
2025-06-20 21:12 ` [PATCH v4 06/13] arm64: entry: Add entry and exit functions for debug exceptions Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-06-27 15:46 ` Will Deacon
2025-06-20 21:12 ` [PATCH v4 07/13] arm64: debug: split hardware breakpoint exception entry Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-06-27 15:46 ` Will Deacon
2025-06-20 21:12 ` [PATCH v4 08/13] arm64: debug: refactor reinstall_suspended_bps() Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-06-27 15:46 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2025-06-20 21:12 ` [PATCH v4 09/13] arm64: debug: split single stepping exception entry Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-06-27 15:46 ` Will Deacon
2025-06-20 21:12 ` [PATCH v4 10/13] arm64: debug: split hardware watchpoint " Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-06-27 15:46 ` Will Deacon
2025-06-20 21:12 ` [PATCH v4 11/13] arm64: debug: split brk64 " Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-06-27 15:47 ` Will Deacon
2025-06-20 21:12 ` [PATCH v4 12/13] arm64: debug: split bkpt32 " Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-06-27 15:47 ` Will Deacon
2025-06-20 21:12 ` [PATCH v4 13/13] arm64: debug: remove debug exception registration infrastructure Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-06-27 15:47 ` Will Deacon
2025-06-27 15:48 ` [PATCH v4 00/13] arm64: debug: remove hook registration, split exception entry Will Deacon
2025-06-27 17:27 ` Ada Couprie Diaz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aF681FoBo8Bh-Pk6@willie-the-truck \
--to=will@kernel.org \
--cc=ada.coupriediaz@arm.com \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=lgoncalv@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox