From: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com>
To: "Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu)" <tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com>
Cc: "james.morse@arm.com" <james.morse@arm.com>,
"reinette.chatre@intel.com" <reinette.chatre@intel.com>,
"fenghuay@nvidia.com" <fenghuay@nvidia.com>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"dave.martin@arm.com" <dave.martin@arm.com>,
"andre.przywara@arm.com" <andre.przywara@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 05/11] arm_mpam: Ensure MBWU counters are reset on restore
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2026 10:34:13 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aa0d9daf-95c8-4479-91a7-87eefa86f2b4@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <TY4PR01MB16930674F986639651CEE6C4A8BC72@TY4PR01MB16930.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
Hi Shaopeng,
On 7/16/26 01:26, Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu) wrote:
> Hello Ben,
>
>>>> When an MSC becomes inaccessible due to cpu offline CFG_MBWU_CTL is set to
>>>> zero in mpam_save_mbwu_state(). This is very likely to mean that the config
>>>> will mismatch when restoring and so the monitor will be reset. However, the
>>>> state may have been lost and so there are no guarantees. Ensure the reset
>>>> happens by setting the reset_on_next_read and remove the unnecessary writes
>>> >from mpam_save_mbwu_state().
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: 41e8a14950e1 ("arm_mpam: Track bandwidth counter state for power management")
>>>> Signed-off-by: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com>
>>>> ---
>>>> drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c | 13 +++++++------
>>>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c
>>>> index b34e2a368516..222fc248067e 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c
>>>> @@ -1648,10 +1648,13 @@ static int mpam_restore_mbwu_state(void *_ris)
>>>> u64 val;
>>>> struct mon_read mwbu_arg;
>>>> struct mpam_msc_ris *ris = _ris;
>>>> + struct msmon_mbwu_state *mbwu_state;
>>>> struct mpam_msc *msc = ris->vmsc->msc;
>>>> struct mpam_class *class = ris->vmsc->comp->class;
>>>>
>>>> for (i = 0; i < ris->props.num_mbwu_mon; i++) {
>>>> + mbwu_state = &ris->mbwu_state[i];
>>>> +
>>>> if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!mpam_mon_sel_lock(msc)))
>>>> return -EIO;
>>>>
>>>> @@ -1661,6 +1664,8 @@ static int mpam_restore_mbwu_state(void *_ris)
>>>> mwbu_arg.type = mpam_msmon_choose_counter(class);
>>>> mwbu_arg.val = &val;
>>>>
>>>> + mbwu_state->reset_on_next_read = true;
>>>> +
>>>> mpam_mon_sel_unlock(msc);
>>>
>>> for (i = 0; i < ris->props.num_mbwu_mon; i++) {
>>> + mbwu_state = &ris->mbwu_state[i];
>>> +
>>> if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!mpam_mon_sel_lock(msc)))
>>> return -EIO;
>>>
>>> - if (ris->mbwu_state[i].enabled) {
>>> + if (mbwu_state->enabled) { //this line might need refactoring
>>
>> I'm unclear on what you are trying to point out in this email. Please can you explain.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Ben
>
> Inside the for loop, you introduced `mbwu_state = &ris->mbwu_state[i];` a few lines earlier,
> and then used `mbwu_state->reset_on_next_read = true;` shortly after.
> Therefore, using mbwu_state->enabled and mbwu_state->cfg keeps
> the whole block consistent and avoids repeating ris->mbwu_state[i] multiple times.
Thanks for explaining. Indeed, continuing to use the ris->mbwu_state[i] once it's assigned to a
local variable does make this a bit messy.
Ben
>
> Best regards,
> Shaopeng TAN
>
>>> mwbu_arg.ris = ris;
>>> - mwbu_arg.ctx = &ris->mbwu_state[i].cfg;
>>> + mwbu_arg.ctx = &mbwu_state->cfg; //and this line
>>> mwbu_arg.type = mpam_msmon_choose_counter(class);
>>> mwbu_arg.val = &val;
>>>
>>> + mbwu_state->reset_on_next_read = true;
>>> +
>>> mpam_mon_sel_unlock(msc);
>>>
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Shaopeng TAN
>>>
>>>> __ris_msmon_read(&mwbu_arg);
>>>> @@ -1696,15 +1701,11 @@ static int mpam_save_mbwu_state(void *arg)
>>>>
>>>> cur_flt = mpam_read_monsel_reg(msc, CFG_MBWU_FLT);
>>>> cur_ctl = mpam_read_monsel_reg(msc, CFG_MBWU_CTL);
>>>> - mpam_write_monsel_reg(msc, CFG_MBWU_CTL, 0);
>>>>
>>>> - if (mpam_ris_has_mbwu_long_counter(ris)) {
>>>> + if (mpam_ris_has_mbwu_long_counter(ris))
>>>> val = mpam_msc_read_mbwu_l(msc);
>>>> - mpam_msc_zero_mbwu_l(msc);
>>>> - } else {
>>>> + else
>>>> val = mpam_read_monsel_reg(msc, MBWU);
>>>> - mpam_write_monsel_reg(msc, MBWU, 0);
>>>> - }
>>>>
>>>> cfg->mon = i;
>>>> cfg->pmg = FIELD_GET(MSMON_CFG_x_FLT_PMG, cur_flt);
>>>> --
>>>> 2.43.0
>>
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-16 9:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-10 11:55 [PATCH v1 00/11] arm_mpam: minor fixes at v7.2 Ben Horgan
2026-07-10 11:55 ` [PATCH v1 01/11] arm_mpam: Move MPAMF_ECR write helpers to allow reuse Ben Horgan
2026-07-10 11:55 ` [PATCH v1 02/11] arm_mpam: Restore the error interrupt enable from mpam_cpu_online() Ben Horgan
2026-07-16 3:59 ` Gavin Shan
2026-07-16 8:59 ` Ben Horgan
2026-07-17 0:51 ` Gavin Shan
2026-07-10 11:55 ` [PATCH v1 03/11] arm_mpam: Set mpam_feat_msmon_mbwu_31counter when there are bandwidth counters Ben Horgan
2026-07-15 6:34 ` Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu)
2026-07-15 9:11 ` Ben Horgan
2026-07-16 4:18 ` Gavin Shan
2026-07-16 9:26 ` Ben Horgan
2026-07-17 0:52 ` Gavin Shan
2026-07-10 11:55 ` [PATCH v1 04/11] arm_mpam: Add missing mon_sel locking in MBWU restore Ben Horgan
2026-07-16 4:29 ` Gavin Shan
2026-07-16 9:31 ` Ben Horgan
2026-07-17 0:53 ` Gavin Shan
2026-07-17 0:56 ` Gavin Shan
2026-07-10 11:55 ` [PATCH v1 05/11] arm_mpam: Ensure MBWU counters are reset on restore Ben Horgan
2026-07-15 7:49 ` Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu)
2026-07-15 8:45 ` Ben Horgan
2026-07-16 0:26 ` Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu)
2026-07-16 9:34 ` Ben Horgan [this message]
2026-07-10 11:55 ` [PATCH v1 06/11] arm_mpam: Use __ris_msmon_read() for saving MBWU state Ben Horgan
2026-07-16 4:49 ` Gavin Shan
2026-07-17 0:55 ` Gavin Shan
2026-07-10 11:55 ` [PATCH v1 07/11] arm_mpam: Initialize all of struct mon_read in mpam_restore_mbwu_state() Ben Horgan
2026-07-17 0:55 ` Gavin Shan
2026-07-10 11:55 ` [PATCH v1 08/11] arm_mpam: resctrl: Correct check that existing class is L3 Ben Horgan
2026-07-16 4:51 ` Gavin Shan
2026-07-10 11:55 ` [PATCH v1 09/11] arm_mpam: resctrl: Make read_mon_cdp_safe() self consistent Ben Horgan
2026-07-16 4:51 ` Gavin Shan
2026-07-10 11:55 ` [PATCH v1 10/11] arm_mpam: Don't loop forever if there is the maximum possible amount of PARTIDs Ben Horgan
2026-07-16 4:52 ` Gavin Shan
2026-07-10 11:55 ` [PATCH v1 11/11] arm_mpam: Switch to kvzmalloc_objs() for allocation of component cfg Ben Horgan
2026-07-16 4:52 ` Gavin Shan
2026-07-16 4:58 ` [PATCH v1 00/11] arm_mpam: minor fixes at v7.2 Gavin Shan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aa0d9daf-95c8-4479-91a7-87eefa86f2b4@arm.com \
--to=ben.horgan@arm.com \
--cc=andre.przywara@arm.com \
--cc=dave.martin@arm.com \
--cc=fenghuay@nvidia.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=reinette.chatre@intel.com \
--cc=tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox