From: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
To: Ada Couprie Diaz <ada.coupriediaz@arm.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
"Luis Claudio R . Goncalves" <lgoncalv@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 02/13] arm64: refactor aarch32_break_handler()
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2025 16:45:02 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aF68fmViXqlrU0Eg@willie-the-truck> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250620211207.773980-3-ada.coupriediaz@arm.com>
On Fri, Jun 20, 2025 at 10:11:56PM +0100, Ada Couprie Diaz wrote:
> `aarch32_break_handler()` is called in `do_el0_undef()` when we
> are trying to handle an exception whose Exception Syndrome is unknown.
> It checks if the instruction hit might be a 32-bit arm break (be it
> A32 or T2), and sends a SIGTRAP to userspace if it is so that it can
> be handled.
>
> However, this is badly represented in the naming of the function, and
> is not consistent with the other functions called with the same logic
> in `do_el0_undef()`.
>
> Rename it `try_handle_aarch32_break()` and change the return value to
> a boolean to align with the logic of the other tentative handlers in
> `do_el0_undef()`, the previous error code being ignored anyway.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ada Couprie Diaz <ada.coupriediaz@arm.com>
> Tested-by: Luis Claudio R. Goncalves <lgoncalv@redhat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
> Acked-by: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/debug-monitors.h | 2 +-
> arch/arm64/kernel/debug-monitors.c | 10 +++++-----
> arch/arm64/kernel/traps.c | 2 +-
> 3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
Reviewed-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Will
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-27 17:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-20 21:11 [PATCH v4 00/13] arm64: debug: remove hook registration, split exception entry Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-06-20 21:11 ` [PATCH v4 01/13] arm64: debug: clean up single_step_handler logic Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-06-27 15:44 ` Will Deacon
2025-06-20 21:11 ` [PATCH v4 02/13] arm64: refactor aarch32_break_handler() Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-06-27 15:45 ` Will Deacon [this message]
2025-06-20 21:11 ` [PATCH v4 03/13] arm64: debug: call software breakpoint handlers statically Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-06-27 15:45 ` Will Deacon
2025-06-20 21:11 ` [PATCH v4 04/13] arm64: debug: call step " Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-06-27 15:45 ` Will Deacon
2025-06-20 21:11 ` [PATCH v4 05/13] arm64: debug: remove break/step handler registration infrastructure Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-06-27 15:45 ` Will Deacon
2025-06-20 21:12 ` [PATCH v4 06/13] arm64: entry: Add entry and exit functions for debug exceptions Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-06-27 15:46 ` Will Deacon
2025-06-20 21:12 ` [PATCH v4 07/13] arm64: debug: split hardware breakpoint exception entry Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-06-27 15:46 ` Will Deacon
2025-06-20 21:12 ` [PATCH v4 08/13] arm64: debug: refactor reinstall_suspended_bps() Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-06-27 15:46 ` Will Deacon
2025-06-20 21:12 ` [PATCH v4 09/13] arm64: debug: split single stepping exception entry Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-06-27 15:46 ` Will Deacon
2025-06-20 21:12 ` [PATCH v4 10/13] arm64: debug: split hardware watchpoint " Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-06-27 15:46 ` Will Deacon
2025-06-20 21:12 ` [PATCH v4 11/13] arm64: debug: split brk64 " Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-06-27 15:47 ` Will Deacon
2025-06-20 21:12 ` [PATCH v4 12/13] arm64: debug: split bkpt32 " Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-06-27 15:47 ` Will Deacon
2025-06-20 21:12 ` [PATCH v4 13/13] arm64: debug: remove debug exception registration infrastructure Ada Couprie Diaz
2025-06-27 15:47 ` Will Deacon
2025-06-27 15:48 ` [PATCH v4 00/13] arm64: debug: remove hook registration, split exception entry Will Deacon
2025-06-27 17:27 ` Ada Couprie Diaz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aF68fmViXqlrU0Eg@willie-the-truck \
--to=will@kernel.org \
--cc=ada.coupriediaz@arm.com \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=lgoncalv@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox