From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@arm.com>
Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, broonie@kernel.org,
oliver.upton@linux.dev, ardb@kernel.org, frederic@kernel.org,
james.morse@arm.com, joey.gouly@arm.com,
scott@os.amperecomputing.com, maz@kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/7] arm64/futex: add futex atomic operation with FEAT_LSUI
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2025 12:03:30 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aH4egvxnbQPu1XzE@J2N7QTR9R3> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250721083618.2743569-6-yeoreum.yun@arm.com>
On Mon, Jul 21, 2025 at 09:36:16AM +0100, Yeoreum Yun wrote:
> Current futex atomic operations are implemented with ll/sc instructions and
> clearing PSTATE.PAN.
>
> Since Armv9.6, FEAT_LSUI supplies not only load/store instructions but
> also atomic operation for user memory access in kernel it doesn't need
> to clear PSTATE.PAN bit anymore.
>
> With theses instructions some of futex atomic operations don't need to
> be implmented with ldxr/stlxr pair instead can be implmented with
> one atomic operation supplied by FEAT_LSUI.
>
> However, some of futex atomic operations still need to use ll/sc way
> via ldtxr/stltxr supplied by FEAT_LSUI since there is no correspondant
> atomic instruction or doesn't support word size operation
> (i.e) eor, cas{mb}t But It's good to work without clearing PSTATE.PAN bit.
That's unfortunate; have we fed back to Arm's architecture folks that we
care about those cases?
> Signed-off-by: Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@arm.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/include/asm/futex_lsui.h | 132 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 132 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 arch/arm64/include/asm/futex_lsui.h
This logic is introduced unused, and TBH I don't think this needs to be
in a separate header.
I reckon it's be better to keep all of this in <asm/futex.h> and rework
the series to:
(1) Factor out the existing LL/SC logic into separate LL/SC helpers in
<asm/futex.h>, with an __llsc_ prefix, called by the existing
functions.
(2) Add the new __lsui_ futex operations to <asm/futex.h>, along with
code to select between the __llsc_ and __lsui_ versions.
We split the regular atomics different becuase there are *many* generic
atomic operations, but I don't think it's worthwhile to split the futex
logic over several headers.
Maybe it's worth having <asm/lsui.h>, but for now I reckon it's best to
also fold that into <asm/futex.h>, and we can split it out later if we
need it for something else.
Mark.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-07-21 11:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-07-21 8:36 [PATCH v4 0/7] support FEAT_LSUI and apply it on futex atomic ops Yeoreum Yun
2025-07-21 8:36 ` [PATCH v4 1/7] arm64: cpufeature: add FEAT_LSUI Yeoreum Yun
2025-07-21 8:36 ` [PATCH v4 2/7] KVM/arm64: expose FEAT_LSUI to guest Yeoreum Yun
2025-07-21 8:36 ` [PATCH v4 3/7] arm64/Kconfig: add LSUI Kconfig Yeoreum Yun
2025-07-21 10:52 ` Mark Rutland
2025-07-22 8:17 ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-07-21 8:36 ` [PATCH v4 4/7] arm64/futex: move futex atomic logic with clearing PAN bit Yeoreum Yun
2025-07-21 10:56 ` Mark Rutland
2025-07-22 8:21 ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-07-21 8:36 ` [PATCH v4 5/7] arm64/futex: add futex atomic operation with FEAT_LSUI Yeoreum Yun
2025-07-21 11:03 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2025-07-22 8:34 ` Yeoreum Yun
2025-07-21 8:36 ` [PATCH v4 6/7] arm64/asm: introduce lsui.h Yeoreum Yun
2025-07-21 8:36 ` [PATCH v4 7/7] arm64/futex: support futex with FEAT_LSUI Yeoreum Yun
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aH4egvxnbQPu1XzE@J2N7QTR9R3 \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=ardb@kernel.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=scott@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yeoreum.yun@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox