From: Geraldo Nascimento <geraldogabriel@gmail.com>
To: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>, Dragan Simic <dsimic@manjaro.org>
Cc: linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org,
"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kwilczynski@kernel.org>,
"Manivannan Sadhasivam" <mani@kernel.org>,
"Rob Herring" <robh@kernel.org>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 3/3] PCI: rockchip: drive at 2.5 GT/s, error other speeds
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2026 16:30:38 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ajBS3tGp0wqLyVq7@geday> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4ac5cd7d2271df375ed6307f5c394247721395d9.1781207474.git.geraldogabriel@gmail.com>
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 11, 2026 at 05:04:22PM -0300, Geraldo Nascimento wrote:
> Configure the core to be driven at 2.5 GT/s Link Speed and ignore
> any other speed with a warning. Also drop the 5.0 GT/s Link Speed
> defines from Rockchip PCIe header.
>
> The reason is that Shawn Lin from Rockchip has reiterated that there
> may be danger of "catastrophic failure" in using their PCIe with
> 5.0 GT/s speeds.
>
> While Rockchip has done so informally without issuing a proper errata,
> and the particulars are thus unknown, this may cause data loss or
> worse.
>
> This change is corroborated by RK3399 official datasheet [1], which
> states maximum link speed for this platform is 2.5 GT/s.
>
> [1] https://opensource.rock-chips.com/images/d/d7/Rockchip_RK3399_Datasheet_V2.1-20200323.pdf
>
> Fixes: 956cd99b35a8 ("PCI: rockchip: Separate common code from RC driver")
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/ffd05070-9879-4468-94e3-b88968b4c21b@rock-chips.com/
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Reported-by: Dragan Simic <dsimic@manjaro.org>
> Reported-by: Shawn Lin <shawn.lin@rock-chips.com>
> Signed-off-by: Geraldo Nascimento <geraldogabriel@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.c | 16 +++++++++-------
> drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.h | 3 ---
> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.c
> index 0f88da3788054..5a2876d7c8547 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-rockchip.c
> @@ -66,8 +66,10 @@ int rockchip_pcie_parse_dt(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
> }
>
> rockchip->link_gen = of_pci_get_max_link_speed(node);
> - if (rockchip->link_gen < 0 || rockchip->link_gen > 2)
> - rockchip->link_gen = 2;
> + if (rockchip->link_gen < 0 || rockchip->link_gen >= 2) {
> + rockchip->link_gen = 1;
> + dev_warn(dev, "invalid max-link-speed, limited to 2.5 GT/s\n");
> + }
>
> for (i = 0; i < ROCKCHIP_NUM_PM_RSTS; i++)
> rockchip->pm_rsts[i].id = rockchip_pci_pm_rsts[i];
> @@ -147,12 +149,12 @@ int rockchip_pcie_init_port(struct rockchip_pcie *rockchip)
> goto err_exit_phy;
> }
>
> + /* 5.0 GT/s may cause catastrophic failure for this core */
> if (rockchip->link_gen == 2)
> - rockchip_pcie_write(rockchip, PCIE_CLIENT_GEN_SEL_2,
Sashiko caught unreachable dead code rightfully here. It looks like I
had got it right in v4 and then the fix regressed.
Will address this for v7 after I get more comments.
Thanks,
Geraldo Nascimento
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-15 19:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-11 20:02 [PATCH v6 0/3] PCI: rockchip: 5.0 GT/s speed discouraged by Rockchip Geraldo Nascimento
2026-06-11 20:03 ` [PATCH v6 1/3] PCI: rockchip-ep: do not attempt 5.0 GT/s retraining Geraldo Nascimento
2026-06-11 20:03 ` [PATCH v6 2/3] PCI: rockchip-host: " Geraldo Nascimento
2026-06-11 20:04 ` [PATCH v6 3/3] PCI: rockchip: drive at 2.5 GT/s, error other speeds Geraldo Nascimento
2026-06-15 19:30 ` Geraldo Nascimento [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ajBS3tGp0wqLyVq7@geday \
--to=geraldogabriel@gmail.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=dsimic@manjaro.org \
--cc=kwilczynski@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=mani@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=shawn.lin@rock-chips.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox