* [PATCH] KVM: arm64: Expose PMMIR_EL1.SLOTS to guests
@ 2026-06-01 19:39 Congkai Tan
2026-06-01 20:06 ` Oliver Upton
2026-06-02 4:14 ` kernel test robot
0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Congkai Tan @ 2026-06-01 19:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: kvmarm, linux-arm-kernel
Cc: Congkai Tan, Marc Zyngier, Oliver Upton, Joey Gouly,
Suzuki K Poulose, Zenghui Yu, Catalin Marinas, Will Deacon,
Mark Rutland, Haris Okanovic, Geoff Blake, linux-kernel
Commit 46081078feb4 ("KVM: arm64: Upgrade PMU support to ARMv8.4")
trapped PMMIR_EL1 as RAZ/WI and masked STALL_SLOT* from PMCEID1 to
discourage guests from relying on a register they could not read.
Forward the SLOTS field of PMMIR_EL1 so that the perf userspace tool
can read the correct value from
/sys/bus/event_source/devices/armv8_pmuv3_0/caps/slots. Today, perf
stat fails with message "Failure to read '#slots'" because it can
only read 0x0 from the sysfs location, causing the parsing failure
of the default metrics.
Fix this by:
1. Adding an access_pmmir() handler that reads arm_pmu->reg_pmmir
and returns a masked value containing only the SLOTS field [7:0]
to the guest. Other PMMIR_EL1 fields are kept as RAZ to limit
the extra information that this change exposes; individual
fields can be unmasked as KVM gains support for each feature.
2. Removing the STALL_SLOT, STALL_SLOT_FRONTEND and STALL_SLOT_BACKEND
mask in PMCEID1. The mask existed to hide these events under the
sysfs events/ directory when PMMIR_EL1 was RAZ; with SLOTS now
readable they should be correctly exposed.
Tested on Graviton 2 (Neoverse N1, pre-PMUv3p4), Graviton 3
(Neoverse V1) and Graviton 4 (Neoverse V2) metal hosts with QEMU:
caps/slots reads 0x00000008 in guests on Graviton 3/4 and 0x00000000
on Graviton 2 (correct for pre-PMUv3p4). perf stat correctly
evaluates the default metrics.
Fixes: 46081078feb4 ("KVM: arm64: Upgrade PMU support to ARMv8.4")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Congkai Tan <congkai@amazon.com>
Reviewed-by: Haris Okanovic <harisokn@amazon.com>
Reviewed-by: Geoff Blake <blakgeof@amazon.com>
---
arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c | 11 +----------
arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--
2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c
index e1860acae641..bafd5a258927 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c
@@ -864,16 +864,7 @@ static u64 compute_pmceid0(struct arm_pmu *pmu)
static u64 compute_pmceid1(struct arm_pmu *pmu)
{
- u64 val = __compute_pmceid(pmu, 1);
-
- /*
- * Don't advertise STALL_SLOT*, as PMMIR_EL0 is handled
- * as RAZ
- */
- val &= ~(BIT_ULL(ARMV8_PMUV3_PERFCTR_STALL_SLOT - 32) |
- BIT_ULL(ARMV8_PMUV3_PERFCTR_STALL_SLOT_FRONTEND - 32) |
- BIT_ULL(ARMV8_PMUV3_PERFCTR_STALL_SLOT_BACKEND - 32));
- return val;
+ return __compute_pmceid(pmu, 1);
}
u64 kvm_pmu_get_pmceid(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool pmceid1)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
index 148fc3400ea8..7da7566dfd9f 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
@@ -18,6 +18,7 @@
#include <linux/printk.h>
#include <linux/uaccess.h>
#include <linux/irqchip/arm-gic-v3.h>
+#include <linux/perf/arm_pmu.h>
#include <asm/arm_pmuv3.h>
#include <asm/cacheflush.h>
@@ -1370,6 +1371,27 @@ static bool access_pminten(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct sys_reg_params *p,
return true;
}
+/*
+ * Expose only PMMIR_EL1.SLOTS to the guest, which is consumed by perf in its
+ * topdown default metric group. Other PMMIR_EL1 fields remain RAZ. Future
+ * patches can extend the exposed mask incrementally as KVM gains support for
+ * those features.
+ */
+static bool access_pmmir(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct sys_reg_params *p,
+ const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
+{
+ struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu = vcpu->kvm->arch.arm_pmu;
+
+ if (p->is_write)
+ return write_to_read_only(vcpu, p, r);
+
+ if (check_pmu_access_disabled(vcpu, 0))
+ return false;
+
+ p->regval = cpu_pmu->reg_pmmir & ARMV8_PMU_SLOTS;
+ return true;
+}
+
static bool access_pmovs(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct sys_reg_params *p,
const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
{
@@ -3456,7 +3478,7 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc sys_reg_descs[] = {
{ PMU_SYS_REG(PMINTENCLR_EL1),
.access = access_pminten, .reg = PMINTENSET_EL1,
.get_user = get_pmreg, .set_user = set_pmreg },
- { SYS_DESC(SYS_PMMIR_EL1), trap_raz_wi },
+ { PMU_SYS_REG(PMMIR_EL1), .access = access_pmmir, .reset = NULL },
{ SYS_DESC(SYS_MAIR_EL1), access_vm_reg, reset_unknown, MAIR_EL1 },
{ SYS_DESC(SYS_PIRE0_EL1), NULL, reset_unknown, PIRE0_EL1,
@@ -4600,7 +4622,7 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc cp15_regs[] = {
{ CP15_PMU_SYS_REG(HI, 0, 9, 14, 4), .access = access_pmceid },
{ CP15_PMU_SYS_REG(HI, 0, 9, 14, 5), .access = access_pmceid },
/* PMMIR */
- { CP15_PMU_SYS_REG(DIRECT, 0, 9, 14, 6), .access = trap_raz_wi },
+ { CP15_PMU_SYS_REG(DIRECT, 0, 9, 14, 6), .access = access_pmmir },
/* PRRR/MAIR0 */
{ AA32(LO), Op1( 0), CRn(10), CRm( 2), Op2( 0), access_vm_reg, NULL, MAIR_EL1 },
base-commit: 1702da76e017ae0fbe1a92b07bc332972c293e89
--
2.50.1
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] KVM: arm64: Expose PMMIR_EL1.SLOTS to guests
2026-06-01 19:39 [PATCH] KVM: arm64: Expose PMMIR_EL1.SLOTS to guests Congkai Tan
@ 2026-06-01 20:06 ` Oliver Upton
2026-06-01 20:13 ` Oliver Upton
2026-06-02 4:14 ` kernel test robot
1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Oliver Upton @ 2026-06-01 20:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Congkai Tan
Cc: kvmarm, linux-arm-kernel, Marc Zyngier, Joey Gouly,
Suzuki K Poulose, Zenghui Yu, Catalin Marinas, Will Deacon,
Mark Rutland, Haris Okanovic, Geoff Blake, linux-kernel
Hi Congkai,
On Mon, Jun 01, 2026 at 07:39:54PM +0000, Congkai Tan wrote:
> Commit 46081078feb4 ("KVM: arm64: Upgrade PMU support to ARMv8.4")
> trapped PMMIR_EL1 as RAZ/WI and masked STALL_SLOT* from PMCEID1 to
> discourage guests from relying on a register they could not read.
>
> Forward the SLOTS field of PMMIR_EL1 so that the perf userspace tool
> can read the correct value from
> /sys/bus/event_source/devices/armv8_pmuv3_0/caps/slots. Today, perf
> stat fails with message "Failure to read '#slots'" because it can
> only read 0x0 from the sysfs location, causing the parsing failure
> of the default metrics.
>
> Fix this by:
> 1. Adding an access_pmmir() handler that reads arm_pmu->reg_pmmir
> and returns a masked value containing only the SLOTS field [7:0]
> to the guest. Other PMMIR_EL1 fields are kept as RAZ to limit
> the extra information that this change exposes; individual
> fields can be unmasked as KVM gains support for each feature.
> 2. Removing the STALL_SLOT, STALL_SLOT_FRONTEND and STALL_SLOT_BACKEND
> mask in PMCEID1. The mask existed to hide these events under the
> sysfs events/ directory when PMMIR_EL1 was RAZ; with SLOTS now
> readable they should be correctly exposed.
>
> Tested on Graviton 2 (Neoverse N1, pre-PMUv3p4), Graviton 3
> (Neoverse V1) and Graviton 4 (Neoverse V2) metal hosts with QEMU:
> caps/slots reads 0x00000008 in guests on Graviton 3/4 and 0x00000000
> on Graviton 2 (correct for pre-PMUv3p4). perf stat correctly
> evaluates the default metrics.
>
> Fixes: 46081078feb4 ("KVM: arm64: Upgrade PMU support to ARMv8.4")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
This is not stable-worthy, nor is it a bugfix. As KVM presently does not
implement the STALL_SLOTS* events, PMMIR_EL0.SLOTS = 0 is a legal
implementation of FEAT_PMUv3p4.
> ---
> arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c | 11 +----------
> arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c
> index e1860acae641..bafd5a258927 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c
> @@ -864,16 +864,7 @@ static u64 compute_pmceid0(struct arm_pmu *pmu)
>
> static u64 compute_pmceid1(struct arm_pmu *pmu)
> {
> - u64 val = __compute_pmceid(pmu, 1);
> -
> - /*
> - * Don't advertise STALL_SLOT*, as PMMIR_EL0 is handled
> - * as RAZ
> - */
> - val &= ~(BIT_ULL(ARMV8_PMUV3_PERFCTR_STALL_SLOT - 32) |
> - BIT_ULL(ARMV8_PMUV3_PERFCTR_STALL_SLOT_FRONTEND - 32) |
> - BIT_ULL(ARMV8_PMUV3_PERFCTR_STALL_SLOT_BACKEND - 32));
> - return val;
> + return __compute_pmceid(pmu, 1);
> }
Make the change to PMCEID1 in a separate patch from PMMIR_EL1.
> +/*
> + * Expose only PMMIR_EL1.SLOTS to the guest, which is consumed by perf in its
> + * topdown default metric group. Other PMMIR_EL1 fields remain RAZ. Future
> + * patches can extend the exposed mask incrementally as KVM gains support for
> + * those features.
> + */
> +static bool access_pmmir(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct sys_reg_params *p,
> + const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
> +{
> + struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu = vcpu->kvm->arch.arm_pmu;
> +
> + if (p->is_write)
> + return write_to_read_only(vcpu, p, r);
> +
> + if (check_pmu_access_disabled(vcpu, 0))
> + return false;
> +
> + p->regval = cpu_pmu->reg_pmmir & ARMV8_PMU_SLOTS;
> + return true;
> +}
> +
We can't change the value of PMMIR_EL1 unconditionally since older KVM
treated this register as RAZ/WI. This also mixes poorly with the default
PMU garbage that we have since as the value of the register can change
based on where KVM_ARM_VCPU_INIT gets called...
Considering everything, I'd like to see this wired up where:
- PMMIR_EL1.SLOTS takes the value of the underlying hardware PMU only
if the VMM explicitly selects a particular PMU implementation
- KVM allows userspace to set PMMIR_EL1.SLOTS=0 for backwards
compatibility
Thanks,
Oliver
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] KVM: arm64: Expose PMMIR_EL1.SLOTS to guests
2026-06-01 20:06 ` Oliver Upton
@ 2026-06-01 20:13 ` Oliver Upton
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Oliver Upton @ 2026-06-01 20:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Congkai Tan
Cc: kvmarm, linux-arm-kernel, Marc Zyngier, Joey Gouly,
Suzuki K Poulose, Zenghui Yu, Catalin Marinas, Will Deacon,
Mark Rutland, Haris Okanovic, Geoff Blake, linux-kernel
On Mon, Jun 01, 2026 at 01:06:17PM -0700, Oliver Upton wrote:
> Hi Congkai,
>
> On Mon, Jun 01, 2026 at 07:39:54PM +0000, Congkai Tan wrote:
> > Commit 46081078feb4 ("KVM: arm64: Upgrade PMU support to ARMv8.4")
> > trapped PMMIR_EL1 as RAZ/WI and masked STALL_SLOT* from PMCEID1 to
> > discourage guests from relying on a register they could not read.
> >
> > Forward the SLOTS field of PMMIR_EL1 so that the perf userspace tool
> > can read the correct value from
> > /sys/bus/event_source/devices/armv8_pmuv3_0/caps/slots. Today, perf
> > stat fails with message "Failure to read '#slots'" because it can
> > only read 0x0 from the sysfs location, causing the parsing failure
> > of the default metrics.
> >
> > Fix this by:
> > 1. Adding an access_pmmir() handler that reads arm_pmu->reg_pmmir
> > and returns a masked value containing only the SLOTS field [7:0]
> > to the guest. Other PMMIR_EL1 fields are kept as RAZ to limit
> > the extra information that this change exposes; individual
> > fields can be unmasked as KVM gains support for each feature.
> > 2. Removing the STALL_SLOT, STALL_SLOT_FRONTEND and STALL_SLOT_BACKEND
> > mask in PMCEID1. The mask existed to hide these events under the
> > sysfs events/ directory when PMMIR_EL1 was RAZ; with SLOTS now
> > readable they should be correctly exposed.
> >
> > Tested on Graviton 2 (Neoverse N1, pre-PMUv3p4), Graviton 3
> > (Neoverse V1) and Graviton 4 (Neoverse V2) metal hosts with QEMU:
> > caps/slots reads 0x00000008 in guests on Graviton 3/4 and 0x00000000
> > on Graviton 2 (correct for pre-PMUv3p4). perf stat correctly
> > evaluates the default metrics.
> >
> > Fixes: 46081078feb4 ("KVM: arm64: Upgrade PMU support to ARMv8.4")
> > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
>
> This is not stable-worthy, nor is it a bugfix. As KVM presently does not
> implement the STALL_SLOTS* events, PMMIR_EL0.SLOTS = 0 is a legal
> implementation of FEAT_PMUv3p4.
>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c | 11 +----------
> > arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> > 2 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c
> > index e1860acae641..bafd5a258927 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/pmu-emul.c
> > @@ -864,16 +864,7 @@ static u64 compute_pmceid0(struct arm_pmu *pmu)
> >
> > static u64 compute_pmceid1(struct arm_pmu *pmu)
> > {
> > - u64 val = __compute_pmceid(pmu, 1);
> > -
> > - /*
> > - * Don't advertise STALL_SLOT*, as PMMIR_EL0 is handled
> > - * as RAZ
> > - */
> > - val &= ~(BIT_ULL(ARMV8_PMUV3_PERFCTR_STALL_SLOT - 32) |
> > - BIT_ULL(ARMV8_PMUV3_PERFCTR_STALL_SLOT_FRONTEND - 32) |
> > - BIT_ULL(ARMV8_PMUV3_PERFCTR_STALL_SLOT_BACKEND - 32));
> > - return val;
> > + return __compute_pmceid(pmu, 1);
> > }
>
> Make the change to PMCEID1 in a separate patch from PMMIR_EL1.
>
> > +/*
> > + * Expose only PMMIR_EL1.SLOTS to the guest, which is consumed by perf in its
> > + * topdown default metric group. Other PMMIR_EL1 fields remain RAZ. Future
> > + * patches can extend the exposed mask incrementally as KVM gains support for
> > + * those features.
> > + */
> > +static bool access_pmmir(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct sys_reg_params *p,
> > + const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
> > +{
> > + struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu = vcpu->kvm->arch.arm_pmu;
> > +
> > + if (p->is_write)
> > + return write_to_read_only(vcpu, p, r);
> > +
> > + if (check_pmu_access_disabled(vcpu, 0))
> > + return false;
Also, we don't need this check. PMMIR_EL1 is UNDEF at EL0 so we should
never take a trap from userspace. Same goes for access_pminten() which
is where this probably came from.
> > + p->regval = cpu_pmu->reg_pmmir & ARMV8_PMU_SLOTS;
> > + return true;
> > +}
> > +
>
> We can't change the value of PMMIR_EL1 unconditionally since older KVM
> treated this register as RAZ/WI. This also mixes poorly with the default
> PMU garbage that we have since as the value of the register can change
> based on where KVM_ARM_VCPU_INIT gets called...
>
> Considering everything, I'd like to see this wired up where:
>
> - PMMIR_EL1.SLOTS takes the value of the underlying hardware PMU only
> if the VMM explicitly selects a particular PMU implementation
>
> - KVM allows userspace to set PMMIR_EL1.SLOTS=0 for backwards
> compatibility
>
> Thanks,
> Oliver
>
Thanks,
Oliver
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] KVM: arm64: Expose PMMIR_EL1.SLOTS to guests
2026-06-01 19:39 [PATCH] KVM: arm64: Expose PMMIR_EL1.SLOTS to guests Congkai Tan
2026-06-01 20:06 ` Oliver Upton
@ 2026-06-02 4:14 ` kernel test robot
1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2026-06-02 4:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Congkai Tan, kvmarm, linux-arm-kernel
Cc: oe-kbuild-all, Congkai Tan, Marc Zyngier, Oliver Upton,
Joey Gouly, Suzuki K Poulose, Zenghui Yu, Catalin Marinas,
Will Deacon, Mark Rutland, Haris Okanovic, Geoff Blake,
linux-kernel
Hi Congkai,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on 1702da76e017ae0fbe1a92b07bc332972c293e89]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Congkai-Tan/KVM-arm64-Expose-PMMIR_EL1-SLOTS-to-guests/20260602-034527
base: 1702da76e017ae0fbe1a92b07bc332972c293e89
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260601193954.2103455-1-congkai%40amazon.com
patch subject: [PATCH] KVM: arm64: Expose PMMIR_EL1.SLOTS to guests
config: arm64-randconfig-r123-20260602 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260602/202606021209.2lvgE216-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 11.5.0
sparse: v0.6.5-rc1
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260602/202606021209.2lvgE216-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202606021209.2lvgE216-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c: In function 'access_pmmir':
>> arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c:1391:28: error: invalid use of undefined type 'struct arm_pmu'
1391 | p->regval = cpu_pmu->reg_pmmir & ARMV8_PMU_SLOTS;
| ^~
vim +1391 arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c
1373
1374 /*
1375 * Expose only PMMIR_EL1.SLOTS to the guest, which is consumed by perf in its
1376 * topdown default metric group. Other PMMIR_EL1 fields remain RAZ. Future
1377 * patches can extend the exposed mask incrementally as KVM gains support for
1378 * those features.
1379 */
1380 static bool access_pmmir(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct sys_reg_params *p,
1381 const struct sys_reg_desc *r)
1382 {
1383 struct arm_pmu *cpu_pmu = vcpu->kvm->arch.arm_pmu;
1384
1385 if (p->is_write)
1386 return write_to_read_only(vcpu, p, r);
1387
1388 if (check_pmu_access_disabled(vcpu, 0))
1389 return false;
1390
> 1391 p->regval = cpu_pmu->reg_pmmir & ARMV8_PMU_SLOTS;
1392 return true;
1393 }
1394
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2026-06-02 4:15 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2026-06-01 19:39 [PATCH] KVM: arm64: Expose PMMIR_EL1.SLOTS to guests Congkai Tan
2026-06-01 20:06 ` Oliver Upton
2026-06-01 20:13 ` Oliver Upton
2026-06-02 4:14 ` kernel test robot
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox